Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors associated with responses to sexual harassment and satisfaction with outcome

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined contextual and behavioral factors and types of responses to sexual harassment in relation to harassed employees' satisfaction with the outcome of sexual harassment situations. Subjects were 105 male and female faculty and staff members (89.5% Caucasian; 5.7% multiethnic/multicultural; 4.8% unspecified) employed by a midwestern university who reported experiencing unwanted sexual attention on the job. Results undicated that employees responded more strongly to unwanted sexual behavior if they perceived it as sexual harassment and if they perceived their work climate as encouraging the problem. Harassed employees' gender, power, and perceptions of the work climate were all associated with their satisfaction with the situation outcome. Although making a formal or informal complaint was not associated with greater satisfaction, talking to the harasser without using aggressive communication strategies increased the likelihood of a satisfactory outcome for the employee. Talking to family or friends, a response used by women more often than men, was associated with dissatisfaction. Suggestions for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alperstein, L. P. (1986). Men. In H. L. Gochros, J. S. Gochros, & J. Fisher, (Eds.), Helping the sexually oppressed. Englewod Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., Klem, L., Davidson, T. N., O'Malley, P. M., & Rodgers, W. L. (1981). A guide for selecting statistical techniques for analyzing social science data (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balswick, J. (1988). The inexpressive male. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, S. G. (1991). Communication strategies for managing sexual harassment in organizations: Understanding message options and their effects. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, S. G., & Burleson, B. R. (1989). Multiple effects of messages with multiple goals: Some perceived outcomes of responses to sexual harassment. Human Communication Research, 16, 184–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Butterfield, M. (1986). Recognizing and communicating in harassment-prone organizational climates. Women's Studies in Communication, 9(2), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Butterfield, M. (1991, February). Information seeking, sexual harassment, and notification in organizations. Unpublished manuscript, West Virginia University, Department of Communication Studies, Morgantown, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, M., Dillard, J. P., & Doran, N. E. (1983). Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Human Communication Research, 10, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clair, R. P., McGoun, M. J., & Spirek, M. M. (1993). Sexual harassment responses of working women: An assessment of current communication oriented typologies and perceived effectiveness of the response. In G. Kreps (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Communication implications. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crull, P. (1982). Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 539–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziech, B. W., & Weiner, L. (1990). The lecherous professor: Sexual harassment on campus (2nd ed.). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fain, T. C., & Anderton, D. L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles, 17, 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faley, L. (1978). Sexual shakedown: The sexual harassment of women on the job. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. an analysis of ritual elements is social interaction. In E. Goffman, (Ed.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E. (1989). Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority, and gender in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 789–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, A. (1987). Scope and nature of sexual harassment in nursing. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s. Sex Roles, 26, 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Sociology and Social Research, 74(1), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1986). Women's responses to sexual harassment: An analysis of sociocultural, organizational, and personal resource models. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 812–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. a. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. G. (1983). Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, H. (1985). Women in a man's world: Sexual harassment. Human Relations, 38, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, M. R., & Pfeiffer, A. L. (1986). Sexual spillover in the workplace: Testing the appropriateness of male-female interaction. Women's Studies in Communication, 9, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirokawa, R. Y., Kodama, R. A., & Harper, N. L. (1990). Impact of managerial power on persuasive strategy selection by female and male managers. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, I. W., & Gutek, B. A. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1991, February). The effects of gender on the target, severity of harassment, target's responses, and gender of the rater on perception of and response to sexual harassment. Presented at the meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konsky, C., Kang, J., & Woods, A. M. (1992, November). Communication strategies in instances of work place sexual harassment. Presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Lafontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986. The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles, 15, 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, P. H., & Stewart, L. P. (1984). The extent and effects of the sexual harassment of working women. Sociological Focus, 17, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women. A case of sex discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maypole, D. E. (1986). Sexual harassment of social workers at work: Injustice within? Social Work, 31, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. C., Berchtold, I. M., Oestreich, J. L., & Collins, F. J. (1981). Sexual harassment. New York: Petrocelli Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1983). SPSSX introductory statistics guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychology Bulletin, 105, 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. S., & Jones, T. S. (1985). Sex differences, communication consistency, and judgments of sexual harassment in a performance appraisal interview. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. T. (1984). Analysis of nominal data (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1991). Gender dilemmas in sexual harassment policies and procedures. American Psychologist, 46, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., Dyer, C. E., & D'Ann, C. (1988). Campus harassment: Sexual harassment policies and procedures at institutions of higher learning. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 13, 792–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research. Method and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, D. (1989). The influence of gender on same-sex-friendships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, C. J. (1987). Sexual terrorism: The social control of women. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M., & Bybee, D. I. (1987). Female students and sexual harassment: What factors predict reporting behavior? Journal of NAWDAC, 50, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E. (1986). Organizational costs of sexual harassment. Journal of Employment Counseling, 23, 112–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1986). A framework for the study of sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1988). Psychological and demographic correlates of perception of sexual harassment. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 112, 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomann, D. A., Strickland, D. E., & Gibbons, J. L. (1989). An organizational development approach to preventing sexual harassment: Developing shared commitment through awareness training. CUPA Journal, 40, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, F. J. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. B., & Cyr, R. R. (1992). Escalating commitment to a relationship: The sexual harassment trap. Sex Roles, 27, 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA

    Shereen G. Bingham & Lisa L. Scherer

Authors
  1. Shereen G. Bingham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa L. Scherer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was primarily funded by the Center for Public Affairs Research at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. The authors gratefully acknowledge the research assistance of Jami Winters, Gena Ritter, Sarah Holmes, Kim Gangwish, and Mary Lou Costanzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bingham, S.G., Scherer, L.L. Factors associated with responses to sexual harassment and satisfaction with outcome. Sex Roles 29, 239–269 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289938

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289938

Keywords

Search

Navigation