Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-related sexual attitudes: Some crosscultural similarities and differences

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that males differentiate love and sex more strongly than females, and that the magnitude of this gender difference is augmented in homosexuals and diminished in married heterosexuals. American and Swedish subjects sorted statements describing behaviors of love, sex, and services into two piles on the basis of perceived similarity. The results of all three studies were consistent with the predictions. In addition, the findings suggest that Americans differentiate love and sex more strongly than Swedes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, I. S. Motives, intention, science and sex. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980, 3, 182–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. Sociobiology — Standing on one leg. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980, 3, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G. Cross-cultural similarity and difference in interpersonal behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G. Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 1971, 71, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., Triandis, H. C., & Katz, E. W. Crosscultural invariance in the differentiation and organization of family roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 316–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladue, B. A., Green, R., & Hellman, R. E. Neuroendocrine response to estrogen and sexual orientation. Science, 1984, 225, 1496–1499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailman, J. P. Fitness, function, fidelity, fornication and feminine philandering. The Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 1980, 3, 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E. What do women and men want from love and sex? In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. Genes, mind and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and descent of man 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foa, U.G., Anderson, B., Converse, J. et al. Gender-related sexual attitudes: Some crosscultural similarities and differences. Sex Roles 16, 511–519 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292485

Keywords

Navigation