Abstract
Early empirical studies carried out in the U.S. of geographically distributed or ‘ecological’ delinquency rates have tended to stress the importance of environmental, attitudinal (anomic) variables and institutional factors as the principal determinants of urban delinquency. More recent research however has indicated that delinquency is highly related with socio-economic status, rather than with purely ecological factors or with ‘anomie’. In the present paper we present new evidence, based on published data, on the causal structure of delinquency in metropolitan London boroughs by means of a combined use of two well known multivariate techniques-regression analysis and factor analysis. It is found that 50% of the variance of London annual delinquency rates is explained by two indicators of socio-economic status or class used as independent regression variables. In addition, when social class is controlled for, half of the remaining variance is accounted for by indicators of urban land use and post-war population mobility. Thus 75% of the total observed delinquency variance is explained by the regression equation. Finally, the quantified indicators provide a useful typology of London boroughs which permits a characterisation of urban areas in terms of their crimogenic properties.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Ahamad B., 1967, ‘An Analysis of Crimes by the Method of Principal Components’, Applied Statist. 16, 17–35.
Albert A., 1972, Regression and the Moore-Penrose Pseudo-Inverse, Academic Press, New York.
Basilevsky, A., 1974, ‘Factor Analysis Regression’, University of Kent, Mimeographed.
Bordua D. J., 1959, ‘Juvenile Delinquency and “Anomie”: An Attempt at Replication’, Social Problems 6, 230–38.
Chilton R. J., 1964, ‘Continuity in Delinquency Area Research: A Comparison of Studies for Baltimore, Detroit, and Indianapolis’, Amer. Sociol. Rev. 29, 71–83.
Chilton R. and Dussich J. P. J., 1974, ‘Methodological Issues in Delinquency Research: Some Alternative Analyses of Geographically Distributed Data’, 53, 73–82.
Gordon R. A., 1967, ‘Issues in the Ecological Study of Delinquency’, Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32, 927–44.
Hirschi T. and Selvin H. C., 1967, Delinquency Research, Free Press, New York.
Lander, B., 1954, Towards an Understanding of Juvenile Delinquency, Columbia University Press.
Lawley D. N. and Maxwell A. E., 1971, Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, Butterworth, London.
Phillips L., Votey H. L., and Maxwell D., 1972, ‘Crime, Youth, and the Labour Market’, Jour. of Pol. Econ. 80, 491–504.
Polk K., 1967, ‘Urban Social Areas and Delinquency’, Social Problems 14, 320–25.
Voss H. I. and Petersen D. M., 1971, Ecology, Crime and Delinquency, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Walker M. A., 1967, ‘Some Critical Comments on “An Analysis of Crimes by the Method of Principal Components” by B. Ahamad’, Applied Statist. 16, 36–39.
Walker, M. A. and Bottoms, A. E., 1973, ‘Statistical Problems in Criminology’, Paper presented to the International Statistics Institute Conference, Vienna.
Wallis C. P. and Maliphant R., 1967, ‘Delinquent Areas in the County of London: Ecological Factors’, Brit. Jour. of Crimin. 7, 250–84.
Weber D. C., 1971, ‘Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process’, Jour. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 66, 285–288.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basilevsky, A. Social class and delinquency in London boroughs. Soc Indic Res 2, 287–313 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293250
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293250