Summary
Behavioral comparisons were made of two populations of the garter snake Thamnophis elegans: a typical population with semi-aquatic habits and diet (inland population), and a coastal population that has entered a terrestrial feeding niche. Laboratory-born snakes of both populations were compared for their tendency to eat fish and their aquatic foraging behavior.
A significantly higher proportion of inland snakes than coastal snakes ate the first fish offered, and during 16 weeks on a fish diet inland snakes ate live and dead fish significantly more frequently. In both populations individual differences were extreme: some snakes never refused fish, while others refused consistently to the point of starvation.
In foraging trials, inland snakes spent a significantly greater proportion of time on aquatic foraging behaviors (craning and cruising, and diving), made significantly more aerial and underwater attacks, and captured more fish than coastal snakes. Coastal snakes that engaged in aquatic foraging used the same behavioral repertoire as inland snakes. Coastal snakes that declined to perform aquatic foraging were subsequently induced to exhibit the full aquatic foraging repertoire by extreme food deprivation and a potent prey stimulus situation. Apparently, the coastal population has retained all the elements of its aquatic foraging repertoire, but its tendencies to perform them have diminished.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold SJ (1977) Polymorphism and geographic variation in the feeding behavior of the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Science 197:676–678
Arnold SJ (1978) Some effects of early experience on feeding responses in the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Anim Behav 26:455–462
Arnold SJ (1981a) The microevolution of feeding behavior. In: Kamil A, Sargent T (eds) Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological and psychological approaches. Garland, New York
Arnold SJ (1981b) Behavioral variation in natural populations. 1. Phenotypic genetic and environmental correlations between chemoreceptive responses to prey in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35:489–509
Arnold SJ (1981c) Benavioral variation in natural populations. II. The inheritance of a feeding response in crosses between geographic races of the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35:510–515
Arnold SJ, Wasserzug RJ (1978) Differential predation on metamorphic anurans by garter snakes (Thamnophis): social behavior as a possible defense. Ecology 59:1014–1022
Burghardt GM (1970) Intraspecific geographical variation in chemical food cue preferences of newborn garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis). Behaviour 36:246–257
Burghardt GM (1971) Chemical cue preferences of newborn snakes: influence of prenatal maternal experience. Science 1971:921–923
Burghardt GM, Hess EH (1968) Factors influencing the chemical release of prey attack in newborn snakes. J Comp Physiol Psychol 66:289–295
Dix MW (1968) Snake food preference: innate intraspecific geographic variation. Science 159:1478–1479
Drummond H (1979) Stimulus control of amphibious predation in the northern water snake (Nerodia s. sipedon). Z Tierpsychol 50:18–44
Drummond H (in press) Aquatic foraging in garter snakes: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Behaviour
Fich HS (1940) A biogeographical study of the ordinoides artenkreis of garter snakes (genus Thamnophis). Univ Calif Publ Zool 44:1–150
Fitch HS (1941) The feeding habits of California garter snakes. Calif Fish Game 27:1–32
Fox W (1951) Relationships among the garter snakes of the Thamnophis elegans rassenkreis. Univ Calif Publ Zool 50:485–529
Fox W (1952) Notes on the feeding habits of Pacific coast garter snakes. Herpetologica 8:4–8
Fuchs J, Burghardt GM (1971) Effects of early feeding experience on the responses of garter snakes to food chemicals. Learn Motiv 2:271–279
Gibbons JD (1976) Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Gove D, Burghardt GM (1975) Responses of ecologically dissimilar populations of the water snake Natrix s. sipedon to chemical cues from prey. J Chem Ecol 1:25–40
Gray L (1981) Genetic and experiential differences affecting foraging behavior. In: Kamil A, Sargent T (eds) Foraging behavior: ecological ethological and psychological approaches. Garland, New York
Haas A (1962) Phylogenetisch bedeutungsvolle Verhaltensänderungen bei Hummeln. Z Tierpsychol 19:356–370
Kephart DG (1982) Microgeographic variation in the diet of garter snakes. Oecologia (Berl) 52:287–291
Kephart DG, Arnold SJ (1982) Garter snake diets in a fluctuating environment: a seven year study. Ecology (in press)
Leyhausen P (1965) Über die Funktion der relativen Stimmungshierarchie. Z Tierpsychol 22:412–494
Lorenz K (1958) The evolution of behavior. Sci Am 199:67–78
Schemmel C (1967) Vergleichende Untersuchungen an den Hautsinnesorganen ober-und unterirdisch lebender Artyanax-Formen. Z Morphol Tiere 61:255–316
White M, Kolb JA (1974) A preliminary study of Thamnophis near Sagehen Creek, California. Copeia 1974:126–136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drummond, H., Burghardt, G.M. Geographic variation in the foraging behavior of the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12, 43–48 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296931
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296931