Skip to main content
Log in

Errors in particle sizing by LDA due to turbidity in the incident laser beams

  • Originals
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements have been made of the effect of flow turbidity on the visibility and pedestal amplitude of an anemometer signal when incident laser beams are interrupted by particulate flow. The purpose is to assess the likely accuracy of particle sizing and the reliability of discrimination between continuous and particulate phase velocities. Optical depths of field were varied between 2.5 × 10−2 and 14 × 10−2 mm the diameter of the interrupting particles ranged between 14 and 800 μm in six discrete ranges and the corresponding void fractions lay between 0.003% and 0.378%. The incident beam diameter was approximately 400 μm.

The measured size is subject to both systematic and random errors when inferred from measurements of pedestal amplitude: the random error increases as the ratio of the incident beam diameter to that of the particulate phase decreases. Systematic errors corresponding to a 10% underestimation of diameter occur at void fractions of 0.003%, 0.01% and 0.018% for particles below 40 μm 75 μm and 105 μm respectively over a 5 cm depth of field. The r.m.s. error is smaller than 7% for particles below 40 μm for all conditions studied but increases with increasing diameter and exceeds 10% at void fractions greater than 0.1% for particles above about 100 μm. The random error in measured diameter derived from measurements of visibility is influenced mostly by the flow turbidity over the 5 cm of the incident beams closest to the measuring volume. For interrupting particles smaller than about 100 μm the r.m.s. error is similar to that for measurements based on the pedestal amplitude.

Discrimination of the velocity signal between the particulate and dispersed phase, based on the separation of pedestal amplitudes, is likely to be unreliable if the particle diameter is comparable to the diameter of the incident beams and if the probability of two particles simultaneously present in each beam is not negligible. A method for estimating the level of turbidity at which discrimination is no longer possible is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b :

beam diameter

d :

particle diameter

D :

amplitude of high passed Doppler signal (equation 7)

D 1 :

depth of field of water tank

E :

particle extinction coefficient (= 2)

I 1,2 :

instantaneous light intensity at LDA measuring volume of each incident beam

n :

particle concentration (number per unit volume)

N :

number of particles in the incident beam

P :

maximum amplitude of pedestal component of Doppler signal

T :

Transmittance of beam {(attenuated/unattenuated) beam intensity}

V :

signal visibility (equation 8)

ε:

relative error in measured particle diameter {(truemeasured)/true)}

λ:

wavelength of laser beam (632.8 nm)

References

  • Adrian, R. J.; Orloff, K L. 1977: Laser anemometry signals: visibility characteristics and application to particle sizing. Appl. Opt. 16, 677–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachalo, W. D. 1980: A method for measuring the size and velocity of spheres by dual beam scatter interferometry. Appl. Opt. 19, 363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachalo, W. D.; Houser, M. J. 1984: Phase/Doppler spray analyzer for simultaneous measurements of drop size and velocity distributions. Opt. Eng. 23, 583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, F. 1973: Scattering phenomena and their application in optical anemometry. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 24, 619–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, F.; Melling, A.; Whitelaw, J. H. 1981: Principles and practice of laser Doppler anemometry, 2nd Edition. London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Durst, F.; Zaré, M. 1975: Laser Doppler measurements in two phase flows. In: The accuracy of flow measurements by laser Doppler methods, pp. 403–429. Proceedings LDA Symposium, Copenhagen, Skovlunde, Denmark

  • Eckbreth, A.; Stufflebeam, J. 1985: Considerations for the application of CARS. Exp. Fluids 3,301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeth, G. M.; Shuen, J.-S.; Solomon, A. S. P.; Zhang, Q.-F. 1985: Structure of particle-laden jets: measurements and predictions. AIAA J. 23, 396–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, W. M. 1972: Measurement of particle size, number density and velocity using laser interferometer. Appl. Opt. 11, 2603–2612

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C. F. 1985: A technique to measure the size of particles in Laser-Doppler velocity applications. Second International Symposium on Laser anemometry, Miami. ASME FED, Vol. 33, pp. 119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C. F.; Espinosa, V. E. 1984: Spray characterisation with a non intrusive technique using absolute scattered light. Opt. Eng. 23, 604–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, J. R. 1966: The optical measurement of aerosols. In: Davies, C. N. (ed.): Aerosol Science, pp. 287–357. London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holve, D.; Self, S. 1979: An optical particle sizing counter for in situ measurements — parts I and II. J. Appl. Opt. 18, 1632–1652

    Google Scholar 

  • Holve, D.; Self, S. 1980: Optical measurements of mean particle size in coal-fired MHD flows. Combust. Flame 37, 211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Holve, D.; Annen, K. D. 1984: Optical particle counting, sizing and velocimetry using intensity deconvolution. Opt. Eng. 23, 591–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Y.; Lockwood, F. C. 1981: Velocity measurements in a particle laden turbulent free jet. Combust. Flame 40, 333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Modarress, D.; Tan, H. 1983: LDA signal discrimination in two-phase flows. Exp. Fluids 1, 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, C. K.; Drain, L. E. 1982: Mie calculations of the scattered light from a spherical particle traversing a fringe pattern produced by two intersecting laser beams. J. Phys. D 15, 375–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffman, M.; Buchhave, P.; Tanger, H. 1984: Simultaneous measurement of size, concentration and velocity of spherical particles by a laser Doppler method. 2nd Intl. Symposium on Applications of Laser Anemometry to Fluid Mechanics, Paper 8.1. Lisbon

  • Yeoman, M. L.; Azzopardi, B. J.; White, H. J.; Bates, C. J.; Roberts, P. J. 1982: Optical development and application of a two colour LDA system for the simultaneous measurement of particle size and particle velocity. In: Engineering Applications of Laser Velocimetry, pp. 127–135. Winter Annual Meeting, ASME, Phoenix, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, M. L.; Hemsley, D. J.; Hadded, O.; Bates, C. J. 1985: A single particle optical counting instrument for on-line simultaneous measurement of drop size, velocity and concentration in sprays and spray systems. Paper VC/1, 3rd International Conference on Liquid Atomisation and Spray Systems, The Institute of Energy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, A. J.; Ereaut, P. R.; Ungut, A. 1983: Droplet sizes and velocities in vaporizing sprays. Combust. Flame 54, 15–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kliafas, Y., Taylor, A.M.K.P. & Whitelaw, J.H. Errors in particle sizing by LDA due to turbidity in the incident laser beams. Experiments in Fluids 5, 159–176 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298456

Keywords

Navigation