Skip to main content
Log in

Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dominant/nondominant differences in bone mineral density (BMD) have been observed in the upper extremities. However for the proximal femur, the distinction between dominant and nondominant hips is not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate left/right variations in femoral BMD and hip axis length (HAL) in both single beam and fan beam dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. A total of 36 women aged 41–76 years (average age 60±10 years) received single beam and fan beam DXA scans of both proximal femora with a Hologic QDR-2000 scanner. Femoral BMD and hip axis length were determined for each scan. Left/right and single beam/fan beam correlations were determined and differences were evaluated using a two-way analysis of variance. Femoral BMD at corresponding measurement regions in opposing femora were highly correlated (r=0.81–0.96). No significant left/right differences were detected. At the femoral neck, the mean BMD difference (± standard deviation) was 1.5%±4.7% in a single beam mode and-0.6%±6.3% in fan beam mode. Though mean values of femoral BMD were equivalent, the observed individual left/right differences were occasionally large (as high as 26% in the femoral neck). The hip axis length of the left and right hips were highly correlated and statistically equivalent. However, hip axis length using fan beam was significantly larger (7.5%) than the single beam measurement with a larger observed variation. We conclude that measurement of a single proximal femur will usually be sufficient for clinical evaluation of BMD and/or hip axis length. However, bilateral BMD measurements are indicated in subjects where unilateral degeneration or disease are suspected. If possible, hip axis length should be measured in single beam mode to avoid magnification errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lessig HJ, Meltzer MS, Siegel JA (1988) The symmetry of the hip bone mineral density: a dual photon absorptiometry approach. Radiology 167:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balserio J, Fahey FH, Ziessman HA, Le TV (1987) Comparison of BMD in both hips. Clin Nucl Med 12(10):811–812

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall ML, Heavens J, Ell PJ (1991) Variation between femurs measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Eur J Nucl Med 18:38–40

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lilley J, Walters BG, Health DA, Drolc Z (1992) Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 2:274–278

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8(10):1211–1217

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glüer CC, Cummings SR, Pressman A, Li J, Glüer K, Faulkner KG, Grampp S, Genant HK (1994) Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 9(5):671–677

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 9(7):1065–1070

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Estilo M, Genant HK (1993) Crosscalibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000. Calcif Tissue Int 52:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  9. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1993) Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8(10):1227–1233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Ribot C (1993) Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? Calcif Tissue Int 52:344–347

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lai K, Rencken M, Drinkwater BL, Chesnut CH (1993) Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision. Calcif Tissue Int 53:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for the prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faulkner, K.G., Genant, H.K. & McClung, M. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56, 26–31 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298740

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298740

Key words

Navigation