Summary
The meadow pipit Anthus pratensis is one of the most frequent hosts in Europe parasitized by the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. The cuckoo normally removes one or more of the host eggs and replaces them with one of its own. The aim of the present study, which was conducted in an upland area of Central Norway, was to test the following question: assuming the cuckoo has laid a mimetic egg (which is slightly larger than and slightly different in color from that of a meadow pipit egg), under what circumstances are the parent meadow pipits able to detect such parasitism? The reaction of the meadow pipits to artificial parasitism was tested. Plastic model cuckoo eggs were used that bore a striking resemblance to real cuckoo eggs found in other meadow pipit nests in the same area. In addition, in some experiments a stuffed cuckoo dummy was used. The meadow pipits tolerated the experimental procedures and remained in their nests when given an artificial cuckoo egg, with or without removal of one of the host's eggs. However, when a host egg was removed and replaced with an artificial cuckoo egg, and at the same time a stuffed cuckoo dummy was presente, 50% of the birds deserted their nests. The difference between this result and the results of the other experiments was statistically significant. When only the stuffed cuckoo was presented, without any egg manipulations, the meadow pipits reacted in the same way as in the egg experiments. We conclude that the meadow pipit is capable of detecting whether or not its nest has been parasitized, provided it has observed the cuckoo near the nest site. Furthermore, because of the results of our experiments, we reject the hypothesis that the cuckoo has evolved egg removal behavior in order to prevent the host from assessing an increase in egg numbers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali SA (1931) The origin of mimicry in cuckoo eggs. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 34:1067–1070
Baker ECS (1942) Cuckoo problems. Witherby, London
Chance E (1940) The truth about the cuckoo. Country Life, London
Clark KL, Robertson RJ (1979) Spatial and temporal multispecies nesting aggregations in birds as anti-parasite and anti-predator defenses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:359–371
Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284
Haftorn S (1971) Norges fugler. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
Hays H, LeCroy M (1971) Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the common tern. Wilson Bull 83:425–429
Lack D (1963) Cuckoo hosts in England. Bird Study 10:185–203
Lack D (1968) Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London
Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1987) Cuckoo host interactions in Norwegian mountain areas. Ornis Scand 18:168–172
Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1988) Responses of fieldfares Turdus pilaris and bramblings Fringilla montifringilla to experimental parasitism by the cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Ibis 130:535–539
Molnar B (1944) The cuckoo in the Hungarian plain. Aquila (Budapest) 51:100–112
Rensch B (1924) Zur Entstehung der Mimikry der Kuckuckseier. J Ornithol 72:461–472
Robertson RJ, Norman RF (1976) Behavioral defenses to brood parasitism by potential hosts of the brown-headed cowbird. Condor 78:166–173
Rothstein SI (1975) An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor 77:250–271
Rothstein SI (1976) Experiments of defenses cedar waxwings use against cowbirds parasitism. Auk 93:675–691
Rothstein SI (1982) Success and failure in avian egg and nestling recognition with comments on the utility of optimal reasoning. Am Zool 22:547–560
Spaw CD, Rohwer S (1987) A comparative study of eggshell thickness in cowbirds and other passerines. Condor 89:307–318
Swynnerton CFM (1918) Rejection by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 1918:27–54
Wyllie I (1981) The Cuckoo. Batsford, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E. Adaptations of meadow pipits to parasitism by the common cuckoo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24, 25–30 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300114
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300114