Skip to main content
Log in

Objective and subjective determinants of prospective residential mobility

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing interest in subjective as well as objective measures of well-being raises the issue of the relative importance of these two different types of measures when they are included as independent variables in analytical or predictive models. In the research reported here, survey data are used to evaluate the relative importance of objective and subjective indicators in providing an understanding of why households desire to move. Overall, it is found that subjective indicators add considerably to the explanation of mobility inclinations over and above that contributed by objective indicators. A comparison of explanatory powers for the full sets of objective and subjective predictors within two length of residence subgroups indicates some interesting differences, however. Objective and subjective predictors are close in explanatory power for longer-term residents, while subjective measures are considerably more important for shorter-term residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Andrews, Frank M. et al.: 1973, Multiple Classification Analysis, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.: 1971, ‘Social Accounting in the 1970's’, Michigan Business Review XXIII, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. and Converse, P.: 1972, The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Greg and Newman, Sandra: (forthcoming), ‘People as Planners: The Role of Expectations in Prospective Residential Mobility’, J. Morgan (ed.), Five Thousand American Families—Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. III, Survey Research Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Foote, N. et al.: 1960, Housing Choices and Housing Constraints, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. and Rodgers, W.: 1974, ‘Toward an Understanding of Community Satisfaction’, A.Hawley and V.Rock (eds.), Urbanization — The State of Knowledge, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S.: 1974, The Residential Environment and the Desire to Move, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.: 1973, ‘Measures of the Quality of Urban Life’, Paper presented at Conference on the City in History, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Rossi, P.: 1955, Why Families Move, The Free Press, Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonquist, J. et al.: 1971, Searching for Structure, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withey, S.: (forthcoming), ‘Values and Social Change’, B. Strumpel (ed.), Subjective Elements of Well Being, OECD, Paris.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newman, S. Objective and subjective determinants of prospective residential mobility. Soc Indic Res 2, 53–63 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300470

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300470

Keywords

Navigation