Abstract
Recent interest in social indicators of change has emphasized the unidimensional monitoring of social programs. Reciprocal indicators permit the recording of two-dimensional, or contrasting, trends within a selected system thereby providing efficient evaluation of program effectiveness. A religious indicator of congregation size, illustrates the differences in these two forms of indicators. Suggestions are made regarding application of reciprocal indicators and the policy implications associated with such use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
AndersonJames G.: 1973, ‘Causal Models and Social Indicators: Toward the Development of Social Systems Models’, American Sociological Review 38, 285–301.
BauerRaymond A. (ed.): 1966, Social Indicators, MIT Press, Cambridge.
BrewerEarl D. C.: 1973, ‘Social Indicators and Religious Indicators’, Review of Religious Research 14, 77–90.
ChoateNorman L.: 1972, ‘Evaluation and Methods in Applied Research’, Review of Religious Research 13, 101–106.
FontanePatrick E.: 1974, ‘Viability of Congregation as a Religious Indicator’, Social Indicators Research 1, 243–255.
FontanePatrick E.: 1972, ‘The Church Worker in the Neighborhood Congregation’, Review of Religious Research 13, 140–141 (Winter).
FoxDavid: 1967, Expansion of the More Effective Schools Program, Center for Urban Education, New York.
Hansen, Morris R. and Bryant, Edward C.: 1972, ‘National Assessment Design Implications’, unpublished paper, presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meetings.
Mushkin, Selma J.: 1973, National Assessment and Social Indicators, United States Government, Department of Health, Education and Welfare; (OE)-73-11111.
United States Government Printing Office: 1974, Reading: Summary Data, National Assessment of Educational Progress, 02-R-00; S/N 1780-01325; Washington, D.C.; July.
Wilson, Robert L.: 1972, ‘Indicators of Religious Institutions’, Unpublished paper, United Methodist Task Force on Religious Indicators.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Revision of a paper presented to the Annual Meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society, April 5–7, 1974; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I wish to thank Richard G. Sipes for his criticisms and helpful comments on parts of this manuscript and for his encouragement toward publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fontane, P.E. Improving program evaluation with reciprocal indicators. Soc Indic Res 2, 211–221 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300536
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300536