Skip to main content
Log in

Sex of leader, leader behavior, and subordinate satisfaction

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2×2×2 factorial design was employed to examine the influence of instructed leadership style, sex of leader, and sex of followers on leader behavior, subordinate satisfaction, and productivity in a simple task. In general, male and female leaders were equally able and equally willing to display autocratic and democratic leadership styles if so instructed. Similarly, leader sex did not have a significant influence on subordinate satisfaction or productivity either by itself or in interaction with leadership style or follower sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartol, K. The effect of male vs. female leaders. Journal of Business Research, 1975, 3, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K., & Butterfield, D. Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 446–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., Krusall, J., & Alexander, R. H. Male manager's attitude toward working women. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971, 15, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belasco, J. A., Hampton, D. R., & Price, K. F. Management today. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, J. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 50–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. M. Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 595–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, E. A., Paul, R. J., & Olins, R. A. Perceived importance of selected variables used to evaluate male and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 1973, 26, 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. Comparison of male and female leadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 645–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M. Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 1976, 39, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. Sex differences in supervision. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, 1974.

  • Helmrich, D. Male and female presidents: Some implications of leadership style. Human Resource Management, 1974, 13, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobart, C., & Haines, K. Sex role stereotyping among future managers. In J. Jewell (Ed.), Women and management. Atlanta: Georgia State University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M., & Effertz, J. Sex roles and leadership perceptions of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M., & Hall, K. Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malabre, A. Women at work. Wall Street Journal, August 28, 1978, p. 1.

  • Massengill, D., & DiMarco, N. Relationship between stereotypes of managers, men and women. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R. N., & Vickars, W. M. Sex stereotypes: An artifact in leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 1976, 19, 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. H., Terborg, J. R., & Traynor, J. Women as Managers Scale: A measure of attitudes toward women in managerial positions. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974 (Ms. No. 585).

  • Petty, M. M., & Lee, G. K. Moderating effects of sex of supervisor and subordinate on relationship between supervisor behavior and subordinate satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 624–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M. M., & Miles, R. H. Leader sex-role stereotyping in a female dominated work culture. Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, M. M., Odewahn, C. A., Bruning, N. S., & Thomason, T. L. An examination of the moderating effects of supervisor sex and subordinate sex upon the relationship between supervisory behavior and subordinate outcomes in mental health organizations. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 1977, 408–412.

  • Schein, V. E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S., Kipnis, D., & Wilkinson, I. Power tactics used within organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, in press.

  • Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayarant, J. E. The queen bee syndrome. In C. Tavris (Ed.), The female experience. Del Mar, Calif.: C.R.M. Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R. Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R., Peters, L. H., Ilgen, D. R., & Smith, F. Organizational and personal correlates of attitudes toward women in management. Academy of Management Journal, 1977, 20, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stitt, C., Schmidt, S., Price, K. et al. Sex of leader, leader behavior, and subordinate satisfaction. Sex Roles 9, 31–42 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303107

Keywords

Navigation