Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twelve patients were studied for a median of 18 hours (range 8.5–21.5 hr) by continuous, ambulatory, simultaneous pouch and anal manometry 10–85 months after restorative proctocolectomy. Two main patterns of motility were observed: (1) Large isolated contractions up to 68 cm H2O in amplitude and up to 67 seconds in duration were present in ten patients. These were often associated with the urge to defaecate and were more frequent before defaecation than after but did not appear to be associated with expulsion of faeces from the pouch. In two patients atypical large isolated contractions up to 378 cm H2O in amplitude were observed. (2) Rhythmic contractions at a frequency of 7–11 per minute and amplitude of 24–330 cm H2O, occurred for a duration of 18 seconds to 18 minutes in six patients. In the other six patients this motility pattern was not seen. Of the 12 patients nine were considered to have good function (five or less bowel actions per 24 hours) and three poor function (ten or more bowel actions per 24 hours). Rhythmic activity was the predominant motility pattern in all three with poor function whereas large isolated contractions predominated in those with good function, although there was considerable overlap in the types of motility observed between patients with good and poor function. Mean pouch pressure tended to be higher in patients with poor function than in those with good function both throughout the entire recording and during sleep. In a number of patients simultaneous anal recordings revealed the presence of slow waves and falls in pressure, some of which were associated with a simultaneous rise in pouch pressure.

Résumé

Douze patients ayant subi une proctocolectomie avec confection d'un réservoir et d'une anastomose iléoanale ont été étudiés. 10–85 mois après l'intervention ils ont subi simultanément, ambulatoirement, et de manière continue durant 18 heures en moyenne (8.5–21,5 heures) une manométrie de la poche et du canal anal. Deux types principaux d'activité motrice ont été observés: (1) des contractions larges et isolées mesurant jusqu'à 68 cm d'H2O d'amplitude et durant jusqu'à 67 secondes étaient présentes chez 10 patients. Ces contractions étaient fréquemment associées avec des défécations impérieuses et étaient plus fréquentes avant qu'après défécation mais ne semblaient pas s'associer à l'expulsion du contenu fécal de la poche. Chez 2 patients, on a observé de larges contractions isolées atypiques mesurant jusqu'à 373 cm H2O d'amplitude. (2) Des contractions rythmiques d'une fréquence de 7–11/minute, d'une amplitude de 24–330 cm H2O et d'une durée de 18 secondes à 18 minutes ont été observés chez 6 patients. Ce type de contraction n'a pas été noté chez les 6 autres patients. Neuf des 12 patients ont été jugés comme ayant une bonne fonction (5 ou moins de 5 exonérations par 24 heures) et 3 comme ayant un résultat médiocre (10 et plus exonérations par 24 heures). Des contractions rythmiques constituent le mode prédominant d'activité motrice chez les 3 patients dont le résultat fonctionnel est médiocre alors que le larges contractions isolées prédominent chez les patients dont le résultat fonctionnel est bon, bien que les 2 types d'activité se chevauchent considérablement entre les 2 groupes de patients avec bon ou médiocre résultat fonctionnel. La pression moyenne est plus élevée durant tout l'enregistrement et durant le sommeil chez les patients dont le résultat fonctionnel est mauvais que chez ceux dont le résultat fonctionnel est bon. Chez un petit nombre de patients, l'enregistrement simultané des pressions du canal anal met en évidence des ondes lentes et des chutes de la pression survenant chez quelques uns simultanément à des hausses de la pression dans la poche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor BM, Cranley B, Kelly KA, Philipps SF, Beart RW, Dozois RR (1983) A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileo-anal anastomoses. Ann Surg 198:462–468

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rabau MY, Percy JP, Parks AG (1982) Ileal pelvic reservoir: a correlation between motor pattern and clinical behaviour. Br J Surg 69:391–395

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akwari OE, Kelly KA, Phillips SF (1980) Myoelectrical and motor patterns of continent pouch and conventional ileostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 150:363–371

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gadacz TR, Kelly KA, Phillips SF (1987) The continent ileal pouch: absorptive and motor features. Gastroenterology 72:1287–1291

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harms BA, Pahl AC, Starling JR (1990) Comparison of clinical and compliance characteristics between S and W ileal reservoirs. Am J Surg 159:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stryker SJ, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW (1986) Anal and neo-rectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 203:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller R, Orrom WJ, Duthie G, Bartolo DCC, Mortensen NJMcC (1990) Ambulatory anorectal physiology in patients following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: comparison with normal controls. Br J Surg 77:895–897

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quigley EMM, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Weinbeck B, Tucker RL, Haddad A (1984) Motility of the terminal ileum and ileocaecal sphincter in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 87:857–866

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stryker SJ, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Kelly KA, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr (1985) Motility of the small intestine after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 201:351–356

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chaussade S, Merite F, Hautefeuille M, Valleur P, Hautefeuille P, Couturier D (1989) Motility of the jejunum after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anastomosis. Gut 30:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levitt MD, Kamm MA, Groom J, Hawley PR, Nicholls RJ (1992) Ileoanal pouch compliance and motor function. Br J Surg 79:126–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Groom JS, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1992) Small bowel motility — a determinant of functional outcome in patients with an ileoanal reservoir. Gut 33 [Suppl]:S29

  13. Levitt MD, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1991) Pouch dynamics —a simple test of ileo-anal pouch evacuation. Int J Colorect Dis 6:158–160

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrera A, Pemberton JH, Hanson RB (1992) Preservation or continence after ileoanal anastomosis by the coordination of ileal pouch and anal canal motor activity. Am J Surg 163:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  15. O'Connell PR, Stryker SJ, Metcalf AM, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA (1988) Anal canal pressure and motility after ileo-anal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pescatori M, Parks AG (1984) The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158:517–521

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaussade S, Verduron A, Hautefeuille M, Risleight G, Guerre J, Couturier D, Valleur P, Hautefeuille P (1989) Proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis without conservation of a rectal muscular cuff. Br J Surg 76:273–275

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oresland T, Fasth S, Akervall S, Nordgren S, Hulten L (1990) Manovolumetric and sensory characteristics of the ileoanal J pouch compared with healthy rectum. Br J Surg 77:803–806

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar D, Waldron D, Nicholls RJ, Williams NS (1989) Ileal pouch motor activity and its relationship to pouch function. Tripartite Meeting, Birmingham, UK, 189 (Abstract WAM16).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levitt, M.D., Kamm, M.A., van der Sijp, J.R.M. et al. Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs. Int J Colorect Dis 9, 40–44 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304299

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304299

Keywords

Navigation