Summary
Among mathematical models of visual confusion of letters and similar material, those that posit a feature detection process have been especially popular. The present study provides direct tests of several of the central assumptions of such models with feature-stimuli composed of the blank, one of two straight line features, or both line features positioned at a right angle. In one condition, the two features were connected when they appeared together, whereas in the other condition they were separated by a gap. A model which makes the strong assumptions that the features are sampled (‘detected’) independently and then reported in a direct, unbiased fashion, performed acceptably in both conditions. Feature dependency models and those positing a biased decision process were ruled out on the basis of poor fits or lack of parsimony. The perceptibility (d′) of a specific feature depended on the stimulus that contained it in the Gap condition but not in the Connected condition. The relative perceptibility of the horizontal vs in the vertical features was also different in the Gap vs Connected conditions. The results were compared with other recent studies, including ones in which sampling independence was falsified, apparently because of greater stimulus complexity, and employing a stimulus set that did not contain all possible combinations of features.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chandler JP (1965) Subroutine STEPIT: An algorithm that finds the values of the parameters which minimize a given continuous function. Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Garner WR (1978) Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and Categorization. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Geyer LH, DeWald CG (1973) Feature lists and confusion matrices. Percept Psychophys 14:471–482
Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York, NY
Hartline HK (1940) The receptive fields of optic nerve fibers. Am J Physiol 130:235–237
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160:106–154
Hubert LA (1972) A statistical method for investigating the perceptual confusions among geometric configurations. J Math Psychol 9:389–403
Lappin JS (1978) The relativity of choice behavior and the effect of prior knowledge on the speed and accuracy of recognition. In: Castellan NJ, Jr, Restle F (eds) Cognitive Theory, vol 3. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
Lettvin JW, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1959) What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc IRE 47:1940–1951
Luce RD (1963) Detection and recognition. In: Luce RD, Bush RB, Galanter E (eds) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol I. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
Massaro DW, Schmuller J (1975) Visual features, preperceptual storage, and processing time in reading. In: Understanding Language. Academic Press, New York, NY
Oden GC (1979) A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:336–352
Reed SK (1973) Psychological Processes in Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, New York, NY
Rumelhart DE (1971) A multicomponent theory of confusions among briefly exposed alphabetic characters. Center for Human Information Processing Report No 22. University of California, San Diego, CA
Schulze HH, Baurichter W, Gerling W, Grobe R (1977) Independent feature processing in the visual system: The effects of symmetry and distance of components. Psychol Res 39 (3):249–259
Townsend JT (1971a) Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Percept Psychophys 9:40–50
Townsend JT (1971b) Alphabetic confusion: A test of models for individuals. Percept Psychophys 9:449–454
Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1976) Testing contemporary models of letter recognition. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL
Townsend JT, Hu GG (1980) Testing the independence of visual feature perception. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Mathematical Psychology Meetings, Madison, WI
Townsend JT, Hu GG, Ashby FG (1980) A test of visual feature sampling independence with orthogonal straight lines. Bull Psychonom Soc 15 (3):163–166
Wandmacher J (1976) Multicomponent theory of perception: Feature extraction and response decision in visual identification. Psycholog Res 39:17–37
Wandmacher J, Kammerer EM, Glowalla U (1980) Context dependence in visual feature processing. Psychol Res 40:335–351
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank J.T. Berning for help in conducting the experiments. The first and second authors were supported by NSF Grant #BNS 76-84053 and the third author by Purdue Research Foundation Grant #XR 0104 during the early portions of this research. The latter portions were aided by National Science Foundation Grant #BNS 79-20298 to the first author. The third author is now at Human Performance Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210. Send for reprints to Dr. James T. Townsend, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Townsend, J.T., Hu, G.G. & Ashby, F.G. Perceptual sampling of orthogonal straight line features. Psychol. Res 43, 259–275 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308451
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308451