Skip to main content
Log in

Addressing issues in letter recognition

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present research strategy utilizes factorial designs, functional measurement, testing of mathematical models and strong inference in the study of letter perception. To test the viability of this framework, subjects judged a number of ambiguous letters, varying between Q and G, in both a rating and discrete choice task. The letters were created by varying features of openness in the oval and the obliqueness of the straight line. Experimental and theoretical tests on the results indicate that multiple sources of featural information simultaneously contribute to the perception of letters. The features provide continuous rather than discrete information to an integration process and the evaluation of the information provided by one feature is independent of the nature of the other features. The integration process results in the least ambiguous letter feature contributing the most to the perceptual judgment. A fuzzy logical model developed in other domains, such as speech perception, provides a good description of exactly these phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N.H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 11, 459–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrithers, C., & Bever, T.G.R. (1984). Eye-fixation patterns during reading confirms theories of language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 8, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. McK. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.P. (1969). Subroutine STEPIT — Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters. Behavioral Science, 14, 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W., & Pachella, R.G. (1984). A psychophysical approach to dimensional separability. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W.R., Hake, H.W., & Eriksen, C.W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review, 63, 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E.J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielen, S.C., Schmidt, R.A., & Van Den Heuvel, P.J.M. (1983). On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, G.C., Hersh, H., Caramazza, A., & Griffin, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B. (1984). Word recognition. In Pearson, P.D., Barr, R., Kamil, M.L., & Mosenthal, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J.A. (1969). The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese, 19, 325–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J.M. (1982). Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1979). Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 595–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1984). Building and testing models of reading processes. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W. (1985). Attention and perception: An information-integration perspective. Acta Psychologica, 60, 211–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W., & Cohen, M.M. (1983a). Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test. Speech Communication, 2, 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W., & Cohen, M.M. (1983b). Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W., & Oden, G.C. (1980). Speech perception: A framework for research and theory. In N.J. Lass (Ed.). Speech and Language: Vol. 3. Advances in Basic Research and Practice, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D.W., & Schmuller, J. (1975). Visual features, preperceptual storage, and processing time in reading. In D.W. Massaro (Ed.), Understanding Language (pp. 207–240) New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naus, M.J., & Shillman, R.J. (1976). Why a Y is not a V: A new look at the distinctive features of letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G.C. (1977). Integration of fuzzy logical information, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 565–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G.C. (1979). A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 336–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G.C. (1981). Fuzzy propositional approach to psycholinguistic problems: An application of fuzzy set theory in cognitive science. In M.M. Gupta, R.K. Ragade, & R.R. Yager (Eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G.C. (1984). Dependence, independence and emergence of word features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 394–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, G.C., & Massaro, D.W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K.L., Newsome, S.L., & Noel, R.W. (1984). Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S.E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge. In D.A. Norman & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.) Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S.E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A., Goldman, S.R., & Hogaboam, T.W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in connected discourse. Memory & Cognition, 7, 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J.R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146, 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, J.R., & Garner, W.R. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 565–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, D.H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridge, O.G. (1959). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In Symposium on the mechanisms of thought processes. London: HM Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridge, O.G., & Neisser, U. (1960, August). Pattern recognition by machine. Scientific American, 203, 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J.J. (1971). Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massaro, D.W., Hary, J.M. Addressing issues in letter recognition. Psychol. Res 48, 123–132 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309160

Keywords

Navigation