Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of ants on host plant selection by Jalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

(1) Females of the myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras are far more likely to lay eggs on plants that contain their attendant ants, Iridomyrmex sp. 25 than on plants without ants, although the clutch sizes of individual egg masses laid in either situation is the same. (2) Ovipositing females respond to the presence or absence of ants before they alight on a potential food plant. Once they have landed, they are equally likely to ley eggs whether or not they encounter ants. (3) Ovipositing females prefer to lay eggs on plants that contain ant tended homopterans than on plants that contain only a few foraging ants. The presence of ant tended homopterans can act as a strong stimulus to induce females to lay eggs on plant species that differ from their original host species. (4) Ant dependent oviposition behavior has been described or suggested in 46 species of lycaenid and one riodinid. In general, the more dependent a species is upon ants for either food or protection, the more likely it is to use ants as cues in oviposition. Prominent characteristics of lycaenids that have ant dependent oviposition are described and discussed. (5) Myrmecophilous lycaenids that may use ants as cues in oviposition feed on a significantly wider range of plants than non-myrmecophilous lycaenids. Possible reasons for this pattern and its ecological significance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe H, Teramoto Y, Ichinose T (1981) Relationship between host plant ranges of the three papilionid butterflies and oviposition-inducing contact chemicals in their host plants. Appl Entomol Ecol 16:493–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1981a) Ant-dependent food plant selection by the mistletoe butterfly Ogyris amaryllis (Lycaenidae). Oecologia (Berl) 48:60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Atsatt PR (1981b) Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for enemy-free space. Am Nat 118:638–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell TR (1915–1920) The common butterflies of the plains of India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 1915–1920

  • Benson WW (1978) Resource partitioning in passion flower butterflies. Evolution 29:659–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch C (1928) Life histories of some Victorian lycaenids. Victorian Nat 45:188–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP, Brower JVZ (1964) Birds, butterflies and plant poisons: a study in ecological chemistry. Zoologica (NY) 49:137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns AN (1931) Habits and life histories of some Victorian lycaenid butterflies. Victorian Nat 48:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns AN, Rotherham ER (1980) Australian butterflies in colour. Reed, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan CJ (1981–1982) Notes on the immature biology of two myrmecophilous Lycaenidae: Juditha molpe (Riodininae) and Panthiades bitias (Lycaeninae). J Res Lepid 20:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS, Robbins RK (1984) Egg-laying in butterflies. In: Vane Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) Biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Claassens AJM, Dickson CGC (1980) Butterflies of the Table Mountain range. Struik, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GC, Dickson CGC (1971) Life histories of the South African lycaenid butterflies. Purnell, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Common IFB, Waterhouse DF (1981) Butterflies of Australia, 2nd edn. Angus and Robertson, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell CB (1984) Aphytophagy in butterflies: its relationship to myrmecophily. Zool J Linn Soc 79:1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps C, Jackson THE (1940) The life history of Lachnocnema bibulus (Fab) in Kenya (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Trans R Entomol Soc (Lond) 90:449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels G (1976) The life history of Hypochrysops theon medocus (Fruhstorfer) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 15:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Das GM (1960) Observations on the association of ants with coccids of tea. Bull Entomol Res 50:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • David WA, Gardiner BOC (1962) Oviposition and the hatching of the eggs of Pieris brassicae L in a laboratory culture. Bull Entomol Res 53:91–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1947) Chemical insect attractants and repellants. Blakiston, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1970) Chemical interactions between plants and insects. In: Sondheimer E, Simeone JB (eds) Chemical ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 83–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson CGC (1954) Note on ovipositing of Thestor basutus (Willg) (Lep.: Lycaenidae). J Entomol Soc South Afr 17:140

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd AP (1902) Contribution to the life history of Liphyra brassolis Westw. Entomologist 35:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey JC (1962a) Host-plant relations as data for butterfly classification. Syst Zool 11:150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey JC (1962b) Myrmecophily in Plebejus (Icaricia) icarroides (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Entomol News 73:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot JN (1973) The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol 28:373–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmel TC, Emmel JF (1973) The butterflies of southern California. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles Contrib Sci 26:1–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson CO (1921) Five years' observations (1914–1918) on the bionomics of southern Nigerian insects, chiefly directed to the investigation of lycaenid life-histories and to the relation of Lycaenidae, Diptera and other insects to ants. Trans Entomol Soc (Lond) 1921:319–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P, Rosenberry L, Carter M (1983) Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies. In: Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous insects: host-seeking behavior and mechanisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 27–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris CD, Brown FM (1981) Butterflies of the Rocky Mountain states. University Oklahoma Press, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RH (1978) Butterflies of South Australia. Goverment Printer, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohawk FW (1903) The earlier stages of Lycaena arion. Entomologist 36:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda H, Kubo K, Takeshi K, Takahashi A, Takahashi M, Tanaka B, Wakabayashi M, Shirozu T (1978) Insects' life in Japan. III. Butterflies. Hoikusha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk RS (1975) Association of ants with ovipositing Lycaena rubidus (Lycaenidae). J Lepid Soc 29:261–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE (1975) Ecological consequences of a coevolved mutualism between butterflies and plants. In: Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of animals and plants. Texas Press, Austin, pp 210–240

    Google Scholar 

  • gilbert LE, Singer MC (1975) Butterfly ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 6:365–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkeswood TJ (1981) The food plants of Jalmenus evagoras (Donovan) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Aust Entomol Mag 8:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning SF (1983) Biological groups within the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). J Entomol Soc South Afr 46:65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton HE (1951) Myrmecophilous Lycaenidae and other lepidoptera — a summary. Proc Soc Land Entomol Nat Hist Soc 1951:111–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe WH (1975) The butterflies of North America. Doubleday, Garden City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwase T (1952) Remarkable observations by young Japanese lepidopterists. 3. Discovery of true ant-guest larva Nyphanda (sic) fusca. Lepid News 6:43

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwase T (1955) The sixth aberrant feeder in Japan: Spindasis takanonis (Lycaenidae). Lepid News 9:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw JCW (1905) The life history of Gerydus chinensis Felder. Trans Entomol Soc (Lond) 1905:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching RL (1981) Egg clustering and the southern hemisphere lycaenids: comments on a paper by NE Stamp. Am Nat 118:423–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitehing RL (1983) Myrmecophilous organs of the larvae and pupae of the lycaenid butterfly Jalmenus evagoras (Donovan). J Nat Hist 17:471–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Klots AR (1951) A field guide to the butterflies of North America, east of the great plains. Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamborn WA (1913) On the relationship between certain West African insects, especially ants, Lycaenidac and Homoptera. Trans Entomol Soc (Lond) 1913:436–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TB, Pittaway AR (1982) Notes on the ecology, biology and taxonomy of Aphartis acamas (Klug) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Entomol Gaz 33:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz F (1917) Der Erhaltungsgrund der Myrmekophilie. Z Indakt Abstamm Vererbungsl 18:44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Malicky H (1970) New aspects on the association between lycaenid larvae (Lycaenidae) and ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Lepid Soc 24:190–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz U, Wüst M, Schurian K (1975) Bläulingsraupen als Zuckerlieferanten für Ameisen. Oecologia (Berl) 18:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin C (1971) Australian butterflies. Nelson, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagayama H (1950) Life history of Niphanda fusca Bremer et Grey. Life Hist Insects 3:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaj DR, Rausher MD (1983) Individual variation in host location by phytophagous insects. In Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous insects: host-seeking behavior and mechanisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 77–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE (1983) The ecology and evolution of symbioses between lycaenid butterflies and ants. PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE (1984) Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants. In: Vane Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) Biology of butterflies. XI Symp R Entomol Soc (Lond). Academic Press, London, pp 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE (1985) Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for nitrogen fixing and other protein rich food plants. Am Nat (in press)

  • Pierce NE, Mead PS (1981) Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly caterpillars and ants. Science 211:1185–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1979a) Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 60:503–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1979b) Egg recognition: its advantages to a butterfly. Anim Behav 27:1034–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1980) Host abundance, juvenile survival, and oviposition preference in Battus philenor. Evolution 34:342–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross GN (1966) Life history studies on Mexican butterflies. IV. The ecology and ethology of Anatole rossi, a myrmecophilous metalmark (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 59:985–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena KN, Goyal S (1978) Host plant relations of the citrus butterfly Papilio demoleus L.: orientational and ovipositional responses. Entomol Exp Appl 24:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoonhoven LM (1972) Secondary plant substances and insects. Recent Adv Phytochem 5:197–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirozu T, Hara A (1962) Early stages of Japanese butterflies in colour. Hoikusha, Osaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1980) The dynamics of search: foodplant selection by Colias butterflies. PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1982) Searching in a patchy environment: food-plant selection of Colias philodice eriphyle butterflies. Ecology 63:839–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Symon DE (1980) The food plants of Australian butterfly larvae. J Adelaide Bot Gard 2:277–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsteinson AJ (1960) Host selection in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 5:193–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane Wright RI (1978) Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity inbutterflies. In: Mound LA, Waloff N (eds) Diversity of insect faunas. IX Symp R Entomol Soc (Lond). Blackwell, London, pp 56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams EH (1981) Thermal influences on oviposition in the montane butterfly Euphydras gillettii. Oecologia (Berl) 50:342–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Naomi E. Pierce

    Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3PS, Oxford, England

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Naomi E. Pierce

  2. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EJ, Cambridge, England

    Mark A. Elgar

Authors
  1. Naomi E. Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark A. Elgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, N.E., Elgar, M.A. The influence of ants on host plant selection by Jalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16, 209–222 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310983

Keywords

Search

Navigation