Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geographic distribution and community structure of bumblebees in the northern Iberian peninsula

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Relationships between species distribution and abundance, the influence of proboscis length on species-packing, and species associations within the local assemblages were studied in local communities of bumblebees in northern Spain along an altitudinal gradient. Local species abundance and altitudinal range occupied accounted for much of the variation in species distribution. Altitudinal range occupied by species was related to species distribution, but the most important variable accounting for species distribution was the local percentage abundance. Despite this, there was no evidence for age abundance. Despite this, there was no evidence for bimodality in the distributions of species incidence. A general trends for mean proboscis length in each locality to be greater in lowland localities exists, but this variable was not related to species distribution or abundance. Proboscis length spacings were studied among species in local assemblages and in most of the cases observed spacing did not differ from random expectations. The same patterns were demonstrated calculating spacings for ‘core’ species in each local assemblage. Furthermore, species showed little tendency towards associations, so it may be concluded that bumblebee assemblages were irregularly structured and no clear patterns emerged from the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers MA (1985) Bumble bee colonization, extinction and reproduction in subalpine meadows in northeastern Utah. Ecology 66:914–927

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1984) On the relationships between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon WJ (1983) BMDP Statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P (1983) Coevolution and pollination. In: Futuyma DJ, Slatkin M (eds) Coevolution. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts, pp 282–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1988) Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations. Oikos 53:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1988a) Patterns in body size, population dynamics, and regional distribution of bracken herbivores. Am Nat 132:662–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1988b) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations. Nature 331:709–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1989) Insect herbivores on bracken do not support the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat 134:761–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1990) Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58:329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Simberloff D (1987) The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat 130:18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982a) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core-satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38:210–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982b) Communities of bumblebees: testing the coresatellite hypothesis. Ann Zool Fenn 19:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1982c). Structure in bumblebee communities. Ann Zool Fenn 19:319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: Bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979a) Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979b) “Majoring” and “Minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: An experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM (1981) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: Hunting by expectation. Amin Behav 29:1166–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld R, Haeck J (1981) the distribution of abundance. I. Measurements. J Biogeogr 9:303–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband RW, Fischer RL, Porter WT (1980) Description and biology of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Michigan. Great Lakes Ent 13:225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW (1977) Species structure of bumblebee communities in North America and Europe. In: Mattson WJ (ed) The role of arthropods in forest ecosystem. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York. pp 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW (1980) The effect of proboscis and corolla tube lengths on patterns and rates of flower visitation by bumblebees. Oecologia 45:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordano P (1987) Patterns of mutualistic interaction in pollination and seed dispersal: Connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am Nat 129:657–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverty TM, Plowright RC (1988) Flower handling by bumblebees: A comparison of specialist and generalist. Anim Behav 36:733–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverty TM, Harder LD (1988) The bumble bees of Eastern Canada. Can Ent 120:965–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology. A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg H, Ranta E (1980) Habitat and food utilization in a subarctic bumblebee community. Oikos 35:303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Macior LW (1978) Pollination ecology of vernal angiosperms. Oikos 30:452–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer BA (1990) The relationship between distribution and abundance in a patchy environment. Oikos 58:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy ED (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton SR, Davidson DW (1988) Comparative structure of harvester ant communities in arid Australia and North America. Ecol Monogr 58:19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornosa C (1985) Los abejorros de la fauna Española. N8. Editorial de la Universidad Complutense, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen J, Gilbert FS (1989) On the abundance of hoverflies (Syrphidae). Oikos 55:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen A (1979) Morphometric, colour and enzime variation in bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus) in Fennoscandia and Denmark. Act Zool Fenn 158:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1986) The cological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Prŷs-Jones OE, Corbet SA (1987) Bumblebees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal body size in bumblebees. Oecologia 34:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1980) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: calculation of net rate of energy intake and optimal patch choice. Theor Popul Biol 17:232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1982) Local geographic distributions of bumblebees near Crested Butte, Colorado: competition and community structure. Ecology 63:555–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E (1982) Structure of North European bumblebee communities. Oikos 38:202–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E (1983) Proboscis length and the coexistence of bumblebee species. Oikos 43:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Tiainen M (1982) Structure in seven bumblebee communities in eastern Finland in relation to resource availability. Holarct Ecol 5:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Vepsalainen K (1981) Why are there so many species? Spatio-temporal heterogeneity and northern bumblebee communities. Oikos 36:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Lundberg H, Teras I (1981) Patterns of resource utilization in two Fennoscandian bumblebee communities. Oikos 36:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Lappalainen K, Miettinen H (1984) Foraging dynamics of two bumblebee species (B. lucorum and B. lapidarius) during one summer. Ann Zool Fenn 21:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM, Jensen DB, Hobbs DE, Gurevitch J, Todd JR, Schaffer V (1979) Competition, foraging energetics, and the cost of sociality in three species of bees. Ecology 60:976–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: Size ratios and competition. Evolution 35:1206–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Szyska LA, Simberloff DS (1979) Test of community-wide character displacement against null hypotheses. Evolution 33:897–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1982) On size ratios and sequences in ecological communities: Are there no rules? Ann Zool Fenn 19:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH (1988) Habitat use by bumble bees (Bombus spp.). Ecol Entomol 13:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH (1989) Why are there so many species of bumble bees at Dungeness? Bot J Linn Soc 101:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (1975) The adequacy of body size as a niche difference. Am Nat 109:769–784

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept Biología Organismos y Sistemas. Unidad de Ecología, University of Oviedo, E-33005, Oviedo, Spain

    José Ramón Obeso

Authors
  1. José Ramón Obeso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obeso, J.R. Geographic distribution and community structure of bumblebees in the northern Iberian peninsula. Oecologia 89, 244–252 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317224

Key words

Search

Navigation