Summary
An indirect effects is defined here as a reduction in prey survivorship as a consequence of a reduction in growth rate of prey due to the presence of a predator that alters prey behavior. A method for partitioning the direct and indirect effects of predators on prey survivorship indicated that predatory wasps (Polistes sp.:. Vespidae) had both direct and indirect negative effects on survivorship of buckmoth caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). In a field experiment, the direct and indirect effects together accounted for 61% of the mortality of the caterpillars. A third of this reduction in survivorship due to the wasps was attributed to an indirect effect, due to the decreased growth rate of the caterpillars that moved into the interior of the hostplant to escape from the wasps. In contrast, in another field experiment, although predatory stinkbugs (Podisus maculiventris: Hemiptera) contributed to 56% of the mortality of buckeye caterpillars (Junonia coenia: Nymphalidae), the indirect effect of stinkbugs on buckeye caterpillars only accounted for 2% of the reduction in survivorship of these caterpillars. These differences in the indirect effect are discussed in particular relative to the behavior of predators and prey, ratio of predator to prey sizes, and morphology of the hostplants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayres MP, MacLean SF Jr (1987) Molt as a component of insect development: Galerucella sagittariae (Chrysomelidae) and Epirrita autumnata (Geometridae). Oikos 48:273–279
Cain ML, Eccleston J, Kareiva PM (1985) The infuence of food plant dispersion on caterpillar searching success. Ecol Entomol 10:1–7
Cornell JC, Stamp NE, Bowers MD (1987) Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behaviour of buckmoth caterpillars, Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:383–388
Dempster JP (1983) The natural control of populations of butterflies and moths. Biol Rev 58:461–481
Dethier VG (1959) Food-plant distribution and density and larval dispersal as factors affecting insect populations. Can Entomol 91:581–596
Evans EW (1982) Influence of weather on predator/prey relations: stinkbugs and tent caterpillars. J New York Entomol Soc 90:241–246
Greenberg R, Gradwohl J (1980) Leaf surface specializations of birds and arthropods in a Panamanian forest. Oecologia 46:115–124
Heads PA (1986) The costs of reduced feeding due to predator avoidance: potential effects on growth and fitness in Ischnura elegans larvae (Odonata: Zygoptera). Ecol Entomol 11:369–377
Heinrich B (1979) Foraging strategies of caterpillars: leaf damage and possible predator avaoidance strategies. Oecologia 42:325–337
Heinrich B, Collins SL (1983) Caterpillar leaf damage, and the game of hide-and-seek with birds. Ecology 64:592–602
Morris RF (1963) The effect of predator age and prey defense on the functional response of Podisus maculiventris Say to the density of Hyphantria cunea Drury. Can Entomol 95:1009–1020
Morris RF (1972a) Predation by insects and spiders inhabiting colonial webs of Hyphantria cunea. Can Entomol 104:1197–1207
Morris RF (1972b) Predation by wasps, birds, and mammals on Hyphantria cunea. Can Entomol 104:1581–1591
Mukerji MK, LeRoux EJ (1965) Laboratory rearing of a Quebec strain of the pentatomid predator, Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Phytoprotection 46:40–60
Myers JH, Smith JNM (1978) Head flicking by tent caterpillars: a defensive response to parasite sounds. Can J Zool 56:1628–1631
Nijhout HF (1975) A threshold size for metamorphosis in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.). Biol Bull 149:214–225
Rabb RL, Lawson FR (1957) Some factors influencing the predation of Polistes wasps on the tobacco hornworm. J Econ Entomol 50:778–784
Rausher MD (1979) Egg recognition: its advantage to a butterfly. Anim Behav 27:1034–1040
Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043
Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796
Slansky F Jr, Scriber JM (1985) Food consumption and utilization. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology and biochemistry and pharmacology, vol. 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 87–163
Stamp NE (1986) Physical constraints of defense and response to invertebrate predators by pipevine caterpillars (Battus philenor: Papilionidae). J Lepid Soc 40:191–205
Stamp NE (1990) Growth versus molting time of caterpillars as a function of temperature, nutrient concentration and the phenolic rutin. Oecologia 82:107–113
Stamp NE, Bowers MD (1988) Direct and indirect effects of predatory wasps (Polistes sp.: Vespidae) on gregarious caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). Oecologia 75:619–624
Stamp NE, Bowers MD (1990) Variation in food quality and temperature constrain foraging of gregarious caterpillars. Ecology 71:1031–1039
Tautz J, Markl H (1978) Caterpillars detect flying wasps by hairs sensitive to airborne vibration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:101–110
Tilman D (1978) Cherries, ants and tent caterpillars: Timing of nectar production in relation to susceptibility of caterpillars to ant predation. Ecology 59:686–692
Tostowaryk W (1971) Life history and behavior of Podisus modestus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in boreal forest in Quebec. Can Entomol 103:662–674
Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stamp, N.E., Bowers, M.D. Indirect effect on survivorship of caterpillars due to presence of invertebrate predators. Oecologia 88, 325–330 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317574
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317574