Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0+ juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Species-habitat relationships are an important aspect of fish life history, particularly in early ontogeny. To address the lack of information on the microhabitat use/requirements of European coarse fishes, particularly 0-group fishes in riverine systems, an empirical model was generated from data collected in the River Great Ouse catchment (UK). During 7 weeks in autumn 1990, data on young-of-the-year (0+) juvenile fishes and 15 environmental variables were collected at 2800 stratified, random point samples within 130 study sites (streams, rivers, side-channels, backwaters). Of 24 species of 0+ fish, only 10 were captured in ≥ 3% of non-null samples. Association analysis and canonical correspondence analysis of the samples-by-species (967×10) and samples-by-variables (967×15) data matrices revealed that the shallow, narrow, lotic, stony-pebbly channel microhabitat of riffles and runs was preferred by the progeny of substrate-spawning, substrate/plant-spawning and nest-guarding fishes. Moderately deeper and wider, sinuous channels, with slowto-moderate water velocities and medium-sized substrata were also favourable to progeny of substrate spawners. Assemblages of 0+ fish in deeper, wider, silted, trapezoidal-shaped channels with slow-to-lentic flowing water, i.e. channelised and regulated, were dominated by ubiquitous (plant/substrate) spawners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoros C, Rostan JC, Pautou G, Bravard JP (1987) The reversible process concept applied to the environmental management of large river systems. Environ Manage 11: 607–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Finn JT (1991) Analysis of microhabitat use by fish: investigator effect and investigator bias. Rivers 2: 57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Finn JT, Booke HE (1985) Quantifying stream substrate for habitat analysis studies. N Am J Fish Manage 5: 499–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltz DM, Moyle PB, Knight NJ (1982) Competitive interactions between benthic stream fishes, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, and speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39: 1502–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes A, Gregory KJ, Dawson FH (1983) An assessment of river channelisation in England and Wales. Sci Total Environ 27: 97–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessel D, Thiolouse J, Beffy JL, Auda Y (1990) ADECO. PIREN-Vallées fluviales, URA CNRS 367, Université de Lyon I, 69622 Villeurbanne, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1989a) Electrofishing for fish larvae and 0+ juveniles: equipment modifications for increased efficiency with short fishes. Aquacult Fish Manage 20: 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1989b) The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystems. Environ Biol Fish 26: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1990a) Shifts in the microhabitat of larval and juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) in a floodplain channel. J Fish Biol 36: 683–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1990b) Effect of regulation on 0+ fish recruitment in the Great Ouse, a lowland river. Reg Rivers Res Manage 5: 251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1991) Typology of aquatic habitats in the Great Ouse, a small regulated lowland river. Reg Rivers Res Manage 6: 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH (1992) Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a lotic floodplain channel. Environ Biol Fish 33: 181–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Peňáz M (1988) Ecology of fish spawning and nursery zones in the flood plain, using a new sampling approach. Hydrobiologia 169: 209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Olivier JM, Peňáz M, Roux AL (1992) Juvenile fishes as functional describers of fluvial ecosystem dynamics: applications on the River Rhône, France. Reg Rivers Res Manage 6: 135–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin P, Caillère L (1990) Microdistribution of Cottus gobio L. and fry of Salmo trutta L. in a first order stream. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 37: 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner JL (1988) Environment sound river engineering: examples from the Thames catchment. Reg Rivers Res Manage 2: 445–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, Freeman MC (1987) Microhabitat use in a stream fish assemblage. J Zool London 212: 151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, de Sostoa A, Freeman MC, Lobon-Cerviá J (1987a) Microhabitat use in a Mediterranean riverine fish assemblage, Fishes of the lower Matarraña. Oecologia 73: 490–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, de Sostoa A, Freeman MC, Lobon-Cerviá J (1987b) Microhabitat use in a Mediterranean riverine fish assemblage, Fishes of the upper Matarraña. Oecologia 73: 501–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Guti G (1992) The population density of perch Perca Fluviatilis L. in the Cikola backwater system of the River Danube, Hungary. Hydrobiologia (in press)

  • Haberlehner E (1988) Comparative analysis of feeding and schooling behaviour of the Cyprinidae Alburnus alburnus (L., 1758), Rutilus rutilus (L., 1758), and Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L., 1758) in a backwater of the Danube near Vienna. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 73: 537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey BC, Stewart AJ (1991) Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. Oecologia 87: 336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggenes J (1988a) Substrate preferences of brown trout fry (Salmo trutta) in artificial stream channels. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45: 1801–1806

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggenes J (1988b) Effects of short-term flow fluctuations on displacement of, and habitat use by, brown trout in a small stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 117: 336–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggenes J (1991) Comparisons of habitat availability and habitat use by an allopatric cohort of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar under conditions of low competition in a Norwegian stream. Holarct Ecol 14: 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey RD (1990) Environmental river engineering. J IWEM 4: 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinch SG (1991) Small- and large-scale studies in fisheries ecology: the need for cooperation among researchers. Fisheries 16: 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinch SG, Collins NC, Harvey HH (1991) Relative abundance of littoral zone fishes: biotic interactions, abiotic factors, and postglacial colonization. Ecology 72: 1314–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DA, Somers KM (1991) Putting things in order: the ups and downs of Detrended Correspondence Analysis. Am Nat 137: 704–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Killgore KJ, Morgan II RP, Rybicki NB (1989) Distribution and abundance of fishes associated with submersed aquatic plants in the Potomac River. N Am J Fish Manage 9: 101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsolving AD, Bain MB (1990) A new approach for measuring cover in fish habitat studies. J Fresh Ecol 5: 373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kryzhanovsky SG (1949) Eco-morphological principles and patterns of development among minnows, loaches and catfishes. Part II: Ecological groups of fishes and patterns of their distribution. Akad Nauk SSSR, Tr Inst Morf Zhivotr im Akad AN Severtsova 1: 237–331 (Translation: Fish Res Bd Can Trans Series No 2945, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastochkin DA (1943) A plain river subdivision into geomorphological and biological districts on the basis of its structural and biological unity. CR (Dokl) Acad Sci USSR 41: 347–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek A, Lusk S (1965) Occurrence of fishes in relation to formation of the bed (in Czech with English summary and captions). Zool Listy 14: 225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot GW, Jones NV (1979) The relationship between the size of 0 group roach (Rutilus rutilus [L.]), their swimming capabilities, and their distribution in a river. In: Proc. 1st British Freshwater Fish Conference, University of Liverpool, pp 230–236

  • Lilliefors HW (1967) On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc 62: 399–402

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick FH, Aspinwall H (1983) Habitat selection in three species of darters. Environ Biol Fish 8: 279–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB, Baltz DM (1985) Microhabitat use by an assemblage of California stream fishes: developing criteria for in-stream flow determinations. Trans Am Fish Soc 114: 695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelva A, Persat H, Chessel D (1979) Une nouvelle méthode d'étude des peuplements ichtyologiques dans les grands cours d'eau par échantionnage ponctuel d'abondance. CR Acad Sci Paris 289 Série D: 1295–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Neveu A (1981) Densité et microrépartition des différentes espèces de poissons dans la Basse Nivelle, petit fleuve cotier des Pyrénées Atlantiques. Bull Fr Piscic 280: 86–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorff T, Hughes R (1991) Modification of an Index of Biotic Integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet RK, Knox RG, Case JS, Allen RB (1988) Putting things in order: the advantages of Detrended Correspondence Analysis. Am Nat 131: 924–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Persat H, Copp GH (1989) Electrofishing and Point Abundance Sampling for the ichthyology of large rivers. In: Cowx I (ed) Developments in Electrofishing, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Persat H, Nelva A, Chessel D (1985) Approche par l'analyse discriminante sur variables qualitatives d'un milieu lotique, le Haut-Rhône français. Acta ∄col, ∄col Gén 6: 365–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1991) Interspecific interactions. In: Winfield IJ, Nelson JS (eds) Cyprinid fishes. Systematics, Biology & Exploitation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 530–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Pialot D, Chessel D, Auda Y (1984) Description de milieu et analyses factorielle des correspondances multiples. CR Acad Sci, Paris 298: 309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivnička K, Švátora M (1988) Living together of roach and perch with respect to their competition in the Klíčava Reservoir between 1964–1986. Universitas Carolina. Environmentalica II. 1–2: 17–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts WS, Nelson RL (1989) Stream canopy and its relationship to salmonid biomass in the intermountain west. N Am J Fish Manage 9: 446–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235: 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón P, Barrachina P, Bernat Y (1992) Microhabitat use by O+ juvenile cyprinids during summer in a Mediterranean river. Arch Hydrobiol (in press)

  • Rozas LP, Odum WE (1988) Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer F, Spindler T (1989) Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Reg Rivers Res Manage 4: 397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder T (1979) Aspekte der Ökologie von Frühentwicklungsstadien einiger Fischarten in Altrhein und Labor. Diplomarbiet (M.Sc. thesis), W. Goethe University of Frankfurt/Main, Germany

  • Shirvell CS, Dungey RD (1983) Microhabitats chosen by brown trout for feeding and spawning in rivers. Trans Am Fish Soc 112: 355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankovitch S (1921) Étude sur la morphologie et la nutrition des alevins de poissons cyprinidés. Thèse de Doctorat dÉtat, Université de Grenoble, France

  • Ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg D, Ferson S, Rohlf FJ (1987) Putting things in order: a critique of detrended Correspondence Analysis. Am Nat 129: 434–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton JS, Mills CA, Pygott JR (1991) The effect of interaction between the stone loach. Noemacheilus barbatulus (L.) and the bullhead Cottus gobio (L.) on prey and habitat selection. Hydrobiologia 220: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski A (1984a) Structure of communities and biomass of ichthyofauna in the Biebrza River, its old river beds and affluents. Pol Ecol Stud 10: 447–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski A (1984b) An analysis of the ichthyofauna of the Biebrza River system. Part II. Materials to the knowledge of the ichthyofauna and review of species (in Polish, English summary). Fragm Faun (Warsaw) 28: 137–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copp, G.H. An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0+ juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment. Oecologia 91, 338–345 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317621

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317621

Key words

Navigation