Skip to main content
Log in

Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency

An experiment

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the idea that ruminants allocate their feeding time to habitat patches in relation to foraging efficiency. We used five tame red deer (Cervus elaphus) in an enclosure planted with four treatment of timothy grass (Phleum pratense) differing in their stage of growth. Older swards offered higher biomass but lower nutritional quality than younger swards. We observed time spent feeding in each treatment during each of seven trials. We measured goodness-of-fit between observed times and predictions from two alternative hypotheses differing in optimization strategy (maximizing versus matching), and a third, null hypothesis. We tested the hypotheses using two alternative currecies: digestible protein, and digestible dry matter or energy. Although digestible protein concentration and dry-matter digestibility were highly correlated (r=0.763, P<0.001), the wider range of digestible protein made it the much more sensitive measure of forage quality. Distributions of feeding time closely matched estimated intake rates of digestible protein (R sup2infPred =0.899) across all animals and trials. The other hypotheses were rejected. The results have important ecological implications in showing the underlying role of food in the selection of habitat by ruminants, and that simple, mechanistic models of forage intake and digestion can be scaled up to the level of animal behavioural choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albon SD, Langvatn R (1992) Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate. Oikos 65:502–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Gillingham MP (1985) Foraging behavior: dynamics of dining out. In: Hudson RJ, White RG (eds) Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 53–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella G (1983) Leverage and regression through the origin. Am Stat 37:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox JL (1991) Forage quality of Carex macrochaeta emerging from Alaskan alpine snowbanks through the summer. Am Midl Nat 126:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering HR, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agricultural Handbook no. 379

  • Gordon IJ (1989a) Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the Isle of Rhum. II. Vegetation community selection. J Appl Ecol 26:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ (1989b) Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the Isle of Rhum. III. Determinants of vegetation community selection. J Appl Ecol 26:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley TA (1984) Habitat patches and their selection by wapiti and black-tailed deer in a coastal montane coniferous forest. J Appl Ecol 21:423–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley TA, Robbins CT, Hagerman AE, McArthur C (1992) Predicting digestible protein and digestible dry matter in tannin-containing forages consumed by ruminants. Ecology 73:537–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Wood-Gush DGM, Eddison JC (1987) A study of the foraging behaviour of cattle grazing patchy swards. Biol Behav 12:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Clark DA, Hodgson J (1992) Discrimination and patch choice by sheep grazing grass-clover swards. J Anim Ecol 61:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Roitblat HL (1985) The ecology of foraging behavior: implications for animal learning and memory. Annu Rev Psychol 36:141–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1965) Ecology of deer range in Alaska. Ecol Monogr 35:259–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Albon SD (1986) Geographic clines in body weight of Norweigan red deer: a novel explanation of Bergmann's rule? Holarctic Ecol 9:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgantini LE, Hudson RJ (1989) Nutritional significance of wapiti (Cervus elaphus) migrations to alpine ranges in western Alberta, Canada. Arct Alp Res 21:288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould ED, Robbins CT (1981a) Nitrogen metabolism in elk. J Wildl Manage 45:323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould ED, Robbins CT (1981b) Evaluation of detergent analysis in estimating nutritional value of browse. J Wildl Manage 45:937–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould ED, Robbins CT (1982) Digestive capabilities in elk compared to white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 46:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH (1986) Classical and modern regression with applications. Duxbury Press, Boston, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins CT (1983) Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeboe B (1982) A population-genetic study of spiked grass with emphasis on content of silicon (in Norwegian). Norges landbruksvitenskaplige forskningsråd, NLVF, Report no. 412, 16 pp

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O and B Books, Corvallis, Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1974) Analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am Nat 108:290–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1978) What are the biological bases of varied diets? Am Nat 112:627–631

    Google Scholar 

  • White RG (1983) Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom ML, Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Spalinger DE, Parish SM (1984) Food intake and foraging energetics of elk and mule deer. Wildl Manage 48:1285–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilm HG, Costello DF, Klipple GE (1944) Estimating forage yield by the double sampling method. J Am Soc Agron 36:194–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langvatn, R., Hanley, T.A. Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95, 164–170 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323486

Key words

Navigation