Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of food supply on foraging behaviour in a desert spider

  • Ecophysiology
  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the alternative hypotheses that foraging effort will increase (energy maximizer model) or decrease (due to increased costs or risks) when food supply increased, using a Namib desert burrowing spider, Seothyra henscheli (Eresidae), which feeds mainly on ants. The web of S. henscheli has a simple geometrical configuration, comprising a horizontal mat on the sand surface, with a variable number of lobes lined with sticky silk. The sticky silk is renewed daily after being covered by wind-blown sand. In a field experiment, we supplemented the spiders' natural prey with one ant on each day that spiders had active webs and determined the response to an increase in prey. We compared the foraging activity and web geometry of prey-supplemented spiders to non-supplemented controls. We compared the same parameters in fooddeprived and supplemented spiders in captivity. The results support the “costs of foraging” hypothesis. Supplemented spiders reduced their foraging activity and web dimensions. They moulted at least once and grew rapidly, more than doubling their mass in 6 weeks. By contrast, food-deprived spiders increased foraging effort by enlarging the diameter of the capture web. We suggest that digestive constraints prevented supplemented spiders from fully utilizing the available prey. By reducing foraging activities on the surface, spiders in a prey-rich habitat can reduce the risk of predation. However, early maturation resulting from a higher growth rate provides no advantage to S. henscheli owing to the fact that the timing of mating and dispersal are fixed by climatic factors (wind and temperature). Instead, large female body size will increase fitness by increasing the investiment in young during the period of extended maternal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams MV, Dill LM (1989) A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology 71:999–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1982) Functional responses of optimal foragers. Am Nat 120:382–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1991) Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology 72:1242–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JF (1974) Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology 55: 576–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WD (1990) Function and phylogeny of spider webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:341–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar WD (1969) Prey and predators of the wolf spider Lycosa lububris. J Zool [Lond] 159: 405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar WD (1970) Prey and feeding behaviour of adult females of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (Clerck). Neth J Zool 20: 487–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie RG (1981) The quest for prey by the web building spider Amaurobius similis (Blackwell). Anim Behav 29:953–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Henschel JR (1994) Diet and foraging behaviour of huntsman spiders in the Namib dunes (Araneae: Heteropodidae). J Zool [Lond] 234: 239–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Henschel JR, Lubin YD (1992) Environmental factors affecting the web and activity of a psammophilous spider in the Namib Desert. J Arid Environ 22: 173–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins LE, Buskirk RE (1992) A trap-building predator exhibits different tactics for different aspects of foraging behaviour. Anim Behav 44:485–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF (1975) The food consumption of a wolf spider, Geolycosa godeffrovi, (Araneae: Lycosidae), in the Australian Capital Territory. Oecologia 18: 343–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1982) Active foragers versus sit-and-wait predators: a simple model. J Theor Biol 95:381–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw GN, Seely MK (1982) Ecology of desert organisms. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin YD (1986) Web building and prey capture in the Uloboridae. In: Shear WA (ed) Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif, pp 132–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin Y, Kotzman M, Ellner S (1991) Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in webs and websites of a desert widow spider. J Arachnol 19:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin Y, Ellner S, Kotzman M (1993) Web relocation and habitat selection in a desert widow spider. Ecology 74: 1915–1928

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin YD, Henschel JR (1990) Foraging at the thermal limit: burrowing spiders (Eresidae) in the Namib Desert dunes. Oecologia 84:461–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WA, Abramsky Z, Kotler BK, Pinshow B, Brown JS (1990) The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents: theory and experiments. Ecology 71: 844–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive CW (1982) Behavioral response of a sit-and-wait predátor to spatial variation in foraging gain. Ecology 63:912–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquet A (1984) Predatory-site selection and adaptation of the trap in four species of orb-weaving spiders. Biol Behav 9:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquet A, Ridwan A, Leborgne R (1994) Presence of potential prey affects web-building in an orb-weaving spider Zygiella xnotata. Anim Behav 47: 477–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters HM (1992) On the burrowing behaviour and the production and use of silk in Seothyra, a sand-inhabiting spider from the Namib Desert (Arachnida, Araneae, Eresidae). Verh Naturwissenschaften Ver Hamburg 33: 191–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhisiart A ap, Vollrath F (1994) Design features of the orb web of the spider, Araneus diadematus. Behav Ecol 5: 280–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE (1981) The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat 117:871–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Harp JM (1987) Nutritional ecology of spiders. In: Slansky F Jr, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, and spiders. Wiley New York, pp 645–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Luczak J (1982) Spider foraging: behavioral responses to prey. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms of ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 353–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider J (1992) Die Wurzeln des Soziallebens bei der subsozialen Spinne Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximillian-Universität, Munich, Germany

  • Seibt U, Wickler W (1987) Gerontophagy versus cannibalism in the social spiders Stegodyphus mimosarum Pavesi and Stegodyphus dumicola Pocock. Anim Behav 35: 1903–1904

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PM (1994) The orb-web: an energetic and behavioural estimator of a spider's dynamic foraging and reproductive strategics. Anim Behav 48: 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JS, Henschel JR, Lubin YD (1993) Thermal constraints of prey-capture behavior of a burrowing spider in a hot environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1988) Risk sensitivity and foraging in colonial spiders. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior. Academic Press, London, pp 353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1991) Habitat structure and spider foraging. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 325–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW (1992) Foraging strategies of spiders. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F (1985) Web spider's dilemma: a risky move or site dependent growth. Oecologia 68: 69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F (1987) Growth, foraging and reproductive success. In: Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 355–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward D, Lubin Y (1992) Temporal and spatial segregation of webbuilding in a community of orb-weaving spiders. J Arachnol 20: 73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward D, Lubin Y (1993) Habitat selection and the life history of a desert spider, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). J Anim Ecol 62: 353–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia 41: 289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1993) Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt PN, Baum R (1960) Changes in orb webs in spiders during growth (Araneus diadematus Clerck and Neoscona vertebrata McCook). Behaviour 16: 309–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lubin, Y., Henschel, J. The influence of food supply on foraging behaviour in a desert spider. Oecologia 105, 64–73 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328792

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328792

Key words

Navigation