Abstract
The research challenges the conventional usage of households' residential satisfaction as a guide for housing policy and development. A new housing indicator, ‘marginal residential improvement priority’, is introduced and is compared with residential satisfaction both theoretically and empirically. Within the context of neoclassical consumer theory it is shown that the former provides a superior indicator of households' housing preferences than the latter. It is then demonstrated empirically that these conceptual distinctions make for significant differences when the indicators are employed in a practical application. Using a sample of 971 households drawn from Wooster, Ohio, the paper considers their evaluations of four general dimensions of the residential environment and six specific features of the dwelling. Zero-order correlations between the indicators average only 0.40 across these ten dimensions. Households' relative satisfaction with these various aspects diverge substantially from the priority they place on improving these aspects in the future, with rank-order correlations not differing significantly from zero. More specifically, all household strata gave public services their lowest improvement priority and dwelling quality their highest, regardless of their relative degree of satisfaction with the dimension. Similarly, most groups gave high priority to improving interior condition and room size and low priority to improving exterior condition, independent of their satisfaction. Thus, if the efficacy of a limited amount of resources invested in a housing policy is to be maximized, they should not necessarily be directed toward those features of the residential environment with which households are least satisfied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Birch David, et al.: America's Housing Needs: 1970–1980 (MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies, Cambridge).
Campbell Angus, Philip Converse and Willard Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russel Sage Foundation, New York).
Cooper Clare: 1975, Easter Hill Village: Some Social Implications of Design, (Free Press, New York).
Couper Mary and Timothy Brindley: 1975, ‘Housing classes and housing values’, Sociological Review 23, pp. 563–576.
Craik Kenneth and Ervin Zube: 1975, Issues in Perceived Environmental Quality Research (Institute for Man and Environment, University of Massachusetts, Amherst).
Foote Nelson, et al.: 1960, Housing Choices and Housing Constraints (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Galster George: 1980, Consumers' Housing Satisfaction, Improvement Priorities, and Needs (Center for Real Estate Education and Research, Ohio State University, Columbus).
Galster George and Garry Hesser: 1975, Wooster: Its People, Its Homes and Its Problems (Department of Planning, Wooster).
Galster George and Garry Hesser: 1981, ‘Residential satisfaction: contextual and compositional correlates’, Environment and Behavior 16, pp. 737–758.
Hempel Donald and Lewis Tucker: 1979, ‘Citizen preferences for housing as community social indicators’, Environment and Behavior 11, pp. 399–428.
Hinshaw Mark and Kathryn Allot: 1972, ‘Environmental preferences of future housing consumers’, Journal of American Institute of Planners 37, pp. 102–107.
Kain John and John Quigley: 1970, ‘Measuring the value of housing quality’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, pp. 532–548.
Koo Anthony and Peter Schmidt: 1974, ‘Cognitive range in the theory of revealed preferences’, Journal of Political Economy 84, pp. 174–179.
Ladd Florence: 1972, ‘Black youths view their environment’, Journal of American Institute of Planners 38, pp. 108–116.
Lancaster Kelvin: 1966, ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy 74, pp. 132–157.
Lansing John, Robert Marans and Robert Zehner: 1970, Planned Residential Environments (Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).
Lawton M. Powell: 1980, ‘Housing the elderly: residential quality and residential satisfaction’, Research on Aging 2, pp. 309–328.
Michelson William: 1976, Man and His Urban Environment (Addison-Wesley, Reading).
Michelson William: 1977, Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction (Oxford University Press, New York).
Morris, E., S. Crull and M. Winter: 1976, ‘Housing norms, housing satisfaction and the propensity to move’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 38, pp. 309–320.
Muellbauer John: 1974, ‘Household production theory, quality, and the ‘Hedonic technique’’. American Economic Review 64, pp. 977–994.
Newman Sandra and Greg Duncan: 1979, ‘Residential problems, dissatisfaction and mobility’, Journal of the American Planning Association 45, pp. 254–162.
Onibokun Adepoju: 1974, ‘Evaluating consumers' satisfaction with housing’, Journal of American Institute of Planners 40, pp. 189–200.
President's Commission on Housing: 1982, The Report of the President's Commission on Housing (USGPO, Washington).
Quigley John and Daniel Weinberg: 1977, ‘Intra-Urban residential mobility: a review and synthesis’, International Regional Science Review 2, pp. 41–66.
Ratcliff Richard: 1966, ‘Housing standards’, in Urban Housing, ed. by W. Wheaton, G. Milgram, M. Meyerson (Free Press, New York), pp. 391–394.
Rent George: 1975, Low-Income Housing in South Carolina: Factors Related to Residential Satisfaction (Clemson University, Clemson).
Rosen Sherwin: 1974, ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets’, Journal of Political Economy 92, pp. 34–55.
Sanoff Henry and Man Sawhney: 1971, Residential Livability (Urban Affairs and Community Service, North Carolina State University, Raleigh).
Speare Alden: 1974, ‘Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility’, Demography 11, pp. 173–188.
Speare Alden, Sidney Goldstein and William Frey: 1974, Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change (Ballinger, Cambridge).
Varady David: 1983, ‘Determinants of residential mobility decisions’, Journal of the American Planning Association 49, pp. 184–199.
Western John, P. Weldon and T. Haung: 1974, ‘Housing and satisfaction with environment in Singapore’, Journal of American Institute of Planners 40, pp. 201–208.
Williams, J. Allen: 1971, ‘The multifamily housing solution and housing type options’, Social Science Quarterly 52, pp. 543–559.
Wurster, Catherine Bauer: 1966, ‘Social questions in housing and community planning’, in Urban Housing, ed. by W. Wheaton, G. Milgram, M. Meyerson (Free Press, New York), pp. 30–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galster, G.C. Evaluating indicators for housing policy: Residential satisfaction vs marginal improvement priorities. Soc Indic Res 16, 415–448 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333289
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333289