Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europeaus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth

  • Community Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions among protozoa (mixed cultures of ciliates, flagellates and naked amoebae), bacteria-feeding nematodes (Pellioditis pellio Schneider) and the endogeic earthworm species Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny) were investigated in experimental chambers with soil from a beechwood (Fagus sylvatica L.) on limestone. Experimental chambers were planted with the grass Hordelymus europeaus L. (Poaceae) and three compartments separated by 45-μm mesh were established: rhizosphere, intermediate and non-rhizosphere. The experiment lasted for 16 weeks and the following parameters were measured at the end of the experiment: shoot and root mass of H. europaeus, carbon and nitrogen content in shoots and roots, density of ciliates, amoebae, flagellates and nematodes, microbial biomass (SIR), basal respiration, streptomycin sensitive respiration, ammonium and nitrate contents, phosphate content of soil compartments. In addition, leaching of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and leachate pH were measured at regular intervals in leachate obtained from suction cups in the experimental chambers. Protozoa stimulated the recovery of nitrifying bacteria following defaunation (by chloroform fumigation) and increased nitrogen losses as nitrate in leachate. In contrast, protozoa and nematodes reduced leaching of phosphate, an effect ascribed to stimulation of microbial growth early in the experiment. Earthworms strongly increased the amount of extractable mineral nitrogen whereas it was strongly reduced by protozoa and nematodes. Both protozoa and nematodes reduced the stimulatory effect of earthworms on nitrogen mineralization. Microbial biomass, basal respiration, and numbers of protozoa and nematodes increased in the vicinity of the root. Protozoa generally caused a decrease in microbial biomass whereas nematodes and earthworms reduced microbial biomass only in the absence of protozoa. None of the animals studied significantly affected basal respiration, but specific respiration of microorganisms (O2 consumption per unit biomass) was generally higher in animal treatments. The stimulatory effect of nematodes and earthworms, however, occurred only in the absence of protozoa. The sensitivity of respiration to streptomycin suggested that protozoa selectively grazed on bacterial biomass but the bacterial/fungal ratio appeared to be unaffected by grazing of P. pellio. Earthworms reduced root biomass of H. europaeus, although shoot biomass remained unaffected, and concentrations of nitrogen in shoots and particularly in roots were strongly increased by earthworms. Both nematodes and protozoa increased plant biomass, particularly that of roots. This increase in plant biomass was accompanied by a marked decrease in nitrogen concentrations in roots and to a lesser extent in shoots. Generally, the effects of protozoa on plant growth considerably exceeded those of nematodes. It is concluded that nematodes and protozoa stimulated plant growth by non-nutritional effects, whereas the effects of earthworms were caused by an increase in nutrient supply to H. europaeus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphei J, Scheu S (1993) Effects of biocidal treatments on biological and nutritional properties of a mull-structured woodland soil. Geoderma 56:435–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Alphei J, Bonkowski M, Scheu S (1995) Application of the selective inhibition method to determine bacterial:fungal ratios in three beechwood soils rich in carbon — optimization of inhibitor concentrations. Biol Fert Soils 19:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1973) Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration. Arch Microbiol 93:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1975) Measurement of bacterial and fungal contributions to respiration of selected agricultural and forest soils. Can J Microbiol 21:314–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1980) Quantities of plant nutrients in the microbial biomass of selected soils. Soil Sci 130:211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1990) Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem 22:251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RV, Elliott ET, McClellan JF, Coleman DC, Cole CV, Hunt HW (1978) Trophic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. III. Biotic interactions of bacteria, amoebae, and nematodes. Microb Ecol 4:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RV, Coleman DC, Cole CV, Elliott ET (1981) Effect of the nematodes Acrobeloides sp. and Mesodiplogaster lheritieri on substrate utilisation and nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization in soil. Ecology 62:549–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Bååth E, Lohm U, Lundgren B, Rosswall T, Söderström B, Sohlenius B (1981) Impact of microbial-feeding animals on total soil activity and nitrogen dynamics: a soil microcosm experiment. Oikos 37:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Baermann G (1917) Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ancylostomum-(Nematoden)-Larven in Erdproben. Geneesk Tijdschr Ned-Indië 57:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis JP, Cherrett JM, Ford JB (1986) A survey of the invertebrates feeding on living clover roots (Trifolium repens L.) using 32P as a radiotracer. Pedobiologia 29:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonkowski M, Schaefer M (1995) Interactions between earthworms and soil protozoa in the soil-root interface: a new component in the soil food web Soil Biol Biochem (in press)

  • Boström S, Sohlenius B (1986) Short-term dynamics of nematode communities in arable soil. Influence of a perennial and an annual cropping system. Pedobiologia 29:345–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W, Coleman DC (1989) A simple method for measuring CO2 in a continuous air-flow system: modifications to the substrate-induced respiration technique. Soil Biol Biochem 21:385–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1981) Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil — impact and importance. Microb Ecol 7:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1985a) Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 17:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1985b) Possible roles for roots, bacteria, protozoa and fungi in supplying nitrogen to plants. In: Fitter AH (eds) Ecological interactions in soil. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 355–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DC, Cole CV, Anderson RV, Blaha M, Campion MK, Clarholm M, Elliott ET, Hunt HW, Shaefer B, Sinclair J (1977) An analysis of rhizosphere-saprophage interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Bull 25:299–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortez J, Bouché MB (1992) Do earthworms eat living roots? Soil Biol Biochem 24:913–915

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The rhizosphere. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash MC, Senapati BK, Mishra CC (1980) Nematode feeding by tropical carthworms. Oikos 34:322–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn J, Hüttermann A (1994) Humus disintegration and nitrogen mineralization. In: Godbold DL, Hüttermann A (eds) Effects of acid rain on forest processes. Wiley, New York, pp 129–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET, Coleman DC, Cole CV (1979) The influence of amoebae on the uptake of nitrogen by plants in gnotobiotic soil. In: Harley JJ, Russell RS (eds) The soil-root interface. Academic Press, London, pp 221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET, Anderson RV, Coleman DC, Cole CV (1980) Habitable pore space and microbial trophic interactions. Oikos 35:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno CF, Popenoe H (1964) Gamma irradiation compared with steam and methyl bromide as a soil sterilizing agent. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 28:533–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster RC, Dormaar JF (1991) Bacteria-grazing amoebae in situ in the rhizosphere. Biol Fert Soils 11:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS (1986) Mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus by mixed cultures of the ciliate protozoan Colpoda steinii, the nematode Rhabditis sp. and the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 18:637–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS (1989) Enhanced nitrification in the presence of bacteriophagous protozoa. Soil Biol Biochem 21:1045–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS (1990) A comparison of microbial feeding nematodes and protozoa in the rhizosphere of different plants. Biol Fert Soils 9:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Young IM, Boag B (1991) Nematodes associated with the rhizosphere of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Pedobiologia 35:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Habte M, Alexander M (1978) Mechanisms of persistence of low numbers of bacteria preyed upon by protozoa. Soil Biol Biochem 10:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimi J, Huhta V, Boucelham M (1992) Growth increase of birch seedlings under the influence of earthworms — a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1525–1528

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitkamp U, Schauermann J (1982) Modifikationen zur Substratextraktion der Enchytraeidae mit einer Wassertauchmethode. Mitt Sonderforschungsbereich 135:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Helal HM, Sauerbeck D (1983) Method for studying turnover processes in soil layers of different proximity to roots. Soil Biol Biochem 15:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerkamp M, Rogaar H, Eijsackers JP (1983) Effect of earthworms on grassland and recently reclaimed polder soils in the Netherlands. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 85–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhta U, Haimi J, Setälä H (1991) Role of the fauna in soil processes: techniques using simulated forest floor. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingestad T (1982) Relative addition rate and external concentration: driving variables used in plant nutrition research. Plant Cell Environ 5:443–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC (1985) Interactions of bacteria, fungi and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol Monogr 55:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effect of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol Biochem 8:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentschke G, Bonkowski M, Godbold DL, Scheu S (1995) Soil protozoa and forest tree growth: non-nutritional effects and interactions with mycorrhizae. Biol Fert Soils 20:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1982) Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analyses. part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 643–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman PJ, Veen JA van (1989) The impact of protozoa on the availability of bacterial nitrogen to plants. Biol Fert Soils 8:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman PJ, Jansen AG, Veen JA van, Zehnder AJB (1990) Protozoan predation and the turnoven of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the presence of plants. Biol Fert Soils 10:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebuhn M, Heilmann B, Hartmann A (1994) Effects of drying/rewetting stress on microbial auxin production and L-tryptophan catabolism in soils. Biol Fert Soils 18:302–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Levrat P, Pussard M, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C (1991) Regulation of Fusarium oxysporum populations introduced into soil: the amoebal predation hypothesis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 86:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1986) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher DA Campbell CL (1994) Nematode communities and microbial biomass in soils with annual and perennial crops. Appl Soil Ecol 1:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolyuk VF (1969) Some aspects of the study of soil protozoa. Acta Protozool 7:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 403–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Page FC (1976) An illustrated key to freshwater and soil amoebae Scientific publication 34). Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee RW, Ehrenfeld JG, Tate RL III (1993) Effects of pine roots on microorganisms, fauna, and nitrogen availability in two soil horizons of a coniferous forest spodosol. Biol Fert Soils 15:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Roessner J (1986) Untersuchungen zur Reduktion von Nematoden im Boden durch Regenwürmer. Meded Fac Landbouww Rijksuniv Gent 51:1311–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ (1980) Evaluation of a physiological method for measuring microbial biomass in soil from grasslands and maize fields. N Z J Sci 23:229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouatt JW, Katznelson H (1961) A study of the bacteria on the root surface and in the rhizosphere soil of crop plants. J Appl Bacteriol 24:164–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouelle J (1983) Introduction of amoebae and Rhizobium japanicum into the gut of Eisenia foetida (Sav.) and Lumbricus terrestris L. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 375–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira A.D. (1969): Plant root exudates. Bot Rev 35:35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer M (1991) Fauna of the European temperate deciduous forest. In: Röhrig E, Ulrich B (eds) Temperate deciduous forests (Ecosystems of the world 7). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 503–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1987a) Microbial activity and nutrient dynamics in earthworm casts (Lumbricidae). Biol Fert Soils 5:230–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1987b) The influence of earthworms (Lumbricidae) on the nitrogen dynamics in the soil litter system of a deciduous forest. Oecologia 72:197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1990) Changes in microbial nutrient status during secondary succession and its modification by earthworms. Oecologia 84:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1992) Automated measurement of the respiratory response of soil microcompartments: Active microbial biomass in earthworm faeces. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1113–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1993) Analysis of the microbial nutrient status in soil microcompartments: earthworm faeces from a basalt-limestone gradient. Geoderma 56:575–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1994) There is an earthworm mobilizable nitrogen pool in soil. Pedobiologia 38:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994a) Effects of invasion of an aspen forest (Canada) by Dendrobaena octaedra (Lumbricidae) on plant growth. Ecology 75:2348–2361

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Parkinson D (1994b) Changes in bacterial and fungal biomass, C, bacterial and fungal biovolume and ergosterol content after drying, remoistening and incubation of different layers of cool temperate forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1515–1525

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen SM, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1984) Mineralisation and immobilisation of the nitrogen in fumigated soil and the measurement of microbial biomass nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 16:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN (1946) A method of estimating the number of soil protozoa, especially amoebae, based on their different feeding on bacteria. Ann Appl Biol 33:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlenius B (1968) Studies of the interactions between Mesodiplogaster sp. and other rhabditid nematodes and a protozoan. Pedobiologia 8:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson W (1942) On the culturing of Rhabditis terrestris. Parasitology 34:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdill SMJ (1959) Earthworms improve pasture growth. N Z J Agric 98:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar JC, Marschner H (1994) Phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere and hyposphere of a VA mycorrhizal wheat supplied with inorganic and organic phosphorus. Soil Biol Biochem 26:387–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JP (1990) Soil sterilization methods to show VA-mycorrhizae aid phosphorus and zinc nutrition of wheat in vertisols. Soil Biol Biochem 22:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich B (1987) Stability, elasticity and resilience of terrestrial ecosystems with respect to matter balance. In: Schulze ED, Zwölfer H (eds) Potentials and limitations of ecosystem analysis (Ecological studies 61). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 11–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen FJM, Hageman PEJ, Woldendorp JW, Laanbroek HJ (1994) Competition for ammonium between nitrifying bacteria and plant roots in soil in pots: effects of grazing by flagellates and fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 26:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley R, Ritz K, Griffiths B (1990) Microbial biomass and mineral N transformations in soil planted with barley, rye-grass, pea or turnip. Plant Soil 127:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters V, Jörgensen RG (1992) Microbial carbon turnover in beech forest soils worked by Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny)(Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Soil Biol Biochem 24:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters V, Stickan W (1991) Resource allocation of beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.) — relationschip to earthworm activity and soil conditions. Oecologia 88:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods LE, Cole CV, Elliott ET, Anderson RV, Coleman DC (1982) Nitrogen transformations in soils as affected by bacterial-microfaunal interactions. Soil Biol Biochem 14:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW (1981) Soil nematode populations depressed in the presence of earthworms. Pedobiologia 22:191–195

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung Ökologie, II Zoologisches Institut, Berliner Strasse 28, 37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Jörn Alphei, Michael Bonkowski & Stefan Scheu

Authors
  1. Jörn Alphei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Bonkowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Scheu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alphei, J., Bonkowski, M. & Scheu, S. Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europeaus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 106, 111–126 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334413

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334413

Key words

Search

Navigation