Abstract
A model is proposed that permits the prediction of contrast detection thresholds for arbitrary spatial patterns. The influence of the inhomogeneous structure of the visual field and a form of spatial integration are incorporated in the model. A hypothetical density function for the spatial sampling units, which specifies the distribution of these units with respect to both size and location, is described. The density function is compared with anatomical and electrophysiological knowledge of the density of retinal and cortical receptive fields. This density function permits a particularly lucid interpretation in terms of pattern processing. It can be considered as a system that permits simultaneous global and focal views of the surroundings. The density function, together with a schematized adaptation behaviour of single units, and an incoherent summation rule permit us to calculate a measure of the mass response, and consequently the threshold function. Predictions of the model are compared with recently obtained psychophysical data. In particular an explanation is offered for certain invariance properties of spatial contrast detection that seems to possess promising generality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstis, S.M.: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Res. 14, 589–592 (1974)
Bouman, M.A., Ampt, C.G.F.: Fluctuation theory in vision and its mechanistic model. In: Performance of the eye at low luminances. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series No. 125, 1965
Doorn, A.J. van, Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A.: The influence of the retinal inhomogeneity on the perception of spatial patterns. Kybernetik 10, 223–230 (1972)
Drasdo, N.: The neural representation of visual space. Nature 266, 554–556 (1977)
Enroth-Cugell, C., Shapley, R.M.: Flux, not retinal illumination, is what cat retinal ganglion cells really care about. J. Physiol. 233, 311–326 (1973)
Enroth-Cugell, C., Lennie, P.: The control of retinal ganglion cell discharge by receptive field surrounds. J. Physiol. 247, 551–578 (1975)
Fischer, B., May, H.U.: Invarianzen in der Katzenretina: Gesetzmäßige Beziehungen zwischen Empfindlichkeit, Größe und Lage rezeptiver Felder von Ganglienzellen. Exp. Brain Res. 11, 448–464 (1970)
Fischer, B., Krause, D., May, H.U.: Schwellenerregung, zeitliche Summation und Impulsreaktionsfunktion in der Retina der Katze: Temporale rezeptive Felder retinaler Ganglienzellen. Exp. Brain Res. 15, 212–224 (1972)
Fischer, B.: Overlap of receptive field centers and representation of the visual field in the cat's optic tract. Vision Res. 13, 2113–2120 (1973)
Hay, G.A., Chesters, M.S.: A model of visual threshold detection. J. theor. Biol. 67, 221–240 (1977)
Hoekstra, J., Goot, D.P.J. van der, Brink, G. van den, Bilsen, F.A.: The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. Vision Res. 14, 365–368 (1974)
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size scatter, and magnification factor. J. Comp. Neurol. 158, 295–305 (1974)
Ikeda, H., Tremain, K.E.: The development of spatial resolving power of lateral geniculate neurones in kittens. Exp. Brain Res. 31, 193–206 (1978)
Kelly, D.H.: Adaptation effects on spatiotemporal sine-wave thresholds. Vision Res. 12, 89–101 (1972)
Kelly, D.H.: Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina. Vision Res. 15, 665–672 (1975)
Koenderink, J.J., Grind, W.A. van de, Bouman, M.A.: Foveal information processing at photopic luminances. Kybernetik 8, 128–144 (1971)
Koenderink, J.J.: Current models of contrast processing. In: Spatial Contrast, Report of a workshop held in Amsterdam, 1976. Spekreijse, H., Tweel, L.H. van der, eds. Amsterdam-Oxford-New York: North-Holland 1977
Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A., Bueno de Mesquita, A.E., Slappendel, S.: Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. I. The near peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0–8°). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 845–849 (1978a)
Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A., Bueno de Mesquita, A.E., Slappendel, S.: Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. II. The far peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0–50°). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 850–854 (1978b)
Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A., Bueno de Mesquita, A.E., Slappendel, S.: Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 854–860 (1978c)
Koenderink, J.J., Bouman, M.A., Bueno de Mesquita, A.E., Slappendel, S.: Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patters. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 860–865 (1978)
Koenderink, J.J., Doorn, A.J. van: Detectability of power fluctuations of temporal visual noise. Vision Res. 18, 191–195 (1978e)
Matin, L., Kornheiser, A.: Linked changes in spatial integration, size discrimination, and increment threshold with change in background diameter. Vision Res. 16, 847–860 (1976)
Mostafavi, H., Sakrison, D.J.: Structure and properties of a single channel in the human visual system. Vision Res. 16, 957–968 (1976)
Nachmias, J.: Theoretical approaches: method of analysis. In: Spatial Contrast, Report of a workshop held in Amsterdam, 1976. Spekreijse, H., Tweel, L.H. van der, eds. Amsterdam-Oxford-New York: North-Holland 1977
Pirchio, M., Spinelli, D., Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L.: Infant contrast sensitivity evaluated by evoked potentials. Brain Res. 141, 179–184 (1978)
Pirenne, M.H., Denton, E.J.: Accuracy and sensitivity of the human eye. Nature 170, 1039–1042 (1952)
Quick, R.F., Jr., Hamerly, J.R.: The absence of a measurable “critical band” at low suprathreshold contrasts. Vision Res. 16, 351–355 (1976)
Richards, W.: Spatial remapping in the primate visual system. Kybernetik 4, 146–156 (1968)
Riseman, E.M., Arbib, M.A.: Computational techniques in the visual segmentation of static scenes. Comp. Graph. Image Proc. 6, 221–276 (1977)
Robson, J.G.: Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141–1142 (1966)
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V., Näsänen, R.: Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision. Nature 271, 54–56 (1978)
Schade, O.H.: Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 721–739 (1956)
Schwartz, E.L.: Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: analytic structure and relevance to perception. Biol. Cybernetics 25, 181–194 (1977)
Wilson, M.E.: Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field. J. Physiol. 207, 611–622 (1970)
Wilson, H.R., Giese, S.C.: Threshold visibility of frequency gradient patterns. Vision Res. 17, 1177–1190 (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J. Visual detection of spatial contrast; Influence of location in the visual field, target extent and illuminance level. Biol. Cybernetics 30, 157–167 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337144
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337144