Skip to main content
Log in

Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in a canine metaphyseal defect model: radiographic-biomechanical correlation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiographic and biomechanical assessment of a new type of bone graft substitute derived from reef-building sea coral was performed in a canine metaphyseal defect model. Blocks of this material and autogenous iliac crest graft were implanted, respectively, into the right and left proximal tibial metaphyses of eight dogs. Qualitative and quantitative radiographic evaluation was performed in the immediate postoperative period and at 6 months after surgery. Biomechanical testing was carried out on all grafts following harvest at 6 months, as well as on nonimplanted coralline hydroxyapatite and autogenous iliac cancellous bone. In contrast to autografts, incorporation of coralline implants was characterized by predictable osseous growth and apposition with preservation of intrinsic architecture. Greater percent increase in radiographic density, higher ultimate compressive strength, and lower stiffness with incorporation were documented advantages of coralline hydroxyapatite over autogenous graft. Densitometric measurements correlated moderately with strength for both types of graft material (r=-0.65). These promising results have important implications to the clinical application of coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes as an alternative to autogenous grafting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bajpai PK (1983) Biodegradable scaffolds in orthopaedic, oral, and maxillofacial surgery. In: Rubin LR (ed) Biomaterials in reconstructive surgery. CV Mosby, St Louis, p 312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chiroff RT, White EW, Weber JN, Roy DM (1975) Tissue ingrowth of replamineform implants. J Biomed Mater Res 6:29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson EG, Dutton RO, Dickstein HL (1982) The fate of bone substitution with porous hydroxyapatite implants in the dog spine. Orthop Trans 6:25

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn EJ, White EW (1976) Bone ingrowth in replamineform porous implants. In: Williams D (ed) Biocompatibility of implant materials. Pitman Medical Publishers, Kent, p 80

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eysel W, Roy DM (1975) Topotactic reaction of aragonite to hydroxyapatite. Z Kristallogr 141:11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Finn RA, Bell WH, Brammer JA (1980) Interpositional “grafting” with autogenous bone and coralline hydroxyapatite. J Maxillofac Surg 8:217

    Google Scholar 

  7. Genant HK, Cann CE, Ettinger B, Gordan GS (1982) Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med 97:699

    Google Scholar 

  8. Genant HK, Cann CE, Boyd DP, Kolb FO, Ettinger B, Gordan GS (1983) Quantitative computed tomography for vertebral mineral determination. In: Frame B, Potts JT (eds) Clinical disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. Excerpta Medica. Amsterdam Oxford Princeton, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes RE (1979) Bone regeneration within a coralline hydroxyapatite implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:626

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holmes RE, Salyer KE (1978) Bone regeneration in a coralline hydroxyapatite implant. Surg Forum 24:611

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes R, Mooney V, Bucholz R, Tencer A (1984) A coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Preliminary report. Clin Orthop 188:252

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jarcho M (1981) Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop 157:259

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mooney V, Holmes R (1982) A new bone graft substitute. In: Uhthoff HK (ed) Current concepts of external fixation of fractures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 425

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piecuch JF, Topazian RG (1982) Results of experimental ridge augmentation with porous hydroxyapatite implants: a preliminary report. Acta Stomatol Int 3:67

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piecuch JF, Topazian RG, Skoly S, Wolfe S (1983) Experimental ridge augmentation with porous hydroxyapatite implants. J Dent Res 62:148

    Google Scholar 

  16. Piecuch JF, Goldberg AJ, Shastry C, Chrzanowski RB (1984) Compressive strength of implanted porous replamineform hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 18:39

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roy DM, Linnehan SK (1974) Hydroxyapatite formed from coral skeletal carbonate by hydrothermal exchange. Nature 247:220

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sartoris DJ, Sommer FG, Kosek J, Gies A, Carter D (1985) Dual-energy projection radiography in the evaluation of femoral neck strength, density, and mineralization. Invest Radiol 20:476

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sartoris DJ, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH, Holmes RE, Resnick D (1986) Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes: preliminary report of radiographic evaluation. Radiology 159:133

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sartoris DJ, Holmes RE, Bucholz RW, Mooney V, Resnick D (1986) Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in a canine metaphyseal defect model: radiographic-histometric correlation. Invest Radiol (in press)

  21. Torgalkar AM (1979) A resonance frequency technique to determine elastic modulus of hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 13:907

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weber JN, White EW (1973) Carbonate materials as precursors to new ceramic and polymer materials for biomedical applications. Min Sci Eng 5:151

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weber JN, White EW, Lebiedzik J (1971) New porous biomaterials by replication of echinoderm skeletal microstructures. Nature 233:337

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wells JW (1967) Scieractinia. In: Moore RC (ed) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. University Kansas Press, Kansas City, p 328

    Google Scholar 

  25. White RA, Weber JN, White EW (1972) Replamineform: a new process for preparing porous ceramic, metal, and polymer prosthetic materials. Science 176:922

    Google Scholar 

  26. White EW, Weber JN, Roy DM, Owen EL, Chiroff RT, White RA (1975) Replamineform porous biomaterials for hard tissue implant applications. J Biomed Mater Res Symp 6:23

    Google Scholar 

  27. White RA, White EW, Nelson RJ (1979) Uniform microporous biomaterials prepared by the replamineform technique. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs 7:127

    Google Scholar 

  28. White RA, Shors E, White EW (1981) Uniform microporous biomaterials prepared from marine skeletal precursors. Proc Int Coral Reef Symp 2:95

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sartoris, D.J., Holmes, R.E., Tencer, A.F. et al. Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes in a canine metaphyseal defect model: radiographic-biomechanical correlation. Skeletal Radiol 15, 635–641 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349860

Key words

Navigation