Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of traditional, cluster and Zürich-Montpellier analyses of infaunal pelecypod associations from two adjacent sediment beds

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Zürich-Montpellier analysis provided more detailed information about pelecypod associations in two sediment beds than either a traditional subjective approach or a cluster analysis based on Jaccard's coefficient. The Zürich-Montpellier test separated till and sand pelecypod associations, and indicated distinguishing species and atypical samples. Species distinguishing the till association were Cardita ventricosa, Yoldia myalis, Semele rubropicta, Venerupis kennerlyi, Clinocardium nuttallii, Nuculana minuta and Macoma incongrua. Species distinguishing the sand were Macoma elimata, Compsomyax subdiaphana, Yoldia ensifera, Macoma calcarea, M. lipara, M. brota, Yoldia limatula and Macoma alaskana. Two samples contained species from both associations plus some species rare elsewhere. Combined R-and Q-type grouping procedures, of which the Zürich-Montpellier approach is an example, are useful in evaluating benthic faunal similarities, but the suitability of various forms of the procedure needs further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bouyoucos, G. J.: A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron. J. 43, 434–438 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnill, R. M. and D. V. Ellis: The distribution and ecology of sublittoral species of Macoma (Bivalvia) off Moresby Island and in Satellite Channel, near Victoria, British Columbia. Veliger 12, 207–219 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fager, E. W.: Communities of organisms. In: The sea, Vol. II, pp 415–437. Ed. by M. N. Hill. New York: Interscience, Wiley 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. McGowan: Zooplankton species groups in the North Pacific. Science, N.Y. 140, 453–460 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, A. W.: Vegetation mapping, 472 pp. New York: Ronald 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, U. and J. C. Kelley: Benthic infauna communities off the coast of Washington and in Puget Sound: identification and distribution of the communities. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 27, 621–651 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. G. J.: Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and their importance to marine zoogeography. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn. 21, 42–68 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and P. H. A. Sneath: Principles of numerical taxonomy, 359 pp. San Francisco: Freeman 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, G.: Bottom communities. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 67, 461–534 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by T. R. Parsons, Nanaimo

Supported by the Defense Research Board of Canada, Grant No. 9520-23. Based on a thesis submitted by J. D. Popham to the University of Victoria in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of B.Sc. (Honours).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popham, J.D., Ellis, D.V. A comparison of traditional, cluster and Zürich-Montpellier analyses of infaunal pelecypod associations from two adjacent sediment beds. Marine Biology 8, 260–266 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355224

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355224

Keywords

Navigation