Skip to main content
Log in

Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Science educators and those who investigate science learning have tended, for good reason, to focus their attention on students' conceptual development, Such a focus is, however, too narrow to provide full and proper understanding of the complexities of original science learning. Recently developmental cognitive psychologists have called on the work of postpositivistic philosophers of science, especially Thomas Kuhn, to bolster their research into conceptual development in science acquisition. What these psychologists have not recognized is that Kuhn's position is actually a derivative of Wittgenstein's methodological nominalism, a viewpoint far more favorable to behaviorism than cognitive psychology. After drawing out some of the consequences of this fact for the developmental cognitive psychologist program for studying science learning, we suggest our own radical alternative. Drawing on Floden, Buchmann and Schwille's idea of “Breaking with Everyday Experience” we propose an alternative notion of original science learning in terms of Alfred Schutz's modification of Williams James' many worlds thesis. The many worlds thesis will allow us to better understand students' difficulty in learning idealized worlds such as science, worlds that represent a discontinuous break with ordinary everyday practical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, Peter: 1986, ‘Wittgenstein and the Authority of Science’, in The Tasks of Contemporary Philosophy (Proceedings of the 10th International Wittgenstein Symposium), Werner Leinfellner and Franz M. Wuketits (eds.), Hölder-Pichler-Tempskey, Vienna, pp. 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Peter: 1982, ‘Uncle Ludwig's Book about Science’, Philosophical Topics (Supplement, Vol. 12, 1982). Proceedings of the Southeastern Philosophical Society, 1980, pp. 71–78.

  • Berlyne, D.E.: 1962, ‘Uncertainty and Epistemic Curiosity’, British Journal of Psychology 53, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Shelley: 1987, ‘Beyond Critical Thinking: Teaching for Synthesis’, Forum 6, (1).

  • Carroll, Lewis: 1971, Alice's Adventures In Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass: And What Alice Found There, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, John: 1982: ‘Student's Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics’, American Journal of Physics 50 (1).

  • Dewey, John: 1926, Experience and Nature, Open Court Publishing Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1938, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, H. Holt & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John: 1944 (original 1916), Democracy and Education, Macmillan Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, Peter: 1986, Embracing Contraries, Oxford, New York.

  • Elliott, David L. and Nagel, Kathleen C.: 1987, ‘School Science and the Pursuit of Knowledge — Deadends and All’, Science and Children 24, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floden, Robert E., Buchmann, Margret, and Schwille, John R.: ‘Breaking with Everyday Experience’, Teachers College Record 88, 485–506.

  • Freie, John: 1988, ‘Methodological Belief in the University Classroom’, Forum 6, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei: 1957, ‘The Assayer’, in Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, transl. by Sillman Drake, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei: 1974, Two New Sciences, transl, by Stillman Drake, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Thomas F.: 1964, ‘A Topology of the Teaching Concept’, Studies in Philosophy and Education 3. Reprinted in Joe Partz (ed.), Selected Readings in Philosophy of Education, Macmillan, New York, 1974.

  • Harms, N.C.: 1981, ‘Project Synthesis: Summary and Implications for Teachers’, in N.C. Harms and R.E. Yager (eds.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 3, National Science Teachers Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, Carolyn: 1987, ‘Through the Magnifying Glass’, Science and Children 25, 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund: 1970, The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology, transl. by David Carr, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, James: 1950, The Principles of Psychology, Volume Two, Chapter XXI ‘The Perception of Reality’, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, Thomas R.: 1984, ‘Is There Substantial Agreement on the Goals for Science Instruction? If So, What Are They’, in Research Within Reach: Science Education, D. Holdzkom and P.B. Lutz (eds.), Appalachian Educational Laboratory, Charleston, W. Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S.: 1977, ‘A Function for Thought Experiments’, in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 240–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry: 1978, Progress and Its Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry: 1983, Science And Values, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, C.J.B.: 1983, ‘On Certainty and Indoctrination’, Synthese 56, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravisik, Julius: 1971, ‘Learning As Recollection’, in Plato: A Collection of Essays, Gregory Vlastos (ed.), Anchor Books, Garden City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, Ilka: 1978, ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments on The Structuralist Approach’, in Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, And Galileo's Methodology, Vol. I, J. Hintikka, D. Grunder, and E. Agazzi (eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, Jean: 1969, The Child's Conception of the World, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, George J., Strike, Kenneth A., Hewson, Peter W., and Gertzog, William A: 1982, ‘Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change’, Science Education 66, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O.: 1953, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. Kay and McGlathery, G.: 1977, ‘Science and Creative Writing’, Science and Children 14 (4).

  • Rorty, Richard: 1967, The Linguistic Turn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, A. and Sanders, Judith A.: 1984, Teaching Creativity through Metaphor, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred: 1962, Collected Works, I: The Problem of Social Reality, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneider, Cary and Pulos, Steven: 1983, ‘Children's Cosmographies: Understanding the Earth's Shape and Gravity’, Science Education 67, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, Robert E. and Easley, Jr., J.A.: 1978, Case Studies in Science Education, Center for Instructional Research and Cirriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois.

  • Vosniodou, Stella and Brewer, William F.: 1987, ‘Theories of Knowledge and Restructuring in Development’, Review of Educational Research 52 (2).

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958, Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed.), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1972, On Certainty, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M.C.: 1981, ‘Educational Implications of Recent Brain Research’, Educational Leadership 39 (1), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, Robert E., Aldridge, B.G., and Penick, J.E.: 1983, ‘Current Practice: School Science Today’, in Science Teaching: A Profession Speaks, F.K. Brown and D.P. Butts (eds.), National Science Teachers Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrison, J.W., Bentley, M.L. Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience. Stud Philos Educ 10, 19–35 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367685

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367685

Key Words

Navigation