Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum structural design and robust active control using singular value constraints

  • Originals
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a methodology for simultaneously designing a minimum weight structure and robust active controls to reduce vibrations in an aircraft structure due to external disturbances. The design problem is posed as a mathematical optimization problem with the principal objective function being the weight of the structure. The robust control design is achieved by specifying appropriate constraints on singular values of the closed-loop transfer matrices. The control approach selected for this purpose is based on designing a dynamic compensator that simultaneously minimizes the upper bound of a quadratic performance index H 2 and the H norm of a disturbance transfer function of a multi-input/multi-output system. The controller can tolerate both real parameter uncertainty in the structural frequencies and damping, and unmodelled dynamics. The design variables are the crosspsectional areas of the structure and the parameters used in the design of a control system. The method was applied to three structures idealized with membrane elements, shear panels and bar elements with embedded actuators and sensors simulating an active flexible aircraft wing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BandaS. S.; YehH. H.; HeiseS. A. 1991: Robust Control of Uncertain Systems with Combined H and LQG Optimization. Int. J. Systems Sc. 22: 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Belegundu, A. D.; Berke, L.; Patniak, S. N. 1993: An Optimization Program Based on Method of Feasible Directions-Theory and User's Guide. NASA Report, June 1993

  • ChiangR. Y.; SafonovM. G. 1992: H Synthesis Using a Bilinear Pole Shifting Transform,” J. of Guidance Control and Dynamics. 15: 1111–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, R. L.; Doyle, J. C.; Stein, G. 1990: Lecture Notes for the Workshop on H and μ Methods for Robust Control. American Control Conference, San Diego CA

  • GrandhiR. V.; HaqI.; KhotN. S. 1991: Enhanced Robustness in Integrated Structural/Control Systems Design. AIAA Journal. 29: 1168–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • HaftkaR. T.; MartinovicA.; HallauerJr.W. L. 1985: Enhanced Vibration Controllability by Minor Structural Modifications. AIAA Journal. 23: 1260–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • JayasuriyaS.; YanivO.; NwokahO. D.; ChaitY. 1992: Benchmark Problem Solution by Quantitative Feedback Theory. J. of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 15: 1087–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • KhotN. S. 1988: Structures/Control Optimization to Improve the Dynamic Response of Space Structures. Computational Mechanics. 3: 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Khot, N. S. 1992: Consideration of Robustness in Optimum Structural and Control Design. Presented at the Fourth AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland OH

  • KhotN. S.; VeleyD. E. 1992: Robustness Characteristics of Optimum Structural/Control Design. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 15: 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Khot, N. S.; Öz, H. 1993: Structural-Control Optimization with H 2 and H Constraints. Presented at the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, La Jolla CA: 1429–1436

  • KhotN. S.; HeiseS. A. 1994: Consideration of Plant Uncertainties in the Optimum Structural-Control Design. AIAA J., 32: 610–615

    Google Scholar 

  • LimK. B.; JunkinsJ. L. 1989: Robust Optimization of Structural and Controller Parameters. J. Guidance. 12: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • LustR. V.; SchmitL. A. 1988: Control Augmented Structural Synthesis. AIAA 26: 86–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghami, P. G.; Joshi, S. M.; Armstrong, E. S. 1993: An Optimization-Based Integrated Controls-Structures Design Methodology for Flexible Space Structures. NASA Technical Paper 3283

  • RaoS. S. 1988: Combined Structural and Control Optimization of Flexible Structures. Engineering Optimization. 13: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • SalamaM.; GarbaJ.; DemesetzL. 1988: Simultaneous Optimization of Controlled Structures. Computational Mechanics. 3: 275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Öz, H.; Khot, N. S. 1994: Optimization for Efficient Structure-Control Systems. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 17:

  • WieB.; LiuQ.; ByunK. W. 1992: Robust H Control Synthesis Method and its Application to Benchmark Problems. J. of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 15: 1140–1148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by S. N. Atluri, 12 January 1995

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khot, N.S. Optimum structural design and robust active control using singular value constraints. Computational Mechanics 16, 208–215 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369782

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369782

Keywords

Navigation