Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lessons from Pseudo Scotus

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1975, Entailment (Princeton U.P.).

  • Brady, R.: (forthcoming), ‘The depth relevance of some paraconsistent logics’, Studia Logica.

  • Carroll, L.: 1895, ‘What the tortoise said to Achilles’, Mind, N.S. IV, 1895. Reprinted in: Reading on Logic, ed by I. M. Copi and J. Gould.

  • Copeland, B. J.: 1980, ‘The trouble Anderson and Belnap have with relevance’, Philosophical Studies 37, pp. 325–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.: 1979, ‘Implication and relevance’, Philosophical Studies 36, pp. 137–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1962, Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago U.P.).

  • Mates, B.: 1965, ‘Psuedo Scotus on the soundness of “Consequentiae”‘ in Logic and Methodology, ed. by A-T. Tymieniecka (North Holland).

  • Meyer, R.K., Routley, R., and Dunn, J. M.: 1979, ‘Curry's paradox’, Analysis 39, pp. 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G.: 1979, ‘Two dogmas of Quineanism’, Philosophical Quarterly 29, pp. 288–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G.: 1979a, ‘Logic of paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, pp. 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G.: 1980, ‘Sense, entailment and Modus Ponens’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, pp. 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G.:(forthcoming), ‘Classical logic aufgehoben’, in Paraconsistent Logic, ed. by G. Priest and R. Routley.

  • Priest, G. and Read, S.: (forthcoming), ‘Merely confused supposition’, Franciscan Studies.

  • Read, S.: 1979, ‘Self reference and validity’, Synthese 42, pp. 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R.: 1977, ‘Ultralogic as universal?’, Relevance Logic Newsletter 2, pp. 50–90, 187–205. Reprinted as Appendix 1 in Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond, RSSS (Australian National University 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R. and Meyer, R. K.: (forthcoming), Relevant Logics and their Rivals.

  • Routley, R. and Routley, V.: 1972, ‘Semantics of first degree entailment’, Noûs 6, pp. 335–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Australia, Australia

    Graham Priest & Richard Routley

  2. Australian National University, Australia

    Graham Priest & Richard Routley

Authors
  1. Graham Priest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Routley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Priest, G., Routley, R. Lessons from Pseudo Scotus. Philos Stud 42, 189–199 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374033

Search

Navigation