Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The cost of copepod reproduction: increased susceptibility to fish predation

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    We describe a laboratory investigation to determine how the possession of egg sacs by a freshwater copepod influences the likelihood of its capture by both efficient (bream) and inefficient (roach) zooplanktonivorous fish.

  2. 2.

    For both predators the reaction distance was greater for the larger, more visible ovigerous prey than for nonovigerous copepods.

  3. 3.

    Copepods spent more time stationary, in contact with the substrate, when a fish was present. The more susceptible ovigerous individuals were generally less active than nonovigerous individuals even in the absence of predators. The likely adaptive significance of this behaviour in the natural environment is discussed.

  4. 4.

    The inefficient zooplanktonivorous fish had a significantly increased attack efficiency on ovigerous prey because their egg sacs reduced acceleration and manoeuvrability. Attack efficiency was only marginally enhanced in the case of the more efficient predator.

  5. 5.

    The energy value of ovigerous prey, expressed in terms of biomass consumed per unit handling time, was greater than for non-ovigerous individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, Blades PI (1975) (a) Reaction distance to zooplankton by Lepomis gibbosus. Verh Int Verein Limnol 19:2493–2497

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, Blades PJ (1975) (b) Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol Oceanogr 20:571–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, Howick GL, Corzette MH, Kramer SL, Fitzgibbon S, Landesberg R (1978) Visual predation by planktivores. Oikos 31:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner RW, Strickler R, O'Brien WJ (1978) Capture probability: The role of zooplankter escape in selective feeding of planktivorous fish. J Fish Res Board Can 35:1370–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont HJ, Van de Velde I, Dumont S (1975) The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda, and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia (Berlin) 19:75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers DM (1977) The nature of prey selection by planktivorous fish. Ecology 58:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Feifarek BP, Wyngaard GA, Allan JD (1983) The cost of reproduction in a freshwater copepod. Oecologia (Berlin) 56:166–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DJ, Threlkeld ST, Burns CW, Crowley PH (1976) The sizeefficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:177–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrbacek J (1962) Species composition and the amount of zooplankton in relation to fish stocks. Rozpr Cesk Akad Ved 72:1–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellors WK (1975) Selective predation of ephippial Daphnia and the resistance of ephippial eggs to digestion. Ecology 56:974–980

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Slade NA, Vinyard GL (1976) Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 57:1304–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom O (1980) Selective feeding by baltic herring. Hydrobiologia 69:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hughes RN (1981) Maximising net energy returns from foraging. In: Townsend CR, Calow P (eds) Physiological ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 86–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuorinen I, Rajasilta M, Salo J (1983) Selective predation and habitat shift in a copepod species—support for the predation hypothesis. Oecologia (Berlin) 59:62–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka M (1962) On the resting stage and mode of life of some species of Cyclopoida. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 10:215–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield IJ (1983) An experimental approach to the understanding of prey selection by young cyprinid fish. Proc 3rd Brit Freshw Fish Conf, pp 236–244

  • Winfield IJ, Peirson G, Cryer M, Townsend CR (1983) The behavioural basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abramis brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)). Freshw Biol 13:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DI, O'Brien WJ (1982) Differential location of Chaoborus larvae and Daphnia by fish: the importance of motion and visible size. Am Midl Nat 108:68–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM, Kerfoot WC (1975) Fish predation on Bosmina longirostris: body-size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology 56:232–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1980) The effect of prey motion on planktivore choice. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire USA, pp 594–603

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich, UK

    Ian J. Winfield & Colin R. Townsend

Authors
  1. Ian J. Winfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colin R. Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winfield, I.J., Townsend, C.R. The cost of copepod reproduction: increased susceptibility to fish predation. Oecologia 60, 406–411 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376860

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376860

Keywords

Search

Navigation