Skip to main content
Log in

Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Can bees accurately gauge accumulating bodily pollen as they harvest pollen from flowers? Several recent reports conclude that bees fail to assess pollen harvest rates when foraging for nectar and pollen. A native nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium Cavanilles) that is visited exclusively for pollen by both solitary and social bees (eg. Ptiloglossa and Bombus) was studied in SE Arizona and SW New Mexico. The flowers have no nectaries. Two experiments were deployed that eliminated “pollen feedback” to the bees by experimentally manipulating flowers prior to bee visits. The two methods were 1) plugging poricidal anthers with glue and 2) emptying anthers of pollen by vibration prior to bee visitation. Both experiments demonstrated that bees directly assess pollen harvest on a flower-by-flower basis, and significantly tailor their handling times, number of vibratile buzzes per flower and grooming bouts according to the ongoing harvest on a given flower. In comparison to experimental flowers, floral handling times were extended for both Bombus and Ptiloglossa on virgin flowers. Greater numbers of intrafloral buzzes and numbers of times bees groomed pollen and packed it into their scopae while still on the flower were also more frequent at virgin versus experimental flowers. Flowers with glued andreocia received uniformly brief visits from Bombus and Ptiloglossa with fewer sonications and virtually no bouts of grooming. Curtailed handling with few buzzes and grooms also characterized visits to our manually harvested flowers wherein pollen was artificially depleted. Sonicating bees respond positively to pollen-feedback while harvesting from individual flowers, and therefore we expect them to adjust their harvesting tempo according to the currency of available pollen (standing crop) within Solanum floral patches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers KAW (1975) The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 62:633–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL (1978) Vibratile (“Buzz”) Pollination in Angiosperms with Poricidally Dehiscent Anthers. Ph.D. dissertation in Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA., p 238

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL (1983) Buzz Pollination in Angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, Van Nostrand-Rheinhold Inc., N.Y., pp 73–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL (1985) Bees Use Vibration to Aid Pollen Collection from Non-Poricidal Flowers. J Kans Entomol Soc 58(3):517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL (1986) Vibratile Pollination in Solanum and Lycopersicon: A Look at Pollen Chemistry. In: D'Arcy WG (ed) Solanaceae Systematic and Biology, Columbia University Press, pp 237–252

  • Buchmann SL, Hurley JP (1978) A Biophysical Model for Buzz Pollination in Angiosperms. J Theor Biol 72:639–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann SL, Jones CE, Colin LJ (1977) Vibratile Pollination of Solanum douglasii and S. xanti (Solanaceae) in Southern California. Wasmann J Biol 35(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Buchmann (1989) Novel Pollen-Harvesting Behavior by the Bee Protandrena mexicanorum (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). J Insect Behavior 2(3):431–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Payne JA (1988) Foraging ecology of the bee Habropoda laboriosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae), an oligolege of blueberries (Ericaceae: Vaccinium) in the southeastern United States. Ann Entomol Soc Am 81(3):419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris JA (1905) The dehiscence of anthers by apical pores. Missouri Bot Gard 16th Ann Rept 167–257

  • Haynes J, Mesler M (1985) Pollen foraging by bumblebees: Foraging patterns and efficiency on Lupinus polyphyllus. Oecologia 61:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges CM, Miller RB (1981) Pollinator Flight Directionality and the Assessment of Pollen Returns. Oecologia 50:376–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley EG, Cazier MA (1963) Further observations on bees which take pollen plants of the genus Solanum. J Kans Entomol Soc 51:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O (1988) Bumble Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Assess Pollen Availability in Anemonopsis macrophylla (Ranunculaceae) Through Floral Shape. Ann Ent Soc Am 81(5):792–797

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 ed. SAS Institued Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. 2nd ed., W.H. Freeman and Co., NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1978) Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In: The Pollination of Flowers by Insects (Linnean Soc. Symp. Series No. 6) pp 89–96

  • Zimmermann M (1982) Optimal Foraging: Random Movement by Pollen Collection Bumblebees. Oecologia 53:394–398

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchmann, S.L., Cane, J.H. Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers. Oecologia 81, 289–294 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377073

Key words

Navigation