Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feeding selectivity in relation to territory size in a herbivorous reef fish

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Territory size in the herbivorous reef fish, Parma victoriae, (Pisces: Pomacentridae) is primarily determined by local density patterns and is independent of changes in food levels (Norman and Jones 1984). However, while individual readily expand territories in response to having their neighbours removed, they appear not to increase total food consumption. Individuals with large territories may benefit from improved food quality. Here we test the hypothesis that expanded territories increase access to preferred food types.

A preliminary comparison of the relative proportions of algal species consumed and those present in the field indicated that feeding was highly selective. Strong feeding preferences were indicated by a field ‘cafeteria’ experiment, in which algal species were presented to individuals in equal amounts. Selectivity indices calculated from diet and availability measures were positively correlated with the feeding preference rankings.

Individuals examined from two territory size categories (<10 m2 and > 10 m2) did not exhibit significant differences in feeding prefernces. However, they differed greatly in terms of the makeup of their diets. Higher ranking algae such as Champia zostricola and Rhodoglossum sp. were consumed in greater proportions on large territories. Algal abundances within territories also differed for the two groups. Some of the less abundant, high ranking food species were found in greater quantities per unit area on large territories. The differences in diet were not solely explained by changes in availability. The appropriate comparison showed that whereas individuals on large territories fed in a highly selective manner, those on small territories consumed algae in proportion to their availability. A neighbour removal experiment supported the hypothesis that territory expansion results in an increase in the consumption of preferred algal species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blois C, Cloarec A (1983) Density-dependent prey selection in the water stick insect, Ranatra linearis (Heteroptera). J Anim Ecol 52:849–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1964) The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull 76:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter FL, Macmillen RE (1976) Threshold model of feeding territoriality and a test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194:639–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Chess JR (1979) Some procedures for assessing organisms associated with rocky substrata. In: Lipovisky SJ, Simenstad CA (eds), Gutshop'78, Fish food habit studies, Proc. 2nd Pacific Northwest Tech. Workshop, Washington Sea Grant Publ., Univ of Washington, Seattle, pp 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64:1297–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock MJW (1978) The assessment of preference. J Anim Ecol 47:805–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan P (1979) Is a super-territory strategy stable? Am Nat 114:604–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977) Prey selection and the search strategy of the spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata): A field study on optimal foraging. Anim Behav 25:1016–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1978) An energy-based model of optimal feeding-territory size. Theor Pop Biol 14:396–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole JP (1980) Food density and territory size: An alternative model and a test on a reef fish (Eupomacentrus leucostictus). Am Nat 115:492–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Elner RW, Hughes RN (1978) Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J Anim Ecol 47:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzblau MA, Collins JP (1980) Test of a hypothesis of territory regulation in an insectivorous bird by experimentally increasing prey abundance. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass CL (1979) Territory regulation, tenure and migration in rufous hummingbirds. Can J Zool 57:914–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass CL, Angehr G, Centa J (1976) Regulation of food supply by feeding territoriality in the rufous hummingbird. Can J Zool 54:2046–2054

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty T (1979) On the benefits of agression: The adaptiveness of inhibition and super-territories. Am Nat 114:605–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB, Wolf LL (1975) Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology 56:333–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1980) Food production and competitor density as determinants of feeding territory size. Am Nat 115:510–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA, Carpenter FL, Paton DC (1983) Territory area, flower density, and time budgeting in hummingbirds: An experimental and theoretical analysis. Am Nat 122:366–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn MH (1983) Optimal diets in complex environments: feeding strategies of two herbivorous fishes from a temperate rocky intertidal zone. Oecologia (Berlin) 58:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RN (1980) Optimal foragoing theory in the marine context. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 18:423–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index. Oecologia (Berlin) 14:413–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GP (1981) Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilar JA, Lou RM (1984) Ecological and behavioral studies of the decorator crab Microphrys bicornutus Latreille (Decapoda: Brachyura): A test of optimal foraging theory. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 74:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1978) Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of migrant rufous hummingbirds. Ecology 59:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR and Davies NB (eds), Behavioural ecology; an evolutionary approach, Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Erichsen JT, Webber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacher TE Jr, Willig MR, Mares MA (1982) Food preference as a function of resource abundance with multiple prey types: An experimental analysis of optimal foraging theory. Am Nat 120:297–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PA (1978) Fisheries management: An essay for ecologists. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9:57–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechowicz MJ (1982) The sampling characteristics of electivity indices. Oecologia (Berlin) 52:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1984) Territoriality in variable environments: A simple model. Am Nat 124:641–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Conners PG, Pitelka FA (1981) Optimal territory size and the sanderling: Compromises in a variable environment. In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD (eds), Foraging behavior. Ecological, ethological and psychological approaches, Garland, New York, pp 135–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman MD, Jones GP (1984) Determinants of territory size in the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae. Oecologia 61:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo JE (1979) Indices of food type preference by a predator. J Fish Res Bd Can 36:470–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM, Pleasants BY (1979) The super-territory hypothesis: A critique, or why are there so few bullies. Am Nat 114:609–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajasilta M, Vuorinen I (1983) A field study of prey selection in planktivorous fish larvae. Oecologia (Berlin) 59:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Schantz T von (1984) Spacing strategies, kin selection, and population regulation in altricial vertebrates. Oikos 42:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. Am Nat 121:608–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss RE (1979) Reliability estimates for Ivlev's electivity index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Trans Am Fish Soc 108:344–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1979) On the adaptive significance of territoriality: a comment. Am Nat 113:772–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderploeg HA, Scavia D (1979) Two electivity indices for feeding with special reference to zooplankton grazing. J Fish Res Bd Can 36:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J (1977) On the adaptive significance of territoriality. Am Nat 111:769–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe JM (1984) Food preference, food quality and diets of three herbivorous gastropods (Trochidae: Tegula) in a temperate kelp forest habitat. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf LL (1969) Female territoriality in a tropical hummingbird. Auk 86:490–504

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. G. P. Jones

    Present address: School of Biological Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia

  2. M. D. Norman

    Present address: ‘Norgunyah’, Larnach Rd, 3911, Baxter, Victoria, Australia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    G. P. Jones & M. D. Norman

Authors
  1. G. P. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. D. Norman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, G.P., Norman, M.D. Feeding selectivity in relation to territory size in a herbivorous reef fish. Oecologia 68, 549–556 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378770

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378770

Keywords

Search

Navigation