Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of territory size in the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Factors governing the size of territories defended by the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae, were investigated, prompted by contradictory predictions in the literature concerning the effects of food supply and competitors. Observations were carried out over the non-breeding period (March–October) on a medium density population in which territories were partially contiguous. The territory size of adult fish varied between 3 and 26 m2, and was inversely correlated with local densities of conspecifics. The same range in territory size was found for both males and females, which did not differ in the time they spent on territory defence and foraging activities. No correlation existed between territory size and the abundance of algal food, body size, age or time spent on territory defence. Also, there was little variation in territory size over time, despite seasonal changes in the abundance of food algae.

Experimental reduction of food supplies on isolated territories of males and females had no effect on territory size. In a higher density habitat an experiment was carried out in which population density and food abundance were simultaneously manipulated. This showed that territory size was primarily determined by intraspecific interactions, as territories exhibited considerable increases in size upon removal of neighbours. No changes in the size of defended areas resulted from either artificial increases or decreases of food levels. There were also no changes in the time spent on defence of territories, foraging time or feeding rates associated with food manipulations or territory expansion, which suggested that food was not a limited resource. This conflicted with current theories proposed to explain territory defence and expansion. It is hypothesized that intraspecific interactions constrain territory size well below the optimum in terms of the abundance of preferred food algal species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong JT (1965) Breeding home range in the nighthawk and other birds; its evolutionary and ecological significance. Ecology 46:619–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Assem J van den (1967) Territory in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. An experimental study in intraspecific competition. Behav Suppl 16:1–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker MC, Mewaldt LR (1979) The use of space by white-crowned sparrows: Juvenile and adult ranging patterns and home range versus body size comparisons in an avian granivore community. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Black R (1971) Hatching success in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in relation to changes in behavior during the parental phase. Anim Behav 19:532–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1975) The evolution of behavior. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J (1981) Super-territories: A comment. Am Nat 118:578–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan P (1979) Is a super-territory strategy stable? Am Nat 114:604–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Ecological questions about territorial behaviour. In: Krebs JR, and Davies NB (eds), Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 317–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt AA, Hublé J (1968) Age and territory in the great tit (Parus m. major L.). Angewandte Ornithologie 3:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1978) An energy-based model of optimal feeding-territory size. Theor Pop Biol 14:396–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM, Ydenberg RG, Fraser AHG (1981) Food abundance and territory size in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Zool 59:1801–1809

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon KL (1956) Territoriality and survival in the plain titmouse. Condor 58:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole JP (1980) Food density and territory size: An alternative model and a test on the reef fish (Eupomacentrus leucostictus). Am Nat 115:492–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW, Carpenter FL (1978) Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird. Oecologia (Berlin) 31:277–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald PW, Hunt GL, Warner M (1980) Territory size in Western gulls: Importance of intrusion pressure, defence invements and vegetation structure. Ecology 61:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzblau MA, Collins JP (1980) Test of a hypothesis of territory regulation in an insectivorous bird by experimentally increasing prey abundance. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty T (1979) On the benefits of aggression: The adaptiveness of inhibition and super-territories. Am Nat 114:605–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris RN (1979) Aggression, super-territories and reproductive success in tree swallows. Can J Zool 55:2072–2078

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1980) Food production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. Am Nat 115:510–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1981) An experimental analysis of territoriality in the California reef fish Embiotoca jacksoni (Embiotocidae). Copeia 1981:653–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA (1982) Energy maximisers and time minimers: theory and reality. Am Nat 119:596–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GP (1981) Spawning-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GP (1983) The influence of habitat and behavioural interactions on the local distribution of the wrasse, Pseudolabrus celidotus. Env Biol Fish 9:in press

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1978) Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of migrant rufous humming birds. Ecology 59:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1971) Territory and breeding density in the great tit, Parus major. Ecology 52:2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson RJ (1980) Territorial behavior of the black and yellow rockfish and gopher rockfish (Scorpaenidae, Sebastes). Mar Biol 58:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Leum LL, Choat JH (1980) Density and distribution patterns of the temperate marine fish Cheilodactylus spectabilis (Cheilodactylidae) in a reef environment. Mar Biol 57:327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie JD (1966) Territory in small carnivores. Symp Zool Soc Lond 18:143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean SF Jr, Seastedt TR (1979) Avian territoriality: sufficient resources of interference competition. Am Nat 114:308–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares MA, Lacher TE, Willig MR, Bitar NA, Adams R, Klinger A, Tazik D (1982) An experimental analysis of social spacing in Tamias striatus. Ecology 63:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Connors PG, Pitelka FA (1979) Territory size in winterling sanderlings: The effects of prey abundance and intruder density. The Auk 96:551–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Conners PG, Pitelka FA (1981) Optimal territory size and the sanderling: Compromises in a variable environment. In: Kamil AC and Sargent TD (eds), Foraging Behavior. Ecological, ethological and psychological approaches, Garland, New York, pp 135–158

  • Nursall JR (1977) Territoriality in redlip blennies (Ophioblennius atlanticus — Pisces: Blenniidae). J Zool 182:205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Kuenzler EJ (1955) Measurement of territory and home range size in birds. The Auk 72:128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeke HVS, Herz MJ, Gallagher JE (1971) Changes in aggressive interaction in adjacently territorial convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum): a study of habituation. Anim Behav 40:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM, Pleasants BY (1979) The super-territory hypothesis: a critique, or why there are so few bullies. Am Nat 114:609–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Pearson CA (1971) Correlation of age, size of territory, plumage and breeding success in white-crowned sparrows. Condor 73:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Root RB (1969) The behavior and reproductive success of blue-grey gnatcatcher. Condor 71:16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross RM (1978) Territorial behavior and ecology of the anemone fish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam. Z Tierpsychol 46:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF (1975) Patterns of use of space in a guild of territorial reef fishes. Mar Biol 29:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. Am Nat 121:608–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW, Schoener A (1980) Densities, sex ratio and population structure in four species of Bahamian Anolis lizards. J Anim Ecol 49:19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW, Schoener A (1982) Intraspecific variation in home range size in some Anolis lizards. Ecology 63:809–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon CA (1975) The influence of food abundance on territory size in the iguanid lizard Sceloporus jarrovi. Ecology 56:993–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaney PA, Northcote TG (1974) Effects of prey abundance on density and territorial behavior of young rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in laboratory stream channels. J Fish Res Board Can 31:1201–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson J (1973) The role of the territory in the ecology of the intertidal limpet Lottia gigantea (Gray). Ecology 54:1020–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ (1981) The effect of extra food on small rodent populations: I. Deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Anim Ecol 50:111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1981) The effect of extra food on small rodent populations: II. Voles (Microtus townsendii). J Anim 50:125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1979) On the adaptive significance of territoriality: comment. Am Nat 113:772–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner J (1977) On the adaptive significance of territoriality. Am Nat 111:769–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A, Miller GR (1971) Territority size and aggression in a fluctuating red grouse population. J Anim Ecol 40:367–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh DA (1975) Savannah sparrow breeding and territoriality on a Nova Scotia dune beach. Auk 92:235–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1981) Animal social behavior. Duxbury, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, M.D., Jones, G.P. Determinants of territory size in the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae . Oecologia 61, 60–69 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379090

Keywords

Navigation