Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ethics of psychoactive ads

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many of today's ads work by arousing the viewer's emotions. Although emotion-arousing ads are widely used and are commonly thought to be effective, their careless use produces a side-effect: the psychoactive ad. A psychoactive ad is any emotion-arousing ad that can cause a meaningful, well-defined group of viewers to feel extremely anxious, to feel hostile toward others, or to feel a loss of self-esteem. We argue that, because some ill-conceived psychoactive ads can cause harm, ethical issues must arise during their production. Current pretesting methods cannot identify the potentially psychoactive ads; therefore, we offer some tentative guidelines for reducing the number of viewers harmed by psychoactive ads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A., Douglas M. Stayman, and Michael R. Hagerty: 1986, ‘Warmth in Advertising: Measurement, Impact, and Sequence Effects’, Journal of Consumer Research 12, 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. Hampton, Igor Grant, Caroline J. Kennedy, Douglas D. Richman, Stephen A. Spector, and J. Allen McCutchan: 1988, ‘Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders among Men Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus’, Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 859–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Marian Chapman and Julie A. Edell: 1989, ‘The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition’, Journal of Marketing Research 26, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, John J. and Robert E. Wilkes: 1980, ‘Fear Appeals to Segments Only’, Journal of Advertising Research 20, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, Joanne, Dean Ziemke, and Glenn G. Sparks: 1984, ‘Effect of Forewarning on Emotional Responses to a Horror Film’, Journal of Broadcasting 28, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., G. D'Imperio, A. Gentilomo, A. Mammucari, P. Renzi, and G. Travaglia: 1987, ‘The Intrusive Commercial: Influence of Aggressive TV Commercials on Aggression’, European Journal of Social Psychology 17(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter: 1973, Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edell, Julie A. and Marian Chapman Burke: 1987, ‘The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects’, Journal of Consumer Research 14, 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, David H.: 1988, ‘Why We Watch Certain Commercials’, TV Guide 36(8), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J.: ‘Gender Differences in Advertising Response and Self-Consciousness Variables’, Sex Roles 16, 215–225.

  • LaTour, Michael S. and Shaker A. Zahra: 1989, ‘Fear Appeals as Advertising Strategy: Should They Be Used?’, The Journal of Consumer Marketing 6(2), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizerski, Richard W. and J. Dennis White: 1986, ‘Understanding and Using Emotions in Advertising’, The Journal of Consumer Marketing 3(4), 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, Michael W.: 1986, ‘Social Support, Life Events, and Depression During Pregnancy and the Puerperium’, Archives of General Psychiatry 43, 569–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, Roger K., Scott P. Orr, Dennis F. Forgue, Jacob B. de Jong, and James M. Claiborn: 1987, ‘Psychophysiologic Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Imagery in Vietnam Combat Veterans’, Archives of General Psychiatry 44, 970–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychology Today: 1985, ‘Advertising: Sold on Emotion’, 19 (3), 9.

  • Regier, Darrel A., Jeffrey H. Boyd, Jack D. Burke, Donald S. Rae, Jerome K. Myers, Morton Kramer, Lee N. Robins, Linda K. George, Marvin Karno, and Ben Z. Locke: 1988, ‘One-Month Prevalence of Mental Disorders in the United States’, Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 977–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Michael L., Ester Thorson, Byron Reeves, Judith E. Hirsch, and Robert Goldstein: 1986, ‘EEG Activity and the Processing of Television Commercials’, Communication Research 13, 182–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Alex, Bryon Adinoff, Laurie Roehrich, Danuta Lamparski, Robert Custer, Valerie Lorenz, Maria Barbaccia, Alessandro Guidotti, Erminio Costa, and Markku Linnoila: 1988, ‘Pathological Gambling’, Archives of General Psychiatry 45, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Homer E. and Resa Moinpour: 1972, ‘Fear Appeals in Marketing: A Social Perspective’, Journal of Marketing 36(3), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, David W. and David H. Furse: 1982, ‘Applying Psychophysiological Measures to Marketing and Advertising Research Problems’, in Current Issues and Research in Advertising, James H. Leigh and Claude R. Martin, editors (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuteville, John R.: 1970, ‘Psychic Defenses against High Fear Appeals: A Key Marketing Variable’, Journal of Marketing 34, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David and Lee Anna Clark: 1984, ‘Negative Affectivity: The Disposition to Experience Aversive Emotional States’, Psychological Bulletin 96, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, David M. and Richard A. Westwood: 1986, ‘Measuring Emotional Response’, Journal of Advertising Research 26, 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Public Administration, University of Houston at Clear Lake, 77058-1098, Houston, Texas, USA

    Michael R. Hyman & Richard Tansey

Authors
  1. Michael R. Hyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Tansey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

No professional, be he doctor, lawyer, or manager, can promise that he will indeed do good for his client. All he can do is try. But he can promise that he will not knowingly do harm.... Peter F. Drucker, Management ... [C]oncern for consumer welfare includes an obligation to critically evaluate all marketing techniques that have indeterminant psychological effects. Spence and Moinpour, 1972, p. 43

Dr. Michael R. Hyman is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at the University of Houston — Clear Lake. He is a member of the American Marketing Association, Institute for Management Science, Academy of Marketing Science, Southern Marketing Association, and World Future Society. His work has appeared in the Journal of Marketing, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Retailing, Business Horizons, and several AMA national proceedings. His current research interests include foundations research and philosophical analyses in marketing.

Dr. Richard Tansey is an Instructor of Marketing at the University of Wisconsin — Green Bay. He has his Ph.D. in history from the University of Texas, at Austin, Texas. He received his B.A. in philosophy from the University of West Florida. He minored in philosophy of history and psycho-history while earning his Ph.D. He received a Woodrow Wilson graduate fellowship in philosophy in 1971–1972. His work has appeared in Business Horizons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyman, M.R., Tansey, R. The ethics of psychoactive ads. J Bus Ethics 9, 105–114 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382660

Keywords

Search

Navigation