Skip to main content
Log in

The simple view of reading

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple view of reading was outlined that consisted of two components, decoding and linguistic comprehension, both held to be necessary for skilled reading. Three predictions drawn from the simple view were assessed in a longitudinal sample of English-Spanish bilingual children in first through fourth grade. The results supported each prediction: (a) The linear combination of decoding and listening comprehension made substantial contributions toward explaining variation in reading comprehension, but the estimates were significantly improved by inclusion of the product of the two components; (b) the correlations between decoding and listening comprehension tended to become negative as samples were successively restricted to less skilled readers; and (c) the pattern of linear relationships between listening and reading comprehension for increasing levels of decoding skill revealed constant intercept values of zero and positive slope values increasing in magnitude. These results support the view that skill in reading can be simply characterized as the product of skill in decoding and linguistic comprehension. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the simple view for the practice of reading instruction, the definition of reading disability, and the notion of literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J. and Wilkinson, I. 1985. Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee, A., Langer, J., and Mullis, I. 1987. Learning to be literate in America. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. 1984. Beginning reading instruction: From debate to reformation. In P. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 545–581). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. and Dykstra, R. 1967. The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 2, 5–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. 1954. Auding as the primary language ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Calfee, R. and Associates. 1978. Stanford foundation skills test. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. and Associates. 1980. Stanford foundation skills test (rev. ed.) Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. and Calfee, K. 1979. Interactive reading assessment system. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. and Calfee, K. 1981. Interactive reading assessment system (rev. ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. and Drum, P. 1986. Research on teaching reading. In M. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 804–849). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. 1967. Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. 1980. Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danks, J. 1980. Comprehension in listening and reading: Same or different? In F. Murray (ed.), Reading and understanding (pp. 1–39). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehring, D., Trites, R., Patel, P., and Fiedorowicz, C. 1981. Reading disabilities: The interaction of reading, language, and neuropsychological deficits. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, R. 1981. Why Johnny still can't read. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. and Calfee, R. 1984. Understanding and comprehending. Written Communication, 1, 459–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, C. 1963. Linguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, A. 1949. Character and purposes of the yearbook. In N. Henry (ed.), The forty-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part II. Reading in the elementary school (pp. 1–9). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. 1979. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. 1983. Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 203–211). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. 1984. Word recognition. In P. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. and Hillinger, M. 1980. Learning to read: an unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. and Tunmer, W. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J., Martuza, V., and Seifert, M. 1979. Impacts of instructional time in reading. In L. Resnick and P. Weaver (eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 3, pp. 153–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, D. 1987. Illiteracy: A national dilemma. New York: Cambridge Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, J. 1982. The enigma of hyperlexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. 1982. Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W., Calfee, R., and Mace-Matluck, B. 1984a. Teaching reading to bilingual children study: Vol. 5. Reading growth (Final Report, Contract No. 400-83-0007). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W., Calfee, R., and Mace-Matluck, B. 1984b. Teaching reading to bilingual children study: Vol. 6. Instruction (Final Report, Contract No. 400-83-0007). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, E. 1968. The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. and McClelland, J. 1979. Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. and Baumann, J. 1984. Word identification. In P. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 583–608). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. and Share, D. 1983. Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. 1977. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., MacLeod, C., Hunt, E. and Davidson, J. 1985. Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P., Hansen, J., and Gordon, C. 1979. The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. and Curtis, M. 1986. Reading. In R. Dillon and R. Sternberg (eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 13–57). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. 1980. A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 411–438). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 573–603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. and Porpodas, C. 1980. Lexical and non-lexical processing of spelling in dyslexia. In U. Frith (ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 443–473). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. and Crouse, J. 1981. The relationship of context-use skills to reading: A case for an alternative experimental logic. Child Development, 52, 1326–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. 1980. The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. 1980. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K., Cunningham, A., and Feeman, D. 1984. Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K., Nathan, R., and Vala-Rossi, M. 1986. Developmental changes in the cognitive correlates of reading ability and the developmental lag hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. and West, R. 1983. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T. and James, J. 1984. Listening and reading. In P. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 293–317). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. 1979. Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R., Kaestle, C., and Sum, A. 1987. The subtle danger: Reflections on the literacy abilities of America's young adults. Priceton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. 1985. The case for explicit decoding instruction. In J. Osborn, P. Wilson, and R. Anderson (eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America (pp. 205–213). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoover, W.A., Gough, P.B. The simple view of reading. Read Writ 2, 127–160 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799

Key words

Navigation