Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Target prices, market prices, and economic efficiency in agriculture in the United States

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper looks at one aspect of current United States agricultural policy. This concerns the attempt by the federal government to support commodity prices and income of farmers. This is accomplished through the deficiency payments program. Unfortunately, the program is inherently economically inefficient. Moreover, alternatives (short of eliminating the program altogether and not replacing it) also are not economically efficient.

Zusammenfassung

In der amerikanischen Agrarpolitik spielen Preis- und Einkommenssubventionen für Farmer eine wichtige Rolle. Der Beitrag behandelt die Wirkungen des seit 1985 bestehenden Systems von Ausgleichszahlungen für landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse. Diese Zahlungen errechnen sich als Differenz zwischen dem Subventionspreis für ein bestimmtes landwirtschaftliches Erzeugnis und seinem Marktpreis.

Die bei den Landwirten eintretenden Wirkungen sind meist positiv, hingegen werden die Konsumenten bei Lebensmitteln mit Preiserhöhungen belastet. Seit die Marktpreise in den USA über den Weltmarktpreisen liegen, sind zusätzliche staatliche Subventionen notwendig, um landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse auf dem Weltmarkt verkaufen zu können. Auch dafür werden die Konsumenten in ihrer Rolle als Steuerzahler belastet. Die Kosten des Systems betragen für jeden Steuerzahler jährlich etwa 413$.

Die Ausgleichszahlungen führen zu Verzerrungen bei wirtschaftlichen Anreizen und dadurch zu einer Fehlallokation von Ressourcen. Deshalb wird diese Politik vom Autor als ineffizient beurteilt. Er diskutiert Alternativen, die darauf abzielen, die gewünschten politischen Ziele zu erreichen. Doch keine dieser Alternativen geht ernsthaft das Problem der wirtschaftlichen Ineffizienz an, das mit Subventionen verbunden ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Council of Economic Advisors (1988). Economic Report of the President 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks, M., Llacuna, F., & Linsenbigler, M. (1988). The Conservation Reserve Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, G., & Miller, J. (1974). Economic regulation of domestic air transport. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. (1981). Consequences of farm policies in the 1970s. In: D. G. Johnson (Ed.), Food and agricultural policy for the 1980s, pp. 48–72. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. (1987). Causes of U.S. farm commodity programs. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 290–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, L. K. (1986). Provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (1981). Agriculture policy alternatives for the 1980s. In: D. G. Johnson (Ed.), Food and agricultural policy for the 1980s, pp. 183–209. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G., Hemmi, K., & Lardinois, P. (1985). Agricultural policy and trade. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konandreas, P., & Schmitz, A. (1978). Welfare implications of grain price stabilization. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60, 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, J., Reichelderfer, K., & Sharples, J. (1987). The policy web affecting agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. AIB-524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, J., Reinsel, R., Craven, J., Zellner, J., & Nelson, F. (1985). In: Agricultural-Food Policy Review, pp. 122–165. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasley, P. (1987). Iowa Farm and Rural Life Poll: 1987 summary. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Cooperative Extension.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, K. (1987). Challenges in designing U.S. farm policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. AIB-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlett, R., Matsumoto, M., & Smallwood, D. (1987). How the Food Security Act of 1985 affects consumers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. AIB-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, W. T. (1985). Historical overview of U.S. agricultural policies and programs. In: Agricultural-Food Policy Review, pp. 3–8. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel, R., Craven, J., & Allen, J. (1987). Redistributing farm program benefits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. AIB-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnittker, J. A. (1981). A framework for food and agricultural policy for the 1980s. In: D. G. Johnson (Ed.), Food and agricultural policy for the 1980s, pp. 210–218. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, L. (1987). Parity price. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. AIB-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten, L. (1977). Agricultural policy: A review of legislation, programs, and policy. In: Food and agricultural policy, pp. 29–58. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1986). Agricultural resources: Agricultural land values and markets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1987). Government intervention on agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1988a). Investigations of changes in farm programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1988b). 1988 Agricultural Chartbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1988c). Agricultural Outlook, AO-141. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N. D. (forthcoming, a). Delineating the nature and extent of the market for agricultural commodities. International Trade Journal.

  • Uri, N. D. (1989). A re-examination of the title insurance industry. Real Estate Law Journal, 17, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Noel D. Uri is a Supervisor Agricultural Economist in the Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1301 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005, USA. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the policies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the views of other U.S. Department of Agriculture staff members.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uri, N.D. Target prices, market prices, and economic efficiency in agriculture in the United States. J Consum Policy 12, 1–17 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411386

Keywords

Navigation