Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested theoretically that consumer attitudes have distinct hedonic and utilitarian components, and that product categories differ in the extent to which their overall attitudes are derived from these two components. This paper reports three studies that validate measurement scales for these constructs and, using them, show that these two attitude dimensions do seem to exist; are based on different types of product attributes; and are differentially salient across different consumer products and behaviors, in theoretically-consistent ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. (1980). Causal Models in Marketing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., and D. G. Bonett. (1980). “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,” Psychological Bulletin 24, 163–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., and Larker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. and E. C. Hirschman. (1982). “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research 9, 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, Karl G., and Dag, Sorbom. (1985). LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Equations by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables and Least Squares Methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., and A. R. Bass. (1967). “Attitude Differentiation and Evaluative Scales of the Semantic Differential,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6, 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Joseph. (1965). “Three-Mode Factor Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin 64 (6), 442–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M. G., and Tesser, A. (1986). “Effects of Affective and Cognitive Focus on the Attitude-Behavior Relationship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, James H., and Allan, D. Shocker. (1981). “The Nature of Product-Related Attributes,” in J. N. Sheth (ed.), Research in Marketing, Vol. V. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. (1982). “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,” Journal of Consumer Research 9(3): 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Richard. (1986). “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,” Journal of Advertising Research 26 (1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batra, R., Ahtola, O.T. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters 2, 159–170 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035

Key words

Navigation