Abstract
A computational model for nonpremixed turbulent flames is presented. It is based on the conserved scalar approach and on a convenient specification of the probability density function, which allows the mean density to be recovered in closed (algebraic) form. The k-ε1 model is adopted for turbulence, and the resulting equations for parabolic flows are solved via a block implicit algorithm. The computed results are compared with experimental data and other authors' predictions.
Sommario
Si propone un modello per fiamme turbolente nonpremiscelate. Esso si basa sull'approccio dello scalare conservato e su una conveniente specificazione della funzione densità di probabilità, che permette di ottenere la densità media in forma chiusa (algebrica). Per la turbolenza si adotta il modello k-ε1, ed il sistema di equazioni risultante per flussi parabolici è risolto attraverso un algoritmo implicito a blocchi. I risultati calcolati sono confrontati con dati sperimentali e previsioni di altri autori.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BilgerR. W., ‘Turbulent flows with nonpremixed reactants’. In Turbulent Reacting Flows (eds P. A.Libby and F. A.Williams), Topics in Applied Physics, 44, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.
RhodesR. P., HarshaP. T. and PetersC. E., ‘Turbulent kinetic energy analyses of hydrogen-air diffusion flames’, Acta Astronautica, 1 (1974) 443.
Kent, J. H. and Bilger, R. W., ‘The prediction of turbulent diffusion flame fields and nitric oxide formation’, 16th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, 1977, p. 1643.
JonesW. P., ‘Models for turbulent flows with variable density and combustion’. In Prediction Models for Turbulent Flows (ed. W.Kollman). Hemisphere Publ. Co., Washington, 1980.
Jones, W. P., Private communication, 1989.
LibbyP. A. and WilliamsF. A., ‘Fundamental aspects’. In Turbulent Reacting Flows (eds P. A.Libby and F. A.Williams), Topics in Applied Physics, 44, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.
JonesW. P. and WhitelawJ. H., ‘Calculation methods for turbulent reacting flows: a review’, Comb. Flame, 48 (1982) 1.
Kent, J. H. and Bilger, R. W., ‘Turbulent diffusion flames’, 14th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, 1973, p. 615.
Libby, P. A., Private communication, 1988.
AbramowitzM. and StegunI. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, 1964.
RodiW., Turbulence Models and their Application to Hydraulics—A State of the Art Review, Int. Ass. Hydraulic Research, Delft, 1980.
PatelV. C., RodiW. and ScheurerG., ‘Turbulence model for nearwall and low Reynolds number flows: a review’, AIAA J., 23 (1985) 1308.
Beck, R. E., ‘Experiments on turbulent diffusion flames’, M.Eng.Sc. Thesis, University of Sydney, 1974.
Libby, P. A., ‘An introduction to turbulence’, Lecture Notes, University of California San Diego, 1987.
Reynolds, W. C., ‘The element-potential method for chemical equilibrium analysis: implementation in the interactive program STANJAN’, Dept. Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ., Jan. 1986.
LiewS. K., BrayK. N. C. and MossJ. B., ‘A stretched laminar flamelet model of turbulent nonpremixed combustion’, Comb. Flame, 56 (1984) 199.
Peters, N., ‘Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion’, 21 st Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1986, p. 1231.
Lentini, D., ‘A computational model for nonpremixed turbulent combustion via the stretched laminar flamelet approach’, 46th ATI National Congress, Gaeta, Sept. 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lentini, D. Modelling and simulation of nonpremixed turbulent flames. Meccanica 27, 55–61 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453003
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00453003