Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of potential energy maps and molecular shape invariance maps for two-dimensional conformational problems

  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is well known that many molecular properties are strongly dependent on internal nuclear arrangements. Two possible, independent approaches can be followed while studying changes in molecular characteristics as functions of the nuclear geometry. These are the analysis of potential energy surfaces and the analysis of molecular shape. In this work, we seek to establish relationships between potential energy maps and shape invariance region maps, where each point of these maps represents a nuclear configuration. The study is performed by analyzing the occurrence and lack of certain symmetries in both types of maps. As illustrative examples, we consider the three structural isomers of the dihydroxybenzene molecule. Potential energy is computed at the STO-3G ab initio level, while the shape is described by the shape group method as applied to fused-sphere van der Waals surfaces. It is shown that the symmetry of the shape invariance maps follows closely, but not exactly, the symmetry of potential energy surfaces. The molecular surface is thus “blind” to some small changes of the potential (a feature to be expected to hold also for molecular surfaces defined in terms of electronic charge density). Our findings suggest that a crude fused-sphere model may suffice to describe some of the structural changes in molecular surfaces, as well as their relationships to the electronic energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pullman B (1976) Quantum mechanics of molecular conformations. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mezey PG (1987) Potential energy hypersurfaces. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sanathanan L, Danaher E, Kim K-H, Martin YC (1987) J Comput Chem 8:1075

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richards WG (1983) Quantum Pharmacology. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kier LB, Hall LH (1986) Molecular connectivity in structure-activity analysis. Research Studies Press, Letchworth, UK

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franke R (1984) Theoretical drug design. Pharmacochemistry library, vol 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randic M (1988) Int J Quantum Chem QBS 15:201; Randic M personal communication, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mezey PG (1986) Int J Quantum Chem QBS 12:113

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mezey PG (1987) J Comput Chem 8:462

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arteca GA, Mezey PG (1988) J Comput Chem 9:554

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arteca GA, Mezey PG (1987) Int J Quantum Chem QBS 14:133

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arteca GA, Mezey PG (1988) Int J Quantum Chem QBS 15:33

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arteca GA, Mezey PG (1989) J Phys Chem 93:4746

    Google Scholar 

  14. Francl MM, Hout RF, Hehre WJ (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:563

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frisch MJ, Binkley JS, Schlegel HB, Raghavachari K, Melius CF, Martin RL, Stewart JJP, Bobrowicz FW, Rohlfing CM, Kahn LR, Defrees DJ, Seeger R, Whiteside RA, Fox, DJ, Fleuder EM, Pople JA (1984) Gaussian 86, Carnegie-Mellon Quantum Chemistry Publishing Unit, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vázquez, Ríos MA (1988) Mol Phys 65:129

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arteca GA, Mezey PG, Int J Quantum Chem, in press

  18. Gavezzotti A (1983) J Am Chem Soc 105:5220

    Google Scholar 

  19. Munkres JR (1984) Elements of algebraic topology. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mezey PG (1988) J Math Chem 2:299.

    Google Scholar 

  21. These features were overlooked in [12], where the points were wrongly classified as minima

    Google Scholar 

  22. Woolley RG (1976) Adv Phys 25:27

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mezey PG, Maruani J (1989) Mol Phys, in press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arteca, G.A., Heal, G.A. & Mezey, P.G. Comparison of potential energy maps and molecular shape invariance maps for two-dimensional conformational problems. Theoret. Chim. Acta 76, 377–390 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00528878

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00528878

Key words

Navigation