Abstract
The partial contact of two rough fatigue crack surfaces leads to transmission, reflection, diffraction, and mode conversion of an acoustic signal at those contacts. This paper reviews recent experimental and theoretical efforts to understand and quantify such contact on actual fatigue cracks in greater detail. It is shown that the size and density of individual contacts, or asperities, can be estimated from acoustic measurements. Furthermore, it is shown that this information is useful to provide the static stress across a partially closed crack as well as the “effective” stress intensity range which activates fatigue crack propagation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. G. Silk,Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, Vol. III. R. S. Sharpe, ed. (Academic Press, London and New York, 1977), p. 51.
O. Buck and B. R. Tittmann,Advances in Crack Length Measurement C. J. Beevers, ed. (Engineering Materials Advisory Services (EMAS), Cradley Health, Warley, West Midlands U. K., 1982), p. 413.
W. Elber,Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures (ASTM STP 486, 1971), p. 230.
C. Q. Bowles and J. Schijve,Fatigue Mechanisms: Advances in Quantitative Measurement of Physical Damage (ASTM STP 811, 1983), p. 400.
O. Buck, J. D. Frandsen, and H. L. Marcus,Fatigue Crack Growth Under Spectrum Loads (ASTM STP 595, 1976), p. 101.
S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie, Some considerations on the modelling of oxide-induced fatigue crack closure using solutions for a rigid wedge inside a linear elastic crack,Scripta Met. 17: 575, (1983).
S. Golan, L. Adler, K. V. Cook, R. K. Nanstad, and T. K. Bolland, Ultrasonic diffraction technique for characterization of fatigue cracks,J. Nondestructive Evaluation 1: 11 (1980).
N. F. Haines, The theory of sound transmission and reflection at contacting surfaces, Report RD/B/N4711, Central Electricity Generating Board, Research Division, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, England, 1980.
A. B. Wooldridge, The effects of compressive stress and contaminating liquids on the ultrasonic detection of fatigue cracks,Revue du CETHEDEC 17-4,NS 80 (2):233, (1980).
R. B. Thompson, B. J. Skillings, L. W. Zachary, L. W. Schmerr, and O. Buck,Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 2A D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), p. 325.
S. Golan and R. Arone,New Procedures in Nondestructive Testing P. Höller, ed. (Berlin-Heidelberg, New York 1983), p. 587.
R. B. Thompson, C. J. Fiedler, and O. Buck, inNondestructive Methods for Materials Property Determination C. O. Ruud and R. E. Green, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984), p. 161.
R. B. Thompson and C. J. Fiedler,Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 3A D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984), p. 207.
O. Buck and R. B. Thompson,Fatigue 84 C. J. Beevers, ed. (Engineering Materials Advisory Services (EMAS), Cradley Heath, Warley, West Midlands, U. K., 1984), p. 667.
D. K. Rehbein, R. B. Thompson, and O. Buck, Interaction of ultrasonic waves with simulated and real fatigue cracks, inReview of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 4 D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).
H. M. Westergaard, Bearing pressures and cracks,Trans. ASME (J. Appl. Mech.)61: A-49, (1939).
O. Buck, B. J. Skillings, and L. K. Reed,Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 2A D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), p. 345.
J. R. Rice,Fatigue Crack Propagation (ASTM STP 415, 1967), p. 247.
C. J. Beevers, K. Bell, R. L. Carlson, and E. A. Starke, A model for fatigue crack closure,Eng. Fract. Mechanics 19: 93, (1984).
S. Suresh, D. M. Parks, and R. O. Ritchie,Fatigue Thresholds; Fundamentals and Engineering Applications, J. Bäcklund, A. F. Blom, and C. J. Beevers, eds. (Engineering Materials Advisory Services (EMAS), Cradley Health, Warley, West Midlands, U. K., 1981), p. 391.
B. R. Tittmann, L. A. Ahlberg, and O. Buck,Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 1 D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1982), p. 551.
O. Buck, C. J. Fiedler, L. K. Reed, K. M. Lakin, and R. B. Thompson,Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 3A D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984), p. 199.
A. B. Wooldridge, The effects of compressive stress on the ultrasonic response of steel-steel interfaces and of fatigue cracks, Report NW/SSD/RR/42/79, Central Electricity Generating Board, Northwestern Region, Manchester, England, 1979.
J-M. Baik and R. B. Thompson, The elastic compliance of imperfect interfaces: review and relationship to ultrasonic scattering, inReview of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 4 D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).
Y. C. Angel and J. D. Achenbach, Reflection and transmission of elastic waves by an array of microcracks, inReview of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 4 D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).
R. B. Thompson, C. J. Fielder, and D. K. Rehbein, (manuscript in preparation).
M. T. Resch, B. D. London, H. H. Yuce, and D. V. Nelson, Use of nondestructive evaluation techniques in studies of small fatigue cracks, presented atInternational Symposium on Fundamental Questions and Critical Experiments on Fatigue (ASTM, Dallas, Texas, October 1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buck, O., Thompson, R.B. & Rehbein, D.K. The interaction of ultrasound with contacting asperities: Applications to crack closure and fatigue crack growth. J Nondestruct Eval 4, 203–212 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566225
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566225