We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical shifts of aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions: Influence of the polar and nonpolar groups on the water proton shifts at 0°C

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydroxyl-proton chemical shifts of alcohol mixtures and aqueous solutions containing some nonelectrolytes (alcohols, ketones, cyclic ethers, and amines) have been measured at 60 MHz and at 0°C. Methyl-proton resonance of the solutes was used as the internal reference and the water-proton shifts in solutions were measured with respect to pure water. Downfield shifts for some alcohols (particularly tertiary butanol and iso-propanol), cyclic ethers, and amines in the water-rich region were confirmed For alcohols and some other nonelectrolytes in water, the observed shifts were decomposed to component contributions arising from the “polar group” effect, “solute proton” effect, and “nonpolar group” effect. Polar effects are found to contribute a substantial fraction of the observed downfield shifts. After subtracting these polar contributions, however, there still remains certain amounts of downfield shifts which may be attributed to the effect of nonpolar groups on the water structure. The downfield shifts are found to be relatively large when the solutes have branched alkyl groups with nearly spherical shape and with diameters of about 5 Å. Strikingly large downfield shifts of water proton resonance were found for some secondary amines and tertiary diamines with globular shape. However, in view of the extrapolation technique employed in evaluating the “polar group” effect, the downfield “nonpolar group” effect we estimated should be considered as the upper limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Weinberg and J. R. Zimmerman,J. Chem. Phys. 23, 748 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Pople, W. G. Schneider, and H. J. Bernstein,High-Resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. G. Hertz and W. Spalthoff,Z. Elektrochem. 63, 1096 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. G. Hertz and M. D. Zeidler,Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 68, 821 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Clifford and B. A. Pethica,Trans. Faraday Soc. 61, 182 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Clifford, B. A. Pethica, and W. A. Senior,Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 125, 458 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Fister and H. G. Hertz,Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. chem. 71, 1032 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. G. Hertz, inProgress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, J. W. Emsley, J. Feeney, and L. H. Sutcliffe, eds. (Pergamon Press, London 1967), Vol. 3, pp. 159–230.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Laszlo in the same book of,ref. 8, , pp. 231–402.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. D. Eley and M. J. Hey,Trans. Faraday Soc. 64, 1990 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. N. Glew, H. D. Mak, and N. S. Rath,Can. J. Chem. 46, 195 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. N. Glew, H. D. Mak, and N. S. Rath, inHydrogen-Bonded Solvent Systems, A. K. Covington and P. Jones, eds. (Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 1968), pp. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Reuben,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 5725 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. G. Hertz, B. Lindman, and V. Siepe,Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 73, 542 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. v. Goldamer and H. G. Hertz,J. Phys. Chem. 74, 3734 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. T. Arnold and M. E. Packard,J. Chem. Phys. 19, 1608 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. G. Anderson and M. C. R. Symons,Trans. Faraday Soc. 65, 2550 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Y. Wen, P. T. Inglefield, Y. Lin, and G. Minott, Clark University, unpublished results, 1971.

  19. E. R. Malinowski and A. R. Pierpaoli,J. Mag. Res. 1, 509 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. N. Glew, H. D. Mak, and N. S. Rath,Chem. Commun. 1968, 264 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Oakes, Unilever Research Laboratory, Port Sunlight, England, private communications. 1970.

  22. E. Forslind and A. Johansson, University of Stockholm, Sweden, private communications, 1962.

  23. A. D. Buckingham,Can. J. Chem. 38, 300 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Laszlo and J. I. Musher,J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3906 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Diehl and R. Freeman,Mol. Phys. 4, 39 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. T. Raynes, A. D. Buckingham, and H. J. Bernstein,J. Chem. Phys. 36, 3481 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work done at Professor Hertz's laboratory in Karlsruhe on a sabbatical leave from Clark University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, WY., Hertz, H.G. Chemical shifts of aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions: Influence of the polar and nonpolar groups on the water proton shifts at 0°C. J Solution Chem 1, 17–37 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00648414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00648414

Key Words

Navigation