Abstract
Due to a numerical error, the computed noise energy of a dc SQUID, neglecting capacitance, as given by Tesche and Clarke is too small by a factor of about two.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. D. Tesche and J. Clarke,J. Low Temp. Phys. 29, 301 (1977).
R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, A. N. Boers, S. I. Raider, C. M. Knoedler, and J. M. Viggiano,IEEE Trans. Mag. MAG-17, 395 (1981).
R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, M. B. Ketchen, and A. N. Broers, inProc. of the Second International Conference on Superconducting Quantum Devices (Berlin, 1981), p. 365.
R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, S. I. Raider, and J. Clarke,J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2306 (1980).
M. B. Ketchen and R. F. Voss,Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 812 (1979).
R. H. Koch, D. J. van Harlingen, and J. Clarke,Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2132 (1980).
R. H. Koch, D. J. van Harlingen, and J. Clarke,Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 380 (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support provided by FOM.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruines, J.J.P., de Waal, V.J. & Mooij, J.E. Comment on: “Dc SQUID: Noise and optimization” by Tesche and Clarke. J Low Temp Phys 46, 383–386 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00655060
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00655060