Skip to main content
Log in

Formal structures, the concepts of covariance, invariance, equivalent reference frames, and the principle Relativity

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

In this paper a given spacetime theoryT is characterized as the theory of a certainspecies of structure in the sense of Bourbaki [1]. It is then possible to clarify in a rigorous way the concepts ofpassive andactive covariance ofT under the action of the manifold mapping groupG M . For eachT, we define also aninvariance groupG I T and, in general,G I TG M . This group is defined once we realize that, for eachτModT, each explicit geometrical object defining the structure can be classified as absolute or dynamical [2]. All spacetime theories possess alsoimplicit geometrical objects that do not appear explicitly in the structure. These implicit objects are not absolute nor dynamical. Among them there are thereference frame fields, i.e., “timelike” vector fieldsXTU,\(U \subseteq M\) M, whereM is a manifold which is part ofST, a substructure for eachτModT, called spacetime. We give a physically motivated definition of equivalent reference frames and introduce the concept of theequivalence group of a class of reference frames of kind X according to T, G X T. We define thatT admits aweak principle of relativity (WPR) only ifG X T ≠ identity for someX. IfG X T =G I T for someX, we say thatT admits a strong principle of relativity (PR).

The results of this paper generalize and clarify several results obtained by Anderson [2], Scheibe [3], Hiskes [4], Recami and Rodrigues [5], Friedman [6], Fock [7], and Scanavini [8]. Among the novelties here, there is the realization that the definitions ofG I T andG X T can be given only when certain boundary conditions for the equations of motion ofT can be physically realizable in the domainU \(U \subseteq M\) M, where a given reference frame is defined. The existence ofphysically realizable boundary conditions for eachτModT (in ∂U), in contrast with the mathematically possible boundary condition, is then seen to be essential for the validity of a principle of relativity forT.

The methodology of the present paper has been applied to several topics of spacetime physics with very interesting results. Here we mention:

  1. (i)

    The Newtonian concepts of absolute space and absolute time can be presented in a very elegant way as “species of structure”. One of the surprising results is that we succeeded in finding a Lorentzian structure [9] in Newtonian spacetime without introducing any new explict geometrical object in the original structure. The Newtonian spacetime structure and its relation to the relativistic spacetime structure and to the structure of the spacetime of the so-called Lorentz aether theories [11,12] is fully discussed in [13].

  2. (ii)

    It is possible to present in a novel and unified way the question concerning experiments designed to detect a possible breakdown of Lorentz invariance, a subject we already dedicated attention to in Rodrigues and Tiomno [11,12] and Rodrigues [14,15]. A full account of this subject will be published elsewhere.

  3. (iii)

    In Rodrigues and Scanavini [16], we proved that there are models of General Relativity that contain a canonical privileged locally inertial reference frame that can be physically distinguished from any other frame by experiments doneinside the frame.

Although the formalism of this paper may at first sight look very abstract, actually it is easy to aplly it to specific theories. We present an example at the end of the paper which is sufficiently general to show “in action” almost all concepts introduced in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourbaki, N., 1957,Theorie des Ensembles, Chap. 4, Herman, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J. L., 1967,Principles of Relativity Physics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scheibe, E., 1978, in Niinilvolto and Tuomela E. (eds.), “The logic and epistemology of scientific change”,Acta Phil. Fenn. XXX, 205 - 332.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hiskes, A. L. D., 1984,Found. Phys. 14, 307 - 332.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Recami, E., and Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., 1982,Found. of Physics. 12, 709 - 718.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, M., 1983,Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fock, V., 1958,Space, Time and Gravitation, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scanavini, M. E. F., 1986, Ph.D thesis IMECC-UNICAMP.

  9. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., and Faria-Rosa, M. A., 1989,Found. Phys. 19, 705–724.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodrigues, W.A. Jr. and Oliveira, E.C.,Phys. Lett. A14, 474–484 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., and Tiomno, J., 1984,Rev. Bras. Fisica 14 (Suppl.), 450 - 565.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., and Tiomno, J., 1985,Found. Phys. 15, 955 -961.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., and Q.A.G. de Souza, “The structures of Newtonian, Lorentz aether and relativistic spacetimes RT/IMECC-UNICAMP, to be published.

  14. Rodrigues, W. A. Jr., 1983,Nuovo Cimento B74, 199 - 211.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., 1984,Hadronic Journal 7, 436 -455.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues, W. A., Jr., and Scanavini, M. E. F., 1989, Privileged reference frames in general relativity, R.T. 07/89, IMECC-UNICAMP, subm.Found. Phys. Lett.

  17. Reinchenbach, H., 1958,The Philosophy of Space and Time, Dover, New York.

  18. Trautman, A., 1984,Differential Geometry for Physicists, Bibliopolis, Napoli.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop, R. L., and Goldberg, S. I., 1980,Tensor Analysis on Manifolds, Dover, New York.

  20. Veblen O. and J.H.C. Whitehead, 1932,Foundations of Differential Geometry, Cambridge Univ. Press.

  21. Einstein, A., “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies”, in A. Sommerfeld, (Leipzig),The Principle of Relativity, Dover (1952);Ann. der Physik. 17 (1905).

  22. Faria-Rosa, M.A., E. Recami, and W. A. Rodrigues, Jr., 1986,Phys. Lett. B173, 233–236; 1987,B188, 511E.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodrigues, W.A., Jr., E. Recami, A. Maia, Jr., and M. A. Faria-Rosa, 1989,Phys. Lett. B220, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Marinov, S., 1974,Czech. J. Phys. B24, 965 (1980); Gen. Rel. Grav.12, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sherwin, C.W., 1987,Phys. Rev. A35, 365; 1989 in M.C. Duffy (ed.),Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory, vol. II, pp. 59-61, British Soc. Phil. Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cavalleri, G., 1989, in M.C. Duffy (ed.),Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory, Vol. II, pp. 1–23, Britsh Soc. Phil. Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cavalleri G. and G. Spavieri, 1989,Il Nuovo Cimento A101, 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, W.A., Scanavini, M.E.F. & de Alcantara, L.P. Formal structures, the concepts of covariance, invariance, equivalent reference frames, and the principle Relativity. Found Phys Lett 3, 59–79 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666085

Key words

Navigation