Abstract
This article introduces a conceptual model of housing quality that emphasizes consumers' experience of improvements during their lifetime. Following a review of the widely recognized inadequacies associated with the traditional indicators of housing quality, a ‘housing progress’ model is offered as an alternative method for conceptualizing the quality of persons' housing experiences. This model suggests that changes in the level of housing well-being are reflected by changes in the rate at which households move toward their personal housing preferences. To operationalize this concept, four indicators are developed that are based on the pattern of housing unit exchanges achieved by movers each year between 1973 and 1977. The indicators reveal a pronounced downtum in progress (on the order of 20 percent) with the fall in construction between 1973 and 1975. After 1975, progress increased with the rise in construction, but there is evidence of a widening gap between the housing opportunities of owners and renters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Baer, William C.: 1976, ‘The evolution of housing indicators and housing standards’, Public Policy 24, pp. 361–93.
Birch, David et al.: 1973, America's Housing Needs: 1970 to 1980. (MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Bishop, Yvonne M. M., Fienberg, Stephen E. and Holland, Paul W.: 1975, Discrete Multivariate Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Budding, David W.: 1978, Draft Report on Housing Deprivation Among Enrollees in the Housing Allowance Demand Experiment (Abt Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Campbell, Angus Converse, Philip E. and Rodgers, Willard L.: 1976, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).
Davis, James A.: 1974, ‘Hierarchical models for significance tests in multivariate contingency tables’, in Herbert L.Costuer (ed.), Sociological Methodology. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp. 189–231.
Daymont, Thomas N. and Kaufman, Robert L.: 1979, ‘Measuring industrial variation in racial discrimination using log linear models’, Social Science Research 8, pp. 41–67.
Follain, James; Katz, Jane and Struyk, Raymond J.: 1978, ‘Programmatic options to encourage homeownership’, Occasional Papers in Housing and Community Affairs 2, pp. 1–133. Issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Frieden, Bernard J.; Solomon, Arthur P.; Birch, David L.; and Pitkin, John.: 1977, The Nation's Housing: 1975 to 1985 (MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies: Cambridge, Massachusetts.)
Federal Home Loan Bank Board: 1979, Federal Home Loan Bank Board Journal. (Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Washington, D.C.).
Goedert, Jeanne E. and Goodman, John L.Jr.: 1977, Indicators of the Quallity of U.S. Housing (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).
Golant, Stephen M.: 1977, ‘The housing tenure adjustments of the young and the elderly’, Urban Affairs Quarterly 13, pp. 95–108.
Goodman, John L.Jr.: 1978, ‘Causes and indicators of housing quality’, Social Indicators Research 5, pp. 195–210.
Grossman, Marc; Kriklewicz, Ernest and Chamberlain, Philip: 1976, A Comparative Assessement of Contemporary Procedures to Determine Housing Need. (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia).
Holleb, Doris B.: 1978, ‘A decent home and suitable living environment’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 435, pp. 102–16.
Lansing, John B.; Clifton, Charles W. and Morgan, James N.: 1969, New Homes and Poor People: Study of Chains of Moves. (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
Marcuse, Peter: 1971, ‘Social indicators and housing policy’, Urban Affairs Quarterly 7, pp. 193–217.
Mayer, Neil: 1977, Homeownership: the Changing Relationship of Costs and Incomes, and Possible Federal Roles, (U.S. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C.).
National Association of Realtors: 1978, Existing Home Sales Series, Annual Report (National Association of Realtors, Washington, D.C.).
Page, William F.: 1977, ‘Interpretation of Goodman's log-linear model effects’, Sociological Methods and Research 5, pp. 419–435.
Pitkin, John and Masnick, George S.: 1979, Analysis and Projection of Housing Consumption by Birth Cohorts: 1960–2000, report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (MIT-Harvard Joint Center for Urban Studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Rainwater, Lee: 1974, What Money Buys: Inequality and the Social Meaning of Income. (Basic Books, New York).
Sands, Gary and Bower, Lewis L.: 1976, Housing Turnover and Housing Policy: Case Studies of Vacancy Chains in New York State (Praeger, New York).
Strumpel, Burkhard: 1973, ‘Economic life-styles, values, and subjective welfare—an empirical approach’, in Eleanor B.Sheldon (ed.), Family Economic Behavior. (J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia). pp. 69–125.
Struyk, Raymond J.: 1977, Should Government Encourage Homeownership? (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1962, Metropolitan Housing, Part 1, United States and Divisions, vol. II, 1960 Census of Housing. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1967, Measuring the Quality of Housing: An Appraisal of the Census Statistics and Methods (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1972a, Current Population Reports P-20, no. 235. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1972b, Space Utilization of the Inventory, HC(7)-3, 1970 Census of Housing. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1975a–1979a, Current Housing Reports, H-150-73D through-77D, Part D: Housing Characteristics of Recent Movers. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1975b–1979b, Current Housing Reports, H-150-73A through-77A, Part A: General Housing Characteristics. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1977c, Current Population Reports P-20, no. 305. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1978c, Current Population Report, P-60, No. 118. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1979c, Current Housing Reports, H-150-77C, Part C: Financial Characteristics of the Housing Inventory. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1979d, Current Construction Reports, C27–78 Q4. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Department of Commerce: 1974, Social Indicators, 1973. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Department of Commerce: 1977, Social Indicators, 1976. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: 1971–1978, Housing and Urban Development Trends, volumes 25–32. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: 1979, The 1978 HUD Survey on the Quality of Community Life: A Data Book (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
U.S. President's Committee on Urban Housing: 1967, The Report of the President's Committee on Urban Housing, Technical Studies 1 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).
Weicher, John C.: 1978, ‘New home affordability, equity, and housing market behavior’ Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 6, pp. 395–416.
White, Harrison C.: 1971, ‘Multipliers, vacancy chains, and filtering in housing’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 37, pp. 88–94.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, D. Housing progress in the seventies: New indicators. Soc Indic Res 9, 35–60 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668700
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668700