Synopsis
The bulk of Lake Opinicon fish biomass is concentrated in the physically diverse inshore areas. Quantitative analysis of the community compositions of the various inshore habitat types (weedy inlets, sandy shallows, rock shelf, gravel, etc.) showed that each supported a characteristic assemblage of fishes with a relatively constant species and year class composition. This was maintained throughout the season despite a drop in fish biomass in late summer when there was a progressive movement into the offshore waters.
Weedbed areas supported the highest biomass, and greatest species and year class diversity. Thereafter, in declining order of richness, were rocky and sandy areas. A few fish species were restricted to single habitat types, e.g.Notropis heterodon to inshore weedbeds.Lepomis macrochirus, the commonest species in the lake was, by contrast, versatile and occurred in all inshore habitats. Commonly the numbers of a species in a habitat differed between day and night. Significant diel movements between habitats characterized two nocturnal feedersPomoxis nigromaculatus andIctalurus nebulosus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References cited
Emery, A. R. 1973. Preliminary comparisons of day and night habits in fresh water fish in Ontario lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 761–774.
Hasler, A. D. & J. F. Bardach. 1949. Daily migrations of perch in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. J. Wildl. Mgt. 13: 40–51.
Jobes, F. W. 1952. Age, growth, and production of yellow perch in Lake Erie. Fisheries Bull. 70: 204–26.
Keast, A. 1968a. Feeding of some Great Lakes fishes at low temperature. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1199–1218.
Keast, A. 1968b. Feeding biology of the black crappie,Pomoxis nigromaculatus. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 285–297.
Keast, A. 1970. Food specializations and bioenergetic interrelations in the fish faunas of some small Ontario waterways. pp. 377–411. In: J. H. Steele (ed.), Marine Food Chains. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
Keast, A. 1977. Mechanisms minimizing intraspecific competition in vertebrates, with a quantitative study of the contrasting strategies of two centrarchid fishes,Ambloplites rupestris andLepomis macrochirus. Evolutionary Biology 8 (in print).
Keast, A. & J. Harker. 1977a. Strip counts as a means of determining densities and habitat utilization patterns in lake fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 1: 181–188.
Keast, A. & J. Harker. 1977b. Fish distribution and benthic invertebrate biomass relative to depth in an Ontario lake. Env. Biol. Fish. 2 (in print).
Keast, A. & L. Welsh. 1968. Daily feeding periodicities, food uptake rates, and dietary changes with hour of day in some lake fishes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 25: 1133–1144.
Northcote, T. G. & D. W. Wilkie. 1963. Underwater census of stream fish populations. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 92: 146–151.
Werner, E. E., D. J. Hall, D. R. Laughlin, D. J. Wagner, L. A. Wilsmann & F. C. Funk. 1977. Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 360–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keast, A., Harker, J. & Turnbull, D. Nearshore fish habitat utilization and species associations in Lake Opinicon (Ontario, Canada). Environ Biol Fish 3, 173–184 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691941
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691941