Skip to main content
Log in

Trade-offs in sulfur emission trading in Europe

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How to implement emission trading is one question in the current negotiations on a new sulfur protocol in Europe. Whereas the current protocol stipulates a 30 percent uniform reduction, national emission ceilings included in the proposed new protocol imply differentiated reductions. In addition, emission and fuel standards are proposed. This paper examines the costs and environmental impacts of emission trading. Emission trading combined with regulations is a new element in the paper. Calculations using the RAINS (Regional Acidification INformation and Simulation) model suggest that overlaying emission trading on regulations not only reduces the cost savings but has beneficial impacts as well: ecosystem protection is not changed and significant decreases in environmental benefits for countries are largely avoided. Emission trading can also be used to decrease emissions and increase ecosystem protection. If combined with existing legislation, emission trading minimizes losses in expected environmental benefits for some countries, and most countries gain. However, the initial distribution of emission ceilings has to be used so that some countries are not confronted with higher costs. Trade-offs appear to exist between the use of emission trading to achieve cost savings on the one hand, and ecosystem protection and distributional equity on the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcamo, J., R. Shaw and L. Hordijk (eds.) (1990),The RAInS Model of Acidification. Science and Strategies in Europe. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, M., G. Klaassen and W. Schöpp (1993),Closing the gap between the 1990 deposition and the critical sulfur deposition values. Background paper prepared for the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling, June 7–8, 1993. May 1993. Laxenburg, IIASA.

  • Bennett, G. (ed.) (1991),Air pollution control in the European Community. London/Dordrecht/Boston, Graham and Trotman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, H., O. Jörnsted and K. Löfgren (1993)Five economic instruments in Swedish environmental protection policy. Solna: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borge, E. (1992),Letter of September 1992. Oslo, State Pollution Control Authority (SFT).

    Google Scholar 

  • CITEPA (1986),Data on emission factors and fuel distribution as collected in the frame of an EEC emission inventory, (unpublished) Paris, Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d'Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique.

  • Cofala, J. (1991),Personal communication. Laxenburg, IIASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, R. (1993),Personal communication. The Hague, The Netherlands Ministry for Public Housing Physical Planning and Environmental Protection (VROM), Directorate Air.

  • Federal Committee for the Environment (1991),Regulation, issued by the Federal Committee for the Environment of October 1, 1991 concerning the law 309 of July, 1991 on air pollution control, Prague.

  • Hahn, R. W. and G. L. Hester (1989), Where did all the markets go? An analysis of EPA's Emissions Trading Program,Yale Journal on Regulation 6, 109–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N. (1989), New tools for European air pollution control,International Environmental Affairs. 1(1), Winter 1989, p. 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettelingh, J.-P., R. J. Downing and P. de Smet (1991),Mapping critical loads for Europe, CCE Technical Report No. 1. RIVM Report No. 259101001. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Coordination Center for Effects: National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. and G. Corcelle (1989),The environmental policy of the European communities. London/Dordrecht/Boston, Graham and Trotman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kete, N. (1992), The U.S. Acid Rain Control Allowance Trading System. In:Climate change, designing a tradeable permit system. Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, G., P. Kee, A. Nentjes, W. Hafkamp and A. Olsthoorn (1988),The macroeconomic impacts of the EC large combustion plants Directive proposal. Technical document I: assessment of investments, costs and emission reduction. Luxembourg, Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, A. J., W. E. Oates and E. van de Verg (1983), On marketable air pollution permits: the case for a system of pollution offsets,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10: 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, W. D. (1972), Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs,Journal of Economic Theory 5: 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSZNIL (Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry) (1990), Ordinance of the MOSZNIL of 12th February 1990 on Protection on Air against Pollution,Journal of Laws No. 15, 1990 (In Polish), Warsaw.

  • OJ (1988), Council Directive of November 1988 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants in the air from large combustion plants,Official Journal of the European Communities, L336, Volume 31, 7 December 1988, pp. 1–13.

  • Rentz, O., H. D. Haasis, T. Morgenstern, J. Remmers and G. Schons (1990),Optimal control strategies for reducing emissions form energy conversion and energy use in all countries of the European Community, KfK-PEf72, Karlsruhe: Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandnes, H. and H. Styve (1992),Calculated budgets for airborne acidifying components in Europe, 1985, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991, EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/92. Oslo, Norway: Meteorological Synthesizing Center-West, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (1993), Interview. National Agency for Environmental Protection, Denmark. Geneva: December 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1985),Emission trading: an exercise in reforming pollution policy, Resources for the Future, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1985),Protocol to the 1979 Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution on the reduction of sulfur emissions or their transboundary fluxes by at least 30 percent, Helsinki, 8 July 1985.

  • UN/ECE (1987),National strategies and policies for air pollution abatement, ECE/ EB. Air/14. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE (1991),Strategies and policies for air pollution abatement, 1990 review, ECE/ EB. Air/27. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE (1993a),Report of the eleventh session. Executive Body for the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies, EB.Air/ WG.5/22. Geneva, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (unpublished document).

  • UN/ECE (1993b),Preliminary draft second sulfur protocol. Executive Body for the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies EB/Air/WG.5/R.43, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (unpublished document).

  • Vernon, J. (1988),Emission standards for coal fired plants. London, IEA Coal Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlieg, F. (1993),Personal communication. The Hague, The Netherlands Ministry for Public Housing Physical Planning and Environmental Protection (VROM), Directorate Air.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klaassen, G. Trade-offs in sulfur emission trading in Europe. Environ Resource Econ 5, 191–219 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693023

Key words

Navigation