Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization and destabilization of austenite in Cr−Ni−Co−Mo maraging steel

  • Maraging Steels
  • Published:
Metal Science and Heat Treatment Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    For the Cr−Ni−Co−Mo steels investigated the character of the martensitic transformation changes with decreasing MS (induced by slight changes in chemical composition) — the isothermal transformation is superposed on the athermal transformation.

  2. 2.

    The rate of the isothermal transformation increases with decreasing MS and evidently for this reason the susceptibility of austenite to thermal stabilization increases in the process of cooling and during repeated heating after quenching.

  3. 3.

    For steels with>15% retained austenite after the original quenching the cooling conditions after austenitizing must be strictly controlled (cooling with compressed air, for example), since the amount of retained austenite may be affected by stabilization and destabilization processes and also stresses that occur in the process of cooling during quenching.

  4. 4.

    Steels of the transition class investigated cannot be heated in the temperature range of 200–500° (welding, cutting, et al.) before the cold treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. V. L. Nikol'skaya, L. M. Pevzner, and N. G. Orekhov, “Effect of retained austenite on the properties of cast stainless steels,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 9, 35 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ya. M. Potak, High-Strength Steels [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1972), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. M. Pevzner and T. D. Kubyshkina, Methods of Testing and Investigating Machine Construction Materials (Handbook), Physical Methods of Investigating Materials [in Russian], Vol. 1 (1971), p. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Ya. Georgieva and I. I. Nikitina, “Isothermal and athermal martensitic transformations,” in: Problems of Metal Science and Physics of Metals [in Russian], No. 1 (1972), p. 92.

  5. M. E. Blanter and B. G. Serebrennikova, “The nature of thermal stabilization of austenite,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 7, 5 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. E. Blanter and B. G. Serebrennikova, “The nature of thermal stabilization of austenite,” in: Transactions of the All-Union Correspondence Machine Construction Institute [in Russian], No. 1 (1973). p. 39.

  7. I. Ya. Georgieva and I. I. Nikitina, “Isothermal and athermal martensitic transformations,” Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., No. 15, 68 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. D. Sadovskii et al., “Quenching steel in magnetic field,” Fiz. Met. Metalloved.,24, No. 5, 918 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov, No. 9, pp. 29–32, September, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikol'skaya, V.L., Orekhov, N.G. & Pevzner, L.M. Stabilization and destabilization of austenite in Cr−Ni−Co−Mo maraging steel. Met Sci Heat Treat 21, 692–695 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708632

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708632

Keywords

Navigation