Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between physical disability and narcissism: A critique of the literature

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article critically examines some of the major psychoanalytic writings on the relationship between physical disability and narcissism. Tracing the evolution of thought about narcissism from Freud's original formulation to a self-psychological approach, it considers and contrasts pain, illness, and adult disability on the one hand and early onset disability on the other. The conclusion reached is that disability and narcissism are related in complex ways, depending on a variety of physical, developmental, and environmental factors. Thus, clinicians must avoid making a priori assumptions in work with disabled patients, for such assumptions may be countertransferential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, A. (1933).Social interest: A challenge to mankind. New York: Capricorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, A., & Rousso, H. (1982). Therapists with disabilities: Theoretical and clinical issues. Unpublished paper presented at conference of the same title, New York, New York, October 30, 1982.

  • Castelnuovo-Tedesco P. (1981). Psychological consequences of physical defects: A psychoanalytic perspective.International Review of Psychoanalysis, 8, 145–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cath, S., Glud, E., & Blane, H. (1957). The role of body image in psychotherapy with the physically handicapped.Psychoanalytic Review, 44, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1952). The role of body illness in the mental life of children.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 7, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: An introduction.Standard Edition, Vol. 14.

  • Freud, S. (1916). Some character-types met with in psychoanalytic work.Standard Edition, Vol. 14.

  • Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures.Standard Edition, Vol. 14.

  • Kris Study Group, Beres/Calder Section. (1971). The influence of early childhood illness and defect on analyzability. Unpublished paper presented in 1971 to the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, New York, New York.

  • Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H., & Wolf, E. (1978). Disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, A. (1979). Narcissism and the physical rehabilitation patient.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, A. (1980). The physical handicap and the body ego.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 61, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederland, W. G. (1965). Narcissistic ego impairment in patients with early physical malformations.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 20, 518–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. (1975). Toward a functional definition of narcissism.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rousso, H. The relationship between physical disability and narcissism: A critique of the literature. Clin Soc Work J 13, 5–17 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755374

Keywords

Navigation