Skip to main content
Log in

Social support and social adjustment: Implications for mental health professionals

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general importance of an individual's support network has been recognized in the field of community mental health; yet a more detailed understanding of how a client's available social ties may contribute to his or her adjustment is presently lacking. This study used network analysis to examine differences in the social networks of mental health clients to identify factors associated with positive social adjustment. Subjects were selected from three different types of mental health programs as well as from the general population of Marion County, Oregon. Results generally revealed that subjects from the community sample more often would look to immediate family members for support. Better functioning chronic clients emphasized professional contacts, whereas more poorly adjusted chronic clients would look to friends for support. The results have implications both for understanding the nature of the support available to a client and mobilizing the support resources of the existing network of relationships to aid adjustment to community living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boissevain, J., & Mitchell, J. C. (Eds.).Network analysis: Studies in human interaction. The Hague, Netherlands, Morton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciarlo, J. A., & Reihman, J. The Denver community mental health questionnaire: Development of a multidimensional program evaluation instrument. In R. D. Coursev (Ed.),Program evaluation for mental health: Methods, strategies, and participants. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Pancoast, D.Natural helping systems. Washington, D.C.; National Association of Social Workers, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. D. The concept of personal networks in clinical practice.Family Process, 487–498, 1975.

  • Fischer, C. S.Networks and places. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froland, C.Analyzing social networks: Implications for the health professions. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froland, C.Improving the social adjustment of mental health clients: The case for social support networks. Doctoral dissertation, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeiey, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. H., Cassel, J. C., & Gove, J. Social support and health.Medical Care, 1977,15(5) 47–50 (Supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreissman, D., & Joy, V. Family responses to the mental illness of a relative: A review of the literature.Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1974,10, 34–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, J. B. Social networks, lay consultation and help-seeking behavior.Social Forces, 1973,51, 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, J.Designing the balanced service system: A partial review of the literature. Atlanta, Ga.: Georgia Mental Health Institute, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilisuk, M., & Froland, C. Social networks, kinship, social support and health.Social Science and Medicine. In press.

  • President's commission on Mental Health.Report of the task panel on community support system. (Vol. II, App.) Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reihman, J., Brodsky, G., & Adams, G.Standardization of the Denver community mental health questionnaire in Oregon. Salem, Oreg. Oregon Mental Health Division, Management Support Services, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D.Network related intervention. Paper commissioned by the School Capacity for Problem Solving Group. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, R., & Attneave, G.Family networks. New York: Pantheon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsdorf, C.: Social networks, support and coping: An exploratory study.Family Process, 1976,4, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Geer, J.Multivariate analysis for the social sciences. San Francisco: Freeman, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., MacBride, A., & Vachon, M. Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement.Social Science and Medicine, 1977,11, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, M. Assessment of social adjustment.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1975,32, 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The authors, affiliated with the Oregon Mental Health Division, would like to acknowledge the help of the following people: Dr. Al Sheff, Clinical Director, Oregon State Hospital (OSH); Donna Clark, R. N., B. S. N., Nursing Day Supervisor, Oregon State Hospital; the ward staff at OSH: Ruth Shirley, Ph.D., R.N., Director of Marion County Community Mental Health Program; Luce LeFleur, M.P.S., Supervisor of Screening Crisis Marion County Community Mental Health Program; Dave Drummond, Ph.D., Clinical Supervisor Marion County Day Treatment Program; Corinne Nygaard, Program Secretary; Jess Armas, MSW, Director of the Community Counseling Center in Salem, Oregon, and his staff; and Barry Kast, MSW, Program Manager for Day Treatment, Benton County Mental Health, and his staff. Without their generous help, this study would not have been possible. Special thanks if given to Jeanne Robinson, our efficient and tireless interviewer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Froland, C., Brodsky, G., Olson, M. et al. Social support and social adjustment: Implications for mental health professionals. Community Ment Health J 15, 82–93 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757330

Keywords

Navigation