Skip to main content
Log in

The tension between research and practice: Assumptions of the experimental paradigm

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of an empirical (as opposed to a theoretical, clinical-intuitive) basis for practice using experimentally derived knowledge will produce a new model of practice based upon the same interactional paradigm that governs experimental research. Practice will become frankly manipulative and practitioners will employ all the devices that experimenters now use to assure the internal validity of experiments—deception, control of idiosyncratic behavior, stifling of dialogue, and the repression of two-way synergistic learning. While the new paradigm may accelerate the pace and intensify the degree of behavior change, it may, in the end, bring unwanted consequences for all participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. Dangers in applying results from experimental social psychology.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E.The social animal, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E., & Mills, J. The effect of severity of initiation or liking for a group.Journal of Behavioral and Social Psychology, 1959,59, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzun, J.Science: The glorious entertainment. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E.The structure of evil. New York: George Braziller, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E. The effect of dissonant persuasive communications upon changes in selfreferring attitudes.Journal of Personality, 1962,30, 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A. E., & Suinn, R. M. Individual psychotherapy and behavior therapy. In M. R. Rozenweig and L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual Review Psychology, 1975,26 509–555.

  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E.Interpersonal attraction. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, W. W.: Social work education: Issues and problems in the light of recent developments.Journal of Education for Social Work, 1976,12(1), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S.The application of social psychology to clinical practice. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briar, S. Social work's function.Social Work, 1976,21, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J. & Whitehead, A. N.The common sense of science. New York: Vintage Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryne, D.The attraction paradigm New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLoreto, A. O.Comparative, psychotherapy: An Experimental analysis. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. W. Whence and whither social work? A sociological analysis.Social Work, 1956,1, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. cognitive dissonance.Scientific American, 1962,207, 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. Is casework effective? A review.Social Work, 1973,18, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J., & Gochros, H.:Planned behavior change: Behavior modification in social work. New York: The Free Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. L., Carlsmith, J. M. & Sears, D. O.Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadlin, H., & Ingle, G. Through the one-way mirror: The limits of experimental selfreflection.American Psychologist, 1975,30, 1003–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, J.S. The therapist as manipulator.Psychology Today, December 1974, 90–95.

  • Grinnell, R. M., Jr., Hunter, M., & Kyte, N. S. The prestige and effectiveness of the social work methods.Journal of Social Welfare, Winter 1976, 5–15.

  • Hampden-Turner, C.Radical man. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenckman, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, A. H., Schneider, D. O., & Polefka, J.Person perception, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Goethals, G.: Order effects in impression formation: Attribution context, and the nature of the entity. In E. E. Jones, et al. (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbet, R.The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior New York: General Learning Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C.:A time to speak: On human values and social research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A., & Kiesler, S. B.Conformity. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. On the paradigmatic objectives to experimental psychology.American Psychologist, 1976,31, 655–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. Comparative studies studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that ‘everybody has won and all must have prizes’?” Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Denver, Colorado, 1974.

  • Macauley, J., & Berkowitz, L. (Eds.),Altruism and helping behavior: Social psychological studies of some antecedents and consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinert, R. What do social workers do? A study,Social Work 1976,21(2), 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: Behavioral study of obedience.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963,67, 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority.Human Relations, 1965,18, 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, J.Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, S., & Singer, J. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional statePsychological Review, 1962,69, 379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A., & Goldiamond, I.Social casework: A behavioral approach. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, R. B., Staples, F., Cristol, A., Yorkston, N., & Whipple, K.Psychotherapy vs. behavior therapy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P.The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E.: Helping a distressed person: Social, personality, and stimulus determinants. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. Studying the definition of the situation: Theory and field research strategies. In J. G. Mavis and B. N. Meltzer (Eds.),Symbolic interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, J.Psychological solutions to social problems. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. A. The development of interpersonal competence. In D. Goslin (Ed.),Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N.Science and the modern world. New York: Mentor Books, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P.: The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. J. Arnold and D. Levine (Eds.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saleebey, D. The tension between research and practice: Assumptions of the experimental paradigm. Clin Soc Work J 7, 267–284 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761887

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00761887

Keywords

Navigation