Skip to main content
Log in

Anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) in magnetite grains

  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

ARM has been measured in a range of inducing, steady fields up to 50 oersteds and for 6 sizes of magnetite grains with average diameters 5 μm to 174 μm. For all sizes a slight non-linearity of ARM with inducing field was found, apparently comprising a non-linear contribution independent of grain size plus a linear contribution which increased with decreasing grain size. In the largest grains induced ARM agreed well with multidomain grain theory. Relative enhancement of ARM in smaller grains is comparable to the enhancement of thermoremanence and therefore appears to indicate a pseudosingle domain contribution to ARM in small grains. However the observations allow an alternative explanation in terms of more extreme dimension ratios in the smaller grains. Presentation of the equations for multidomain ARM and TRM using observed instead of intrinsic susceptibilities makes it appear that the inadequacy of multidomain theory (and consequent necessity for pseudo-single domain theory) are less serious than has been supposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Rimbert,Contribution à l'étude de l'action de champs alternatifs sur les aimantations rémanentes des roches — Applications géophysiques, Revue de l'Institut Francais du Pétrole14 (1959), 17 and 123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. J. Patton andJ. L. Fitch,Anhysteretic magnetization in small steady fields, J. Geophys. Res.67 (1962), 307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Néel,Some theoretical aspects of rock magnetism, Advances in Physics4 (1955) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. D. Stacey,Theory of the magnetic properties of igneous rocks in alternating fields, Phil. Mag.6 (1961), 1241.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. D. Stacey,The physical theory of rock magnetism, Advances in Physics12 (1963), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. S. Bhathal andF. D. Stacey,Field-induced anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in rocks, Pure and Appl. Geophys.76 (1969/V), 123.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. Bhathal, D. E. W. Gillingham andF. D. Stacey,Thermal relaxation of magnetic domain misalignment in rocks, Pure and Appl. Geophys.76 (1969/V), 130.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. G. Parry,Magnetic properties of dispersed magnetite powders, Phil. Mag.11 (1965), 303.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. O. Dickson, C. W. F. Everitt, L. G. Parry andF. D. Stacey,Origin of thermoremanent magnetization, Earth and Plan. Sci. Letters1 (1966), 222.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. D. Stacey,The Koenigsberger ratio and the nature of thermoremanence in igneous rocks, Earth and Plan. Sci. Letters2 (1967), 67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillingham, D.E.W., Stacey, F.D. Anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) in magnetite grains. PAGEOPH 91, 160–165 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879565

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879565

Keywords

Navigation