Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence rate of a penalty-function scheme

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The penalty-function approach is an attractive method for solving constrained nonlinear programming problems, since it brings into play all of the well-developed unconstrained optimization techniques, If, however, the classical steepest-descent method is applied to the standard penalty-function objective, the rate of convergence approaches zero as the penalty coefficient is increased to yield a close approximation to the true solution.

In this paper, it is shown that, ifm+1 steps of the conjugate-gradient method are successively repeated (wherem is the number of constraints), the convergence rate when applied to the penalty-function objective conveges at a rate predicted by the second derivative of the Lagrangian. This rate is independent of the penalty coefficient and, hence, the scheme yields reasonable convergence for a first-order method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Courant, T.,Calculus of Variations and Supplementary Notes and Exercises, Supplementary Notes by M. Kruskal and H. Rubin, Revised and Amended by J. Moser, New York University, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Butler, T., andMartin, A. V.,On a Method of Courant for Minimizing Functionals, Journal of Mathematics and Physics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1962.

  3. Luenberger, D. G.,Optimization by Vector Space Methods, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fiacco, A. V., andMcCormick, G. P.,Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zangwill, W. I.,Nonlinear Programming Via Penalty Functions, Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1967.

  6. Bryson, A. E., andHo, Y. C.,Applied Optimal Control, Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstine, H. H.,Minimum Problems in the Functional Calculus, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Series 2, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1940.

  8. Antosiewicz, H. A., andRheinboldt, W. C.,Numerical Analysis and Functional Analysis, Survey of Numerical Analysis, Edited by J. Todd, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akaike, H.,On a Successive Transformation of Probability Distributions and its Application to the Analysis of the Optimum Gradient Method, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1959–1960.

  10. Fletcher, R., andReeves, C. M.,Functional Minimization by Conjugate Gradients, Computer Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1964.

  11. Shah, B. V., Buehler, R. J., andKempthorne, O.,Some Algorithms for Minimizing a Function of Several Variables, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1964.

  12. Daniel, J. W.,The Conjugate Gradient Method for Linear and Nonlinear Operator Equations, Stanford University, Department of Mathematics, Ph.D. Thesis, 1965.

  13. Hestenes, M. R., andStiefel, E.,Method of Conjugate Gradients for Solving Linear Systems, Journal of Research for the National Bureau of Standards, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1952.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. R. Hestenes

This research was supported by National Science Foundation, Grant No. NSF-GK-1683.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luenberger, D.G. Convergence rate of a penalty-function scheme. J Optim Theory Appl 7, 39–51 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933591

Keywords

Navigation